Quality Control Scheme Selection with a Case of Aviation Equipment Development

References

• Ahire, S. L. (1997). Management science-total quality management interfaces: an integrative framework. Interfaces, 27(6), 91–105. doi:10.1287/inte.27.6.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, D. (2018). Organizational module design and architectural inertia: Evidence from structural recombination of business divisions. Organization Science, 29(5), 1–23. doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Harbi, K. M. A. S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 19–27. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
   Google Scholar
• Altfeld, H. H. (2016). Commercial aircraft projects: Managing the development of highly complex products. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2003). Managing in an age of modularity. Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations, 149, 84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, F., & DeCroix, G. A. (2004). Decentralized pricing and capacity decisions in a multicontractor system with modular assembly. Management Science, 50(9), 1293–1308. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buell, R. W., Kim, T., & Tsay, C. J. (2016). Creating reciprocal value through operational transparency. Management Science, 63(6), 1673–1695. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buenstorf, G. (2005). Sequential production, modularity and technological change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16(2), 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Buergin, J., Belkadi, F., Hupays, C., Gupta, R. K., Bitte, F., Lanza, G., & Bernard, A. (2018). A modular-based approach for just-in-time specification of customer orders in the aircraft manufacturing industry. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 21, 61–74. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabigiosu, A., & Camuffo, A. (2012). Beyond the “mirroring” hypothesis: Product modularity and interorganizational relations in the air conditioning industry. Organization Science, 23(3), 686–703. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, M., & Pinedo, M. (2008). Total quality management and operational risk in the service industries. In Z.-L. Chen & S. Raghavan (Eds.), State-of-the-art decision-making tools in the information-intensive age, Informs annual meeting, October 12–15, 2018, Chicago (pp. 154–169). Maryland, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Demirkesen, S., & Ozorhon, B. (2017). Measuring project management performance: Case of construction industry. Engineering Management Journal, 29(4), 258–277. doi:10.1080/10429247.2017.1380579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirtas, O. (2013). Evaluating the core capabilities for strategic outsourcing decisions at aviation maintenance industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 1134–1143. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.587
   Google Scholar
• Dörenberg, F. M., & Redmond, W. A. (1997). Integrated and modular systems for commercial aviation. Presented at UCLA “Modular Avionics” short course, Los Angeles, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Eastham, J., Tucker, D. J., Varma, S., & Sutton, S. M. (2014). PLM software selection model for project management using hierarchical decision modeling with criteria from PMBOK EQ \o\ac(○,R) knowledge areas. Engineering Management Journal, 26(3), 13–24. doi:10.1080/10429247.2014.11432016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, D., & Kim, L. (2002). Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1417–1429. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00072-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, L. Q. (2012). Study on quality behavior of the service-oriented manufacturing network node. Beijing, China: Economic Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G., & Sakakibara, S. (1994). A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. Journal of Operations Management, 11(4), 339–366. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(97)90004-8
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., & Mendrizki, S. (2012). Optimal modularity: a demonstration of the evolutionary advantage of modular architectures. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22(5), 935–956. doi:10.1007/s00191-011-0240-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galunic, D. C., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2001). Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1229–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaska, T., Watkin, C., & Chen, Y. (2015). Integrated modular avionics-past, present, and future. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 30(9), 12–23. doi:10.1109/MAES.2015.150014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, J., & Hall, N. G. (2013). Total cost control in project management via satisficing. Management Science, 59(6), 1354–1372. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. V., Siemsen, E., & Vasudeva, G. (2015). Colocation still matters: Conformance quality and the interdependence of R&D and manufacturing in the pharmaceutical industry. Management Science, 61(11), 2760–2781. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne, Y., & De Reyck, B. (2009). Towards a single European sky. Interfaces, 9(5), 400–414. doi:10.1287/inte.1090.0436
   Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15(1), 38–55. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illés, B., Tamás, P., Dobos, P., & Skapinyecz, R. (2017). New challenges for quality assurance of manufacturing processes in industry 4.0. In Solid State Phenomena (Vol. 261, pp. 481–486). Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jean, B. I. (2007). A380 integrated modular avionics. Proceedings of the ARTIST2 Meeting on Integrated Modular Avionics, 1(2), 72–75.
   Google Scholar
• Jeang, A. (2015). Project management for uncertainty with multiple objectives optimization of time, cost and reliability. International Journal of Production Research, 53(5), 1503–1526. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.952792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey Thieme, R., Michael Song, X., & Shin, G. C. (2003). Project management characteristics and new product survival. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 104–119. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.2002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, T. G. (1999). On creating organizational support for the project management method. International Journal of Project Management, 17(1), 47–53. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00062-8
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y., & Wang, Y. J. (2006). Relationship between total quality management (TQM) and continuous improvement of international project management (CIIPM). Technovation, 26(5–6), 716–722. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuei, C. H., Madu, C. N., & Lin, C. (2001). The relationship between supply chain quality management practices and organizational performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(8), 864–872. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006031
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Kao, H. A., & Yang, S. (2014). Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia Cirp, 16, 3–8. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information & Management, 38(5), 323–335. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00074-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. P., Liu, S. F., Fang, Z. G., & Xu., L. (2014). Hierarchical planning—based on quality coordination model for complex equipment development. Journal of Systems & Management, 23(1), 36–40. ID: 1005-2542 (2014)01-0036-06.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Hipel Keith, W., Fang, Z. G., & Yuan, W. F. (2012). Networked decision model for managing quality in supply chain of complex product. Control and Decision, 27(11), 1685–1693.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, S. M., Shen, H. P., & Chen, J. C. (2017). An integrated approach to project management using the Kano model and QFD: an empirical case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(13–14), 1584–1608. doi:10.1080/14783363.2016.1151780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyneis, J. M., & Ford, D. N. (2007). System dynamics applied to project management: a survey, assessment, and directions for future research. System Dynamics Review, 23(2‐3), 157–189. doi:10.1002/sdr.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masahiko, A. (2003). Module time: The essence of new industrial structure. Shanghai, China: Far East press.
   Google Scholar
• Might, R. J., & Fischer, W. A. (1985). The role of structural factors in determining project management success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 32(2), 71–77. doi:10.1109/TEM.1985.6447584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkola, J. H. (2006). Capturing the degree of modularity embedded in product architectures. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(2), 128–146. doi:10.1111/jpim.2006.23.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkola, J. H., & Gassmann, O. (2003). Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(2), 204–218. doi:10.1109/TEM.2003.810826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikoofal, M. E., & Gümüş, M. (2018). Quality at the source or at the end? Managing supplier quality under information asymmetry. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 20(3), 498–516. doi:10.1287/msom.2017.0652
   Google Scholar
• Olmos-Sanchez, D. A., & Bocquet, J. C. (2016, September). Towards a methodology to improve supply chain performance through the analysis of outsourcing production processes: Application to aeronautics sector. Operational Research OR58 Annual Conference, Portsmouth, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ou, C. S., Liu, F. C., Hung, Y. C., & Yen, D. C. (2010). A structural model of supply chain management on firm performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(5), 526–545. doi:10.1108/01443571011039614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrisor, I., & Cozmiuc, D. (2017). Global supply chain management organization at siemens in the advent of industry 4.0. In L. Saglietto & C. Cezanne (Eds.), Global intermediation and logistics service providers (pp. 123–142). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2133-4
   Google Scholar
• Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H., & Meyer, A. D. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48(8), 1008–1023. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psomas, E., Vouzas, F., & Kafetzopoulos, D. (2014). Quality management benefits through the “soft” and “hard” aspect of TQM in food companies. The TQM Journal, 26(5), 431–444. doi:10.1108/TQM-02-2013-0017
   Google Scholar
• Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. (2013). The handbook for quality management: A complete guide to operational excellence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, S. U. (2006). Quality management in logistics: an examination of industry practices. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(3), 233–240. doi:10.1108/13598540610662130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54–89.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R. (2000). Modular architectures, knowledge assets and organizational learning: new management processes for product creation. International Journal of Technology Management, 19(6), 610–629. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2000.002839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 63–76. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucedo-Martínez, J. A., Pérez-Lara, M., Marmolejo-Saucedo, J. A., Salais-Fierro, T. E., & Vasant, P. (2018). Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations: A review. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 9(3), 789–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serban, A. I. (2015). Managing transformation: Business process reengineering or total quality management. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(5), 81–86. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i5/1594
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The architecture of complexity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Su, Q. (2015). The relationship between quality management and new product development: evidence from China. Operations Management Research, 8(1), 1–14. doi:10.1007/s12063-014-0096-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J., & Yao, W. X. (2009). Aircraft structure design. Beijing, China: National Defense Industry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. B., & Walter, R. (2007, October). Transitioning from federated avionics architectures to integrated modular avionics. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, DASC’07, Dallas, TX. IEEE/AIAA 26th, 2-A. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M., & Gorecky, D. (2015). Towards industry 4.0-standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems. Ifac-Papersonline, 48(3), 579–584. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.143
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Yin, Y., Li, D., & Browne, G. J. (2018). Owner’s risk allocation and contractor’s role behavior in a project: A parallel-mediation model. Engineering Management Journal, 30(1), 14–23. doi:10.1080/10429247.2017.1408388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. M. (2013). Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organization Science, 24(2), 339–355. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar