Understanding the Interrelationships Between Organizational Performance Measurement System Implementation Variables

References

• Abdel-Halim, A. M. S., & Ahmed, M. N. (2022). Evaluating the usefulness of two proposed performance management frameworks: Evidence from business practice. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-01-2018-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, A., Kumar, M., & Walker, H. (2018). A decision theory perspective on complexity in performance measurement and management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(11), 2214–2244. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2016-0632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alias, Z., Zawawi, E. M. A., Yusof, K., & Aris, N. M. (2014). Determining critical success factors of project management practice: A conceptual framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.041
   Google Scholar
• Anjomshoae, A., Hassan, A., & Wong, K. Y. (2019). An integrated AHP-based scheme for performance measurement in humanitarian supply chains. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(5), 938–957. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2018-0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, R. S., & Ferreira, A. M. D. S. D. C. (2022). Management control systems and innovation: A levers of control analysis in an innovative company. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(4), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-09-2020-0137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance measurement: Challenges for tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M. (2005). Researching performance measurement system implementation: The dynamics of success and failure. Production Planning & Control, 16(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280512331333011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M. (2021). Performance measurement and management in a VUCA world. International Journal of Production Research, 59(24), 7311–7316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.2004042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., Franco-Santos, M., Micheli, P., & Pavlov, A. (2018). Performance measurement and management: A system of systems perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2788–2799. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1404159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., Melnyk, S., & Bititci, U. S. (2018). Performance measurement and management: Theory and practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(11), 2010–2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2018-784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., & Mills, J. (2002). The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(11), 1288–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210450329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, P. F., & McEvoy, G. M. (1989). Determinants of the institutionalization of planned organizational change. Group & Organization Studies, 14(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118901400105
   Google Scholar
• Burnes, B. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2004). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models. Tools and Techniques of Organizational Change, Kogan Page Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• de Almeida, A. T., Frej, E. A., Morais, D. C., & Costa, A. P. C. S. (2021). Multiple criteria group decisions with partial information about preference. In D. M. Kilgour & C. Eden (Eds.), Handbook of group decision and negotiation (pp. 921–945).
   Google Scholar
• de Almeida, A. T., & Roselli, L. R. P. (2022). A framework for building multicriteria decision models with regard to reliability, risk, and maintenance. In A. T. de Almeida, L. Ekenberg, P. Scarf, E. Zio, & M. J. Zuo (Eds.), Multicriteria and optimization models for risk, reliability, and maintenance decision analysis: recent advances (pp. 57–75). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P. W. (2014). Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, V. (2008). Application of the Analytic Network Process (ANP) in a framework of ERP systems implementation success. In 4th International IEEE Conference Intelligent Systems, 2008 Proceedings of the International IEEE Conference Intelligent Systems in Varna, Bulgaria (pp. 2019–2024). IEEE Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Errida, A., & Lotfi, B. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, 184797902110162. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211016273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghalayini, A. M., Noble, J. S., & Crowe, T. J. (1997). An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 48(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(96)00093-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goepel, K. D. (2013). Implementing the analytic hierarchy process as a standard method for multi-criteria decision making in corporate enterprises–A new AHP excel template with multiple inputs. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (pp. 1–10). Creative Decisions Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, W., Saaty, T. L., & Wei, L. (2018). Evaluating and optimizing technological innovation efficiency of industrial enterprises based on both data and judgments. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 17(1), 9–43. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622017500390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelínková, L. (2017). Factors influencing the implementation and continuous improvement of the performance management system. KNE Social Sciences, 1(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v1i2.660
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpak, B., & Topcu, I. (2010). Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: An analytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keathley-Herring, H. (2017). An approach to quantify the factors that affect performance measurement system implementation. Engineering Management Journal, 29(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2017.1298181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keathley-Herring, H. R. (2016). Empirical investigation of factors that affect the successful implementation of performance measurement systems [ Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech].
   Google Scholar
• Kennerley, M., & Neely, A. (2002). A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(11), 1222–1245. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210450293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennerley, M., & Neely, A. (2003). Measuring performance in a changing business environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310458465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurshid Khan, M., & Wibisono, D. (2008). A hybrid knowledge‐based performance measurement system. Business Process Management Journal, 14(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810864899
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. (2012). Accelerate! Harvard Business Review, 90(11), 44–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, L. C., Lam, K. C., & Cao, D. (2006). Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(6), 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, R. (2002). The Delphi method: A powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(4), 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510210450677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucianetti, L., Battista, V., & Koufteros, X. (2019). Comprehensive performance measurement systems design and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(2), 326–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2017-0412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., Favero, N., & Zhu, L. (2015). Performance gaps and managerial decisions: A Bayesian decision theory of managerial action. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1221–1246. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, J. W., & Brightman, B. K. (2000). Leading organizational change. Journal of Workplace Learning, 12(2), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620010316226
   Google Scholar
• Naro, G., Travaillé, D., & Mundy, J. (2011). The role of the balanced scorecard in the formulation and control of strategic processes. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 12(3), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/09675421111187674
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A., Adams, C., & Crowe, P. (2001). The performance prism in practice. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040110385142
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A., & Bourne, M. (2000). Why measurement initiatives fail. Measuring Business Excellence, 4(4), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040010362283
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudurupati, S. S., & Bititci, U. S. (2005). Implementation and impact of IT-supported performance measurement systems. Production Planning & Control, 16(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280512331333057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudurupati, S. S., Bititci, U. S., Kumar, V., & Chan, F. T. (2011). State of the art literature review on performance measurement. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(2), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, I., & Hassan, D. (2013). Organizational performance management: Examining the practical utility of the performance prism. Organization Development Journal, 31(3), 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Oladimeji, O., Keathley-Herring, H., & Cross, J. A. (2019). Factors affecting performance measurement implementation: A SEM analysis. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (pp. 230–235). Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).
   Google Scholar
• Oladimeji, O. O., Keathley-Herring, H., & Cross, J. A. (2020). System dynamics applications in performance measurement research: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(7), 1541–1578. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2018-0453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. M., & Melão, N. F. (2012). The implementation of the balanced scorecard in a school district: Lessons learned from an action research study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(8), 919–939. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211277156
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (pmbok guide).
   Google Scholar
• Quezada, L. E., Aguilera, D. E., Palominos, P. I., & Oddershede, A. M. (2021). An ANP model to generate performance indicators for manufacturing firms under a balanced scorecard approach. Engineering Management Journal, 34(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1840877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbani, F., Lalji, S. N., Abbas, F., Jafri, S. W., Razzak, J. A., Nabi, N., Jahan, F., Ajmal, A., Petzold, M., Brommels, M., & Tomson, G. (2011). Understanding the context of balanced scorecard implementation: A hospital–based case study in Pakistan. Implementation Science, 6(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Redden, G. (2019). Questioning performance measurement: Metrics, organizations and power. SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, R. A., Moreira, A. M., Van den Broek, P., & Pimentel, A. (2011). Hybrid assessment method for software engineering decisions. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and applications of the analytic network process: Decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2016). The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making. In S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, & J. Figueira (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (pp. 363–419). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., & Özdemir, M. S. (2014). How many judges should there be in a group? Annals of Data Science, 1(3–4), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-014-0026-4
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, O. P., Terlizzi, M. A., & de Moraes, H. R. D. O. C. (2017). Cost and time project management success factors for information systems development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1608–1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secundo, G., Magarielli, D., Esposito, E., & Passiante, G. (2017). Supporting decision-making in service supplier selection using a hybrid fuzzy extended AHP approach: A case study. Business Process Management Journal, 23(1), 196–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2016-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, A. (1980). Organizational paradigms: A theory of organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 8(3), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90045-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (1994). How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 169–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. L. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control system to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. H., & Smith, D. (2007). Implementing strategically aligned performance measurement in small firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stormi, K. T., Laine, T., & Korhonen, T. (2019). Agile performance measurement system development: An answer to the need for adaptability? Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 15(2), 231–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Analytic Network Process (ANP) method: A comprehensive review of applications, advantages, and limitations. Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems, 1(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJDSIS3202885
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Taylor, M. (2013). Antecedents of effective performance measurement system implementation: An empirical study of UK manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18), 5485–5498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.784412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. & Taylor, M. (2014). Factors influencing effective implementation of performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and large firms: a perspective from Contingency Theory, International Journal of Production Research, 52,(3), 847–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toepoel, V., & Emerson, H. (2017). Using experts’ consensus (the delphi method) to evaluate weighting techniques in web surveys not based on probability schemes. Mathematical Population Studies, 24(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2017.1330012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung, A., Baird, K., & Schoch, H. P. (2011). Factors influencing the effectiveness of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(12), 1287–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111187457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valmohammadi, C. (2010). Using the analytic network process in business strategy selection: A case study. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(10), 5205–5213.
   Google Scholar
• Van Camp, J., & Braet, J. (2016). Taxonomizing performance measurement systems’ failures. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(5), 672–693. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2015-0054
   Google Scholar
• Whelan-Berry, K. S., & Somerville, K. A. (2010). Linking change drivers and the organizational change process: A review and synthesis. Journal of Change Management, 10(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697011003795651
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, J. L., & Galpin, T. J. (2010). The engagement factor: Building a high‐commitment organization in a low‐commitment world. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(5), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756661011076282
   Google Scholar
• Wijnmalen, D. J. (2007). On getting meaningful “BOCR” results with ANP’s Super Decisions software. In C. Garuti (Ed.), International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP) 2007. Creative Decisions Foundation. https://www.isahp.org/uploads/meaningful-bocr-result-with-anp.pdf
   Google Scholar