Effects of an Integrative Field Seminar for MSW Students

References

• Abramson, J. S., & Fortune, A. E. (1990). Improving field instruction: An evaluation of a seminar for new field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 26, 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 137–154. doi:10.1023/B:IHIE.0000048795.84634.4a
   Google Scholar
• Birkenmaier, J., & Berg-Weger, M. (2011). The practicum companion for social work: Self-care as professional development. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Birkenmaier, J., Wilson, R. J., Berg-Weger, M., Banks, R., & Hartung, M. (2003). MSW integrative seminars. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(1/2), 167–182. doi:10.1300/J067v23n01_11
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., & Vayda, E. (1998). The practice of field instruction in social work: Theory and process. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boisen, L., & Syers, M. (2004). The integrative case analysis model for linking theory and practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, L., Bhat, M., Fortune, A. E., & Mertz, L. (2016, January). Field instructors: Doing more with less? Or less with less? Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Social Work and Research, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, P. W., Robb, L., Bradley, J., & Kirzner, R. S. (2012). Complex and competing demands in field education: A qualitative study of field directors’ experiences. Field Educator, 2(2), 1–17. Retrieved from http://www2.simmons.edu/ssw/fe/i/Buck.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chow, A. Y. M., Lam, D. O. B., Leung, G. S. M., Wong, D. F. K., & Chan, B. F. P. (2011). Promoting reflexivity among social work students: The development and evaluation of a programme. Social Work Education, 30, 141–156. doi:10.1080/02615479.2011.540377
   Google Scholar
• Colby, I. (2014). Challenging social work education’s urban legends. Journal of Social Work Education, 50, 206–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards. Retrieved from https://cswe.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2008-EPAS/2008EDUCATIONALPOLICYANDACCREDITATIONSTANDARDS(EPAS)-08-24-2012.pdf.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2015a). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from https://cswe.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Accreditation-Process/2015-EPAS/2015EPAS_Web_FINAL.pdf.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2015b). 2014 statistics on social work education in the United States. Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B. (2012). “You make them do what?” A national survey on field seminar assignments. Advances in Social Work, 13, 618–632.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettlaff, A. J., & Wallace, G. (2003). Promoting integration of theory and practice in field education: An instructional tool for field instructors and field educators. Clinical Supervisor, 21, 145–160. doi:10.1300/J001v21n02_10
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection: A resource handbook. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E. (1987). Multiple roles, stress and well-being among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 23, 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E. (2003). Comparison of faculty ratings of applicants and background characteristics as predictors of performance in an MSW program. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(1/2), 35–54. doi:10.1300/J067v23n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., Green, R. G., & Kolevzon, M. S. (1987). In search of the continuum: Graduate school performance of BSW and non-BSW degree holders. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 14, 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., Lee, M., & Cavazos, A. (2007). Does practice make perfect? Practicing professional skills and outcomes in social work field education. Clinical Supervisor, 26, 239–263. doi:10.1300/J001v26n01_15
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and field performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 111–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J., & Gray, M. (2004). Critical thinking as integral to social work practice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(1/2), 19–38. doi:10.1300/J067v24n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L., Gambrill, E., Blakemore, J., Begun, A., Keniston, A., Peden, B., & Lefcowitz, J. (1995). A measure of critical thinking about practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 5, 193–204. doi:10.1177/104973159500500204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddings, M. M., & Vodde, R. (2003). A conceptual framework for foundation practicum and seminar. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(1/2), 123–145. doi:10.1300/J067v23n01_09
   Google Scholar
• Gockel, A., & Burton, D. L. (2014). An evaluation of prepracticum helping skills training for graduate social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 50, 101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., Franklin, J., & Langford, P. (2002). The Self-Reflection and Insight Scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 821–835. doi:10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gursansky, D., & Le Sueur, E. (2012). Conceptualising field education in the twenty-first century: Contradictions, challenges and opportunities. Social Work Education, 31, 914–931. doi:10.1080/02615479.2011.595784
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, R., & Loffredo, D. A. (2014). Insight, rumination, and self-reflection as predictors of well-being. Journal of Psychology, 145, 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, H., & Myers, D. (2013). Student perceptions of integrative field seminar: A comparison of three models. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 3(2), 42–54. doi:10.5929/2013.3.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Heggen, K., & Terum, L. I. (2013). Coherence in professional education: Does it foster dedication and identification? Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 656–669. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.774352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, T., & Lewicki, P. (2006). Statistics: Methods and applications: A comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Cuzzi, L., Rutter, S., Rosenberg, G., & Chernack, P. (1996). The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: Initial development. Research on Social Work Practice, 6, 353–365. doi:10.1177/104973159600600306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lay, K., & McGuire, L. (2010). Building a lens for critical reflection and reflexivity in social work education. Social Work Education, 29, 539–550. doi:10.1080/02615470903159125
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Fortune, A. E. (2013). Do we need more “doing” activities or “thinking” activities in the field practicum? Journal of Social Work Education, 49, 446–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, R., Jones, K., Leigh, S., & Gay, C. (2010). Surviving your social work placement. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mary, N. L., & Herse, M. H. (1993). What do field seminars accomplish? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 6(2), 59–73. doi:10.1300/J067v06n02_06
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (1993, March). Development of a comprehensive direct practice evaluation instrument. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Kansas City, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, G., & Calderon, L. (2015, October). Interactive field seminars: Five amazing exercises to create dynamic and deep learning. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Pack, M. (2014). Practice journeys: Using online reflective journals in social work fieldwork education. Reflective Practice, 15, 404–412. doi:10.1080/14623943.2014.883304
   Google Scholar
• Poe, N. T., & Hunter, C. A. (2009). A curious curriculum component: The nonmandated “given” of field seminar. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 14(2), 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. S., Wayne, J., & Bogo, M. (2008). Revisiting field education standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 173–188. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2008.200600142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rishel, C. W., & Majewski, V. (2009). Student gains in self-efficacy in an advanced MSW curriculum: A customized model for outcomes assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 365–383. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2009.200800101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneller, D. P., & Brocato, J. (2011). Facilitating student learning, the assessment of learning, and curricular improvement through a graduate social work integrative seminar. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31, 178–194. doi:10.1080/08841233.2011.560532
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R. (2011). Randomized controlled studies and alternative designs in outcome studies: Challenges and opportunities. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 636–643. doi:10.1177/1049731511403324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spira, M., & Teigiser, K. (2010). Integrative seminar in a geriatric consortium. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 895–910. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teigiser, K. S. (2009). Field note: New approaches to generalist field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 139–146. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2009.200600056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. T., & Otis, M. D. (2010). Intrapsychic correlates of professional quality of life: Mindfulness, empathy, and emotional separation. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1, 83–98. doi: 10.5243/jsswr.2010.7
   Google Scholar
• Thomlison, R. J., & Seidl, F. W. (1974). An experiment in curriculum innovation in graduate social work education. Journal of Education for Social Work, 10(3), 93–98. doi:10.1080/00220612.1974.10671308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinton, L., & Wilke, D. J. (2011). Leniency bias in evaluating clinical social work student interns. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39, 288–295. doi:10.1007/s10615-009-0221-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden, T., & Brown, L. N. (1985). The integration seminar: A vehicle for joining theory and practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 21, 13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2006). Field notes: The need for radical change in field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 161–169. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2006.200400447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. N., Hurley, K., O’Brien, K., & DeGregorio, A. (2003). Development and validation of the Self-Awareness and Management Strategies (SAMS) Scales for therapists. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 40, 278–288. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.40.4.278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., & Kirk, M. (2009). Evaluation of empathy measurement tools in nursing: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 1790–1806. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05071.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar