The Field Instructor as Group Worker: Managing Trust and Competition in Group Supervision

References

• Arkin, N., Freund, A., & Saltman, I. (1999). A group supervision model for broadening multiple-method skills of social work students. Social Work Education, 18(1), 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B.L. (1998). Focus group interviewing. In B. L. Berg, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (pp. 100–117). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, J., & Goodyear, R. (1992). Fundamentals of clinical supervision.. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, J. (1995). Problembased, small group learning. British Medical Journal, 311, 342–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Globerman, J., & Sussman, T. (in press). Field instructor competence in group supervision: Students views. Journal of Teaching in Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Kline, W. (2000). A qualitative investigation of the process of group supervision with group counselors. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25, 376–393.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, B., Dastyk, R., & Wickham, E. R. (1972). Group supervision as a teaching/learning modality in social work. The Social Worker/Le Travailleur Social, 40, 256–261.
   Google Scholar
• Corey, G. (1990). Theory and practice of group counseling (3rd ed.). Monterey, CA, Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. (2002). Group supervision as a learning laboratory for the purposeful use of self in child protection work. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22(1/2), 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2001). Relationship of tutors' group dynamics skills to their performance ratings in problem based learning. Academic Medicine, 76, 473–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson, S. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, J., Jones, H., & Kolodny, R. (1965). Amodel for stages of developmental social workgroups. In S. Bernstein (Ed.), Explorations in group work (pp. 17–71). Boston: Milford House.
   Google Scholar
• Gazda, G. (1989). Group counseling. A developmental approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Geller, C. (1994). Group supervision as a vehicle for teaching group work to students: Field instruction in a senior center. The Clinical Supervisor, 12(1), 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, S. L., Hayes, R. L., & Paisley, P. O. (1997). Group work as a method of supervision. In S. Gladding (Ed.), New developments in group counseling (pp. 78–82). Greensboro, NC, ERIC/CASS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Globerman, J. & Bogo, M. (2002). The impact of hospital restructuring on social work field education. Health and Social Work, 27(1), 7–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. L., Blackman, L. S., & Brennan, C. (2000). Group supervision. In L. J. Bradley & N. Ladany (Eds.), Counselor supervision (pp. 183–206). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, E., & Johnston, R. (1985). Group supervision: Widely practiced but poorly understood. Counselor Education and Supervision, 24, 332–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarman-Rohde, L., McFall, J., Kolar, P., & Strom, G. (1997). The changing context of social work practice: Implications and recommendations for social work educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A. (1985). Supervision in social work (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, T. (1991). Reducing student anxiety in field work: Exploratory research and implications. The Clinical Supervisor, 9(2), 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, T., & Berman-Rossi, T. (1999). Advancing stages of group development theory: The case of institutionalized older persons. Social Work With Groups 22(2/3), 119–138.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, S. (2000). Make, make make, some music: Social group work with mothers and babies together. Social Work With Groups 22(3), 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• MacPherson, R., Jones, A., Whitehouse, C.R., & O'Neill, P.A. (2001). Small group learning in the final year of a medical degree: A quantitative and qualitative evaluation. Medical Teacher, 23, 494–502.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mpofu, D. J. S., Das, M., Stewart, T., Dunn, E., & Schmidt, H. (1998). Perceptions of group dynamics in problem-based learning sessions: A time to reflect on group issues. Medical Teacher, 20, 421–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. A., & Lovell, M. (1993). Supervision: A description of a supervisory group for group counselors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 33, 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, L. R. (1996). Group supervision: Still widely practiced but poorly understood. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35, 295–307.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, B. (2000). Group supervision: A guide to creative practice.. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• QSRNUD ISTVivo. (1999). Australia: Qualitative Solutions and Research Scolari Sage Publications Software.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, L. Y. (1995). Stages of development in women's groups: A relational model. In R. Kurland & R. Salmon (Eds.), Group work practice in a troubled society: Problems and opportunities (pp. 117–138). New York: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, L. Y. (1997). Rethinking stages of development in women's groups: Implications for practice. Social Work With Groups, 20(3), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1993). Interactional supervision.. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park CA, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. & Corbin, J., (Eds.) (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sternbach, J. (2001). Men connecting and changing: Stages of relational growth in men's groups. Social Work With Groups, 23(4), 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Tebb, S., Manning, D. W., & Klaumann, T. K. (1996). A renaissance of group supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 14(2), 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Tipping, J., Freeman, R. S., & Rachlis, A.R. (1995). Using faculty and student perceptions of group dynamics to develop recommendations for PBL training. Academic Medicine, 70, 1050–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B., & Jensen, M. (1977). Stages in small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, C. A., & Young, T. M. (1999). Combining individual and group supervision in educating for the social work profession. The Clinical Supervisor, 18(2), 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J., & Cohen, C. (2001). Group work education in the field.. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Werk, A, & Caplan, T. (1998). Non-violent group supervision within a violence clinic context. The clinical supervisor, 17(2), 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Werstlein, P., & Borders, L. (1997). Group process variables in group supervision. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 22(2), 120–136.
   Google Scholar
• Yalom, I. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar