Digital Native Meet Friendly Visitor: A Flexner-Inspired Call to Digital Action

References

• Beaulaurier, R. L. (2005). Integrating computer content into social work curricula: A model for planning. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 25(1/2), 153–171. doi:10.1300/J067v25n01_10
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2004). Love online: Emotions on the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, L. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48, 297–306. doi:10.1093/sw/48.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerulo, K. A. (1997). Reframing sociological concepts for a brave new (virtual?) world. Sociological Inquiry, 67, 48–58. doi:10.1111/soin.1997.67.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinien, C., & Boutin, F. (2003, July). Bridging the cognitive divide in ICT-mediated learning. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2003. The 3rd IEEE International Conference Proceedings (pp. 422-423). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=41861
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (2010). 2010 Statistics on social work education in the United States: A summary. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=52269.
   Google Scholar
• Csiernik,R., Furze,P., Dromgole, L., GM Rishchynski, G.M. (2006). Information technology and social work—The dark side or light side? Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, (3-4), 9–25.
   Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C., & Smith, K. (2014). Big data for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/big_data_for_social_innovation
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, J., & Holosko, M. J. (Eds.). (2013). Information technology and evidence-based social work practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 47–61. doi:10.1007/BF02299597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flexner, A. (1915). Is social work a profession?—1915 Retrieved from http://www.socialwelfarehistory.com/programs/is-social-work-a-profession-1915/
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2014). Social work education and avoidable ignorance. Journal of Social Work Education., 50, 391–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henman, P., & Adler, M. (2003). Information technology and the governance of social security. Critical Social Policy, 23, 139–164. doi:10.1177/0261018303023002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, A., & Shaw, I. (2011). Social work and ICT. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kairala, M. (2014). Social work and technological challenges. In Kilpelainen, & Paykkonen (Eds.), E-competence for social work. Publications in the social sciences, research report 64, (pp. 63–72). Rovaniemi, Finland: University of Lapland.
   Google Scholar
• Kvasny, L. (2006). Let the sisters speak: Understanding information technology from the standpoint of the ‘other’. ACM SIGMIS Database, 37(4), 13–25. doi:10.1145/1185335
   Google Scholar
• Marson, S. M. (1998). A selective history of Internet technology and social work. Computers in Human Services, 14(2), 35–49. doi:10.1300/J407v14n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Matela, K., & Pohjola, A. (2014). Foreward. In Kilpelainen, & Paykkonen (Eds.), E-competence for social work. Publications in the social sciences, research report 64. Rovaniemi, Finland: University of Lapland. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283643260_eCompetence_for_Social_Work.
   Google Scholar
• Mishna, F., Bogo, M., Root, J., & Fantus, S. (2014). Here to stay: Cyber communication as a complement in social work practice. Families in Society, 95, 179–186. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.2014.95.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishna, F., Bogo, M., Root, J., Sawyer, J.-L., & Khoury-Kassabri, M. (2012). “It just crept in”: The digital age and implications for social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40, 277–286. doi:10.1007/s10615-012-0383-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, P. M. (2008). Reinterpreting Abraham Flexner’s speech, “Is social work a profession?”: Its meaning and influence on the field’s early professional development. Social Service Review, 82, 29–60. doi:10.1086/529399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2005). A systems approach to investigating child abuse deaths. British Journal of Social Work, 35(4), 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers (NASW) & National Association of Social Work Boards (NSWB). (2005). Standards for technology and social work practice. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers.org/practice/standards/NASWTechnologyStandards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nonprofit Technology Network. (2012). The state of nonprofit data, a report prepared by Idealware. Retrieved from http://www.nten.org/article/the-2012-state-of-nonprofit-data-report/
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, L., & Madoc-Jones, I. (2008). Reclaiming information and communications technology for empowering social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 8, 181–197. doi:10.1177/1468017307084739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perron, B. E., Taylor, H. O., Glass, J. E., & Margerum-Leys, J. (2010). Information and communication technologies in social work. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 67–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2014). Mobile technology fact sheet. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/ fact-sheets/mobile-technology-fact-sheet/
   Google Scholar
• Popple, P. R. (1985). The social work profession: A reconceptualization. Social Service Review, 59, 560–577. doi:10.1086/644331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, W. (2001). The role of science in social work: The perennial debate. Journal of Social Work, 1, 273–293. doi:10.1177/146801730100100303
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, M. (1917). Social diagnosis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, C. (1992). The person-in-environment reconsidered: New theoretical bridges. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 9, 205–219. doi:10.1007/BF00755861
   Google Scholar
• Sapey, B. (1995). Social services and communication technology: A user perspective of the implementation of a care management system in a social services department. New Technology in the Human Services, 8(1), 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, P. (2007). Bridging borders: How social workers build ties and transform relationships. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 12(2), 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer‐mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348. doi:10.1111/hcre.2002.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregeagle, S., & Darcy, M. (2008). Child welfare and information and communication technology: Today’s challenge. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 1481–1498. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar, M. (2002). A deeper, more social ecological social work practice. Social Service Review, 76, 480–497. doi:10.1086/341185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westlake, W. (2012). The ubiquity of cloud technology. Retrieved from https://uk.linkedin.com/in/william-westlake-6855191
   Google Scholar
• Zickuhr, K. and Smith, A. (2012). Digital differences. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/04/13/digital-differences/
   Google Scholar