259
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Section: Field Education in Social Work Out in the Field

Field Notes

Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Field Education Supervision

Pages 337-349 | Accepted 01 Jan 2003, Published online: 10 Jan 2014

References

  • Behling, J. C., Curtis, C., & Foster, S. A. (1982). Impact of sex-role combinations on student performance in field instruction. Journal of Education for Social Work, 18, 93–97.
  • Bogo, M., & Vayda, E. (1998). The practice of field instruction in social work: theory and process (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Carlson, J. G. (1985). Recent assessments of the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 356–365.
  • Carlson, J. G. (1989). Testing the test. Affirmative: In support of researching the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 484–486.
  • Carskadon, T. (1979). Clinical and counseling aspects of the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator: A research review. Research in Psychological Type, 2, 83–84.
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2001). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
  • Dilley, J. (1987). Applications of Jungian type theory to counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision, 27(1), 44–52.
  • Ditiberio, J. K., & Hammer, A. L. (1993). Introduction to type in college. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
  • Ellison, M. L. (1994). Critical field instructor behaviors: Student and field instructor views. Arete, 18(2), 12–20.
  • Fortune, A. E., & Abramson, J. S. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 95–110.
  • Fortune, A. E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37 111–119.
  • Giddings, M. M., Thompson, K. H., & Holland, T. P. (1996). The relationship between student assessments of agency work climate and satisfaction with practicum. Arete, 21(2), 25–35.
  • Gitterman, A. (1989). Field instruction in social work: Issues, tasks, and skills. The Clinical Supervisor, 7, 77–91.
  • Handley, P. (1982). Relationship between supervisors' and trainees' cognitive styles and the supervision process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 508–515.
  • Harkness, O., & Poertoer, J. (1989). Research and social work supervision: A conceptual review. Social Work, 34, 115–119.
  • Harvey, R. J. (1996). Reliability and validity. In A. L. Hammer (Ed.), MBTI applications: A decade of research on the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator (pp. 5–29). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Hirsch, S. K., & Kise, J. A. G. (2000). Introduction to type and coaching. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
  • Holtzman, R., & Raskin, M. S. (1988). Why field placements fail: Study results. In M. S. Raskin (Ed.), Empirical studies infield instruction (pp. 123–136). New York: Haworth.
  • Itzhaky, H., & Eliahou, A. (2001). The effect of learning styles and empathy on perceived effectiveness of social work student supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 20(2), 19–29.
  • Jones, J., & Sherman, R. (1979). Clinical uses of the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator. Research in Psychological Type, 2, 32–45.
  • Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types. New York: HarcourtBrace.
  • Kadushin, A. E. (1991). Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 11–12). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
  • Kissman, K., & Van Tran, T. (1990). Perceived quality of field placement education among graduate social work students. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 5, 27–30.
  • Knight, C. (1996). A study of MSW and BSW students' perceptions of their field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 32, 399–414.
  • Knight, C. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students' views of effective field supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 357–380.
  • Kroeger, O., & Thuesen, J. (1988). Type talk: The 16 personality types that determine how we live, love, and work. New York: Dell.
  • Lawrence, G. (1993). People types & tiger stripes (3rd ed.). Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
  • Lawrence, G. (1997). Looking at type and learning styles. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Lazar, A., & Eisikovitz, Z. (1997). Social work students' preferences regarding supervisory styles and supervisor's behavior. The Clinical Supervisor, 16(1), 25–38.
  • Lazar, A., & Mosek, A. (1993). The influence of the field instructor—student relationship on evaluations of students' practice. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 111–120.
  • Majors, M. S., & Chartrand, J. M. (1999). Reliability and validity of MBTI Form M: Measurement accuracy and the use of type. Proceedings of APT-XIII, the Thirteenth Biennial International Conference of the Association for Psychological Type (pp. 289–290). Scottsdale, AZ: Association for Psychological Type.
  • McCaulley, M. (1990). The Myers—Briggs Type Indicator: A measure for individuals and groups. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 220, 181–195.
  • McRae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  • Middleman, R. R., & Rhody, G. B. (1985). Competent supervision. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Moore, L. S., Dettlaff, A. J., & Dietz, T. J. (2003, March). Comparing patterns of personality type preferences: Implications for social work education and practice. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Atlanta, GA.
  • Moore, L. S., Jenkins, D., & Dietz, T. (1998). Adapting social work education to student diversity: The use of the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator in curriculum development. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 16(1/2), 179–201.
  • Murray, J. B. (1990). Review of research on the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 1187–1202.
  • Myers, I., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Myers, K. (1993). Isabel Briggs Myers and type development. Bulletin of Psychological Type, 16(4), 6–8.
  • Myers, K. D., & Kirby, L. K. (1993). Type development: The Jungian model for lifelong growth. Bulletin of Psychological Type, 16(4), 4–5.
  • Pearman, R. R., & Albritton, S. C. (1997). I'm not crazy. I'm just not you. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.
  • Raskin, M. S. (1982). Factors associated with student satisfaction in undergraduate social work field placements. Arete, 7, 44–54.
  • Rogers, G., & McDonald, P. L. (1995). Expedience over education: Teaching methods used by field instructors. The Clinical Supervisor, 13(2), 41–65.
  • Rosenblatt, A., & Mayer, F. (1975). Objectionable supervisory styles: Students' view. Social Work, 20, 184–189.
  • Shulman, L. (1993). Teaching the helping skills (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
  • Shulman, L. (1999). The skills of helping individuals and groups (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
  • Steen, A. L. (1998). The effects of matched personality types on the outcome measure of perceived supervisory satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 2855A.
  • Swanson, J. L., & O'Saben, C. L. (1993). Differences in supervisory needs and expectations by trainee experience, cognitive style, and program membership. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 457–464.
  • Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. M. (1986). Construct validity of the Myers—Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 745–752.
  • Williams, S. B., Staley, D., & Rudyk, B. (2000). The Exam Preparation Inventory: A reliability and validity study. Proceedings of the fourth biennial international conference on education of the Center for Applications of Psychological Type (pp. 315–323). Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.