411
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An Integrative Framework for Developing Comprehensive Examinations to Measure Student Social Work Competencies

Pages 436-447 | Accepted 02 Aug 2017, Published online: 11 Jul 2018

References

  • Astin, A. W., & Antonio, A. L. (2012). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Banta, T. W., Jones, E. A., & Black, K. E. (2009). Designing effective assessment: Principles and profiles of good practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bogo, M., Rawlings, M., & Johnson, B. (2013). Designing objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) to assess social work student competencies. Workshop presented at the 59th Annual Planning Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Dallas, TX.
  • Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Globerman, J. (2002). Evaluating a measure of student field performance in direct service: Testing reliability and validity of explicit criteria. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 385–401.
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2008-EPAS.aspx
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2015-EPAS
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Drisko, J. W. (2014). Competencies and their assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 50, 414–426.
  • Edwards, M. C. (2009). An introduction to item response theory using the need for cognition scale. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 507–529. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00194.x
  • Edwards, M. C., Wirth, R. J., Houts, C. R., & Xi, N. (2012). Categorical data in the structural equation modeling framework. In R. J. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 195–208). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Gambrill, E. D. (2001). Educational policy and accreditation standards: Do they work for clients? Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 226–239.
  • Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing test items to evaluate higher order thinking. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
  • McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence.” American Psychologist, 28, 1–14. doi:10.1037/h0034092
  • Millsap, R. E., & Olivera-Aguilar, M. (2012). Investigating measurement invariance using confirmatory factor analysis. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 380–392). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Patterson, D. A. (2006). A large-scale, asynchronous, Web-based MSW comprehensive exam administration: Outcomes and lessons learned. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 655–668. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2006.200500519
  • Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Regehr, C., Bogo, M., Donovan, K., Lim, A., & Regehr, G. (2012). Evaluating a scale to measure student competencies in macro social work practice. Journal of Social Service Research, 38, 100–109. doi:10.1080/01488376.2011.616756
  • Rodriguez, M. C. (2005). Three options are optimal for multiple‐choice items: A meta‐analysis of 80 years of research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(2), 3–13. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00006.x
  • Stoesz, D., & Karger, H. J. (2009). Reinventing social work accreditation. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 104–111. doi:10.1177/1049731507313976
  • Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Shavelson, R. J., & Kuhn, C. (2015). The international state of research on measurement of competency in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 393–411. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1004241

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.