8,434
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pages 607-621 | Accepted 18 Mar 2016, Published online: 30 May 2017

References

  • Augustín, Ó. G. (2011). Enhancing solidarity: Discourses of voluntary organizations on immigration and integration in multicultural societies. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 7, 81–97. doi:10.1080/17447143.2011.570344
  • Bogardus, E. S. (1926). Social distance in the city. Proceedings and Publications of the American Sociological Society, 20, 40–46.
  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2009). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (4th ed.). London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Qualitative Research Guidelines Project. Retrieved from http://www.qualres.org/HomeMaxi-3803.html
  • Coplan, A., & Goldie, P. (2011). Empathy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Davidson, L. (1988). Husserl’s refutation of psychologism and the possibility of a phenomenological psychology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 19, 1–17. doi:10.1163/156916288X00103
  • Davidson, L. (2003). Living outside mental illness: Qualitative studies of recovery in schizophrenia. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Davidson, L., & Cosgrove, L. A. (1991). Psychologism and phenomenological psychology revisited Part 1: The liberation from naturalism. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 22, 87–108. doi:10.1163/156916291X00082
  • Davidson, L., & Cosgrove, L. A. (2002). Psychologism and phenomenological psychology revisited, Part II: The return to positivity. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 33, 141–177. doi:10.1163/15691620260622877
  • Decety, J., & Moriguchi, Y. (2007). The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: Implications for intervention across different clinical conditions. BioPyschoSocial Medicine, 22, 1–21. doi:10.1186/1751-0759-1-22
  • Englander, M. (2012). The interview: Data collection in descriptive phenomenological human scientific research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43, 13–35. doi:10.1163/156916212X632943
  • Englander, M. (2014). Empathy training from a phenomenological perspective. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 45, 5–26. doi:10.1163/15691624-12341266
  • Englander, M., & Folkesson, A. (2014). Evaluating the phenomenological approach to empathy training. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 54, 294–313. doi:10.1177/0022167813493351
  • Gair, S. (2009). More on empathy: Considering student responses and Edith Stein’s framework for a fuller, transformative empathy. Advances in Social Welfare Education, 11, 251–269.
  • Gair, S. (2013). Inducing empathy: Pondering students’ (in)ability to empathize with an aboriginal man’s lament and what might be done about it. Journal of Social Work Education, 49, 136–149.
  • Gallagher, S. (2008). Brainstorming: Views and interviews on the mind. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.
  • Gallagher, S. (2012). Phenomenology. London, UK: Palgrave McMillan.
  • Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2012). The phenomenological mind (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Gallese, V. (2003). The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36, 171–180. doi:10.1159/000072786
  • Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493–501. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01262-5
  • Gerdes, K. E. (2011). Empathy, sympathy, and pity: 21st-century definitions and implications for practice and research. Journal of Social Service Research, 37, 230–241. doi:10.1080/01488376.2011.564027
  • Gerdes, K. E., & Segal, E. (2011). Importance of empathy for social work practice: Integrating new science. Social Work, 56, 141–148. doi:10.1093/sw/56.2.141
  • Gerdes, K. E., Segal, E. A., Jackson, K. F., & Mullins, J. L. (2011). Teaching empathy: A framework rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 109–131. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900085
  • Gillath, O., Shaver, P. R., Mikulincer, M., Nitzberg, R. E., Erez, A., & Van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2005). Attachment, caregiving, and volunteering: Placing volunteerism in an attachment-theoretical framework. Personal Relationships, 12, 425–446. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00124.x
  • Giorgi, A. P. (2002). The question of validity in qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 33, 1–18. doi:10.1163/156916202320900392
  • Giorgi, A. P. (2006). Concerning variations in the application of the phenomenological method. Humanistic Psychologist, 34, 305–319. doi:10.1207/s15473333thp3404_2
  • Giorgi, A. P. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  • Giorgi, A. P., & Giorgi, B. (2008). Phenomenological psychology. In C. Willig, & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 165–178). London, England: Sage.
  • Håkansson, J. (2003). Exploring the phenomenon of empathy. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
  • Husserl, E. (1992). Cartesianska meditationer: En inledning till fenomenologi (D. Birnbaum & S-O. Wallenstein, Trans.). Gothenburg, Sweden: Bokförlaget Daidalos. (Original work published 1932).
  • Husserl, E. (2006). The basic problems of phenomenology: From the lectures, winter semester, 1910-1911 (trans. I. Farin & J.G. Hart). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PloS Biology, 3, 529–535. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079
  • Kaplan, J. T., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Getting a grip on other minds: Mirror neurons, intention understanding, and cognitive empathy. Social Neuroscience, 1, 175–183. doi:10.1080/17470910600985605
  • Kasmier, D. (2010). A defense of Husserl’s method of free variation. In P. Vandevelde, & S. Luft (Eds.), Epistemology, archaeology, ethics (pp. 21–40). London, UK: Continuum.
  • Kohut, H. (1982). Introspection, empathy, and the semi-circle of mental health. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 63, 395–408.
  • Levy, D., Ben Shlomo, S., & Itzhaky, H. (2014). The “building blocks” of professional identity among social work graduates. Social Work Education, 33, 744–759. doi:10.1080/02615479.2014.883600
  • Luft, S., & Schlimme, J. E. (2013). The phenomenology of intersubjectivity in Jaspers and Husserl: On the capacities and limits of empathy and communication in psychiatric praxis. Psychopathology, 46, 345–354. doi:10.1159/000353272
  • Newell, J. M., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (2014). A competency-based approach to teaching professional self-care: An ethical consideration for social work educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 50, 427–439. doi:10.1080/10437797.2014.917928
  • Richmond, M. R. (1917). Social diagnosis. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1989). The Carl Rogers reader. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Rosan, P. J. (2012). The poetics of intersubjective life: Empathy and the other. Humanistic Psychologist, 40, 115–135. doi:10.1080/08873267.2012.643685
  • Scheler, M. (1954). The nature of sympathy. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Segal, E. A. (2011). Social empathy: A model built on empathy, contextual understanding, and social responsibility that promotes social justice. Journal of Social Service Research, 37, 266–277. doi:10.1080/01488376.2011.564040
  • Segal, E. A., Cimino, A. N., Gerdes, K. E., & Wagaman, M. A. (2013). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Interpersonal and Social Empathy Index. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4, 131–153. doi:10.5243/jsswr.2013.9
  • Segal, E. A., Wagaman, M. A., & Gerdes, K. E. (2012). Developing the Social Empathy Index: An exploratory factor analysis. Advances in Social Work, 13, 541–560.
  • Sjögren, J. (2005). Invandrades levnadsvillkor i Sverige: En forskningsöversikt. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University.
  • Stein, E. (1989). On the problem of empathy (3rd ed. ; W. Stein, Trans,). Washington, DC: ICS Publication. (Original work published 1916).
  • Stueber, K. (2016). Empathy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), forthcoming. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/empathy/
  • Turnage, B. F., Hong, Y. J., Stevenson, A. P., & Edwards, B. (2012). Social work students’ perceptions of themselves and others: Self-esteem, empathy, and forgiveness. Journal of Social Service Research, 38, 89–99. doi:10.1080/01488376.2011.610201
  • Westwood, M. J., & Lawrence, S. (1990). Uprooted: Towards a counsellor understanding of the refugee experience. International Journal of the Advancement of Counselling, 13, 145–153. doi:10.1007/BF00115709
  • Ylvissaker, S. (2011). Tales from the sequestered room: Client experiences of social work in Norway and Sweden. Journal of Social Work, 13, 203–220. doi:10.1177/1468017311412035
  • Zahavi, D. (2001). Beyond empathy: Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 151–167. doi:10.3846/coactivity.2010.08
  • Zahavi, D. (2007). Self and other: The limits of narrative understanding. Royal Institute of Philosophy supplements, 60, 179–201. doi:10.1017/S1358246107000094
  • Zahavi, D. (2010). Empathy, embodiment and interpersonal understanding: From Lipps to Schutz. Inquiry, 53, 285–306. doi:10.1080/00201741003784663
  • Zahavi, D. (2011a). Empathy and mirroring: Husserl and Gallese. In R. Breeur, & U. Melle (Eds.), 2012. Life, subjectivity & art: Essays in honor of Rudolf Bernet (pp. 217–254). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2211-8_9
  • Zahavi, D. (2011b). Empathy and direct social perception: A phenomenological proposal. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 541–558. doi:10.1007/s13164-011-0070-3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.