The Field Instructor Supervision Scale

References

• Abbott, A., & Lyter, S. (1999). The use of constructive criticism in field supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 17(2), 43–57. doi:10.1300/J001v17n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Alperin, D. E. (1998). Factors related to student satisfaction with child welfare field placements. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 43–54. doi:10.1080/10437797.1998.10778904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Barretti, M. A. (2009). Ranking desirable field instructor characteristics: viewing student preferences in context with field and class experience. The Clinical Supervisor, 28, 47–71. doi:10.1080/07325220902855128
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 3(2), 77–85. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy, B., Leung, A. Y., Tarn, T. S., & Chu, C. (1998). Roles and tasks of field instructors as perceived by Chinese social work students. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 16(1/2), 115–132. doi:10.1300/J067v16n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Coohey, C., French, L., & Dickinson, R. (2017). Core field instructor behaviors that facilitate student learning. Field Educator Journal, 7(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2013). 2008 EPAS handbook (updated 2013). Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/2008EPASHandbook.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, M. L. (1994). Critical field instructor behaviors: Student and field instructor views. Arete, 18(2), 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Erera, I., & Lazar, A. (1994). Operationalizing Kadushin’s model of social work supervision. Journal of Social Service Research, 18, 109–122. doi:10.1300/J079v18n03_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, E. (1998). Student perceptions of satisfaction with practicum learning. Social Work Education, 17, 173–201. doi:10.1080/02615479811220181
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., & Abramson, J. S. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 95–110. doi:10.1300/J001v11n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., Feathers, S. R. R., Scrimenti, R. M., Smollen, P., Stemerman, B., & Tucker, E. L. (1985). Student satisfaction with field placement. Journal of Social Work Education, 23, 92–104. doi:10.1080/10437797.1985.10671717
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 111–124. doi:10.1080/10437797.2001.10779040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandolfo, R., & Brown, R. (1987). Psychology intern ratings of actual and ideal supervision and psychotherapy. Journal of Training and Practice in Professional Psychology, 1, 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988. doi:10.1177/014920639502100509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Anastas, J., & Meenaghan, T. (2003). Determining attainment of the EPAS foundation program objectives: Evidence for the use of self-efficacy as an outcome. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 425–440. doi:10.1080/10437797.2003.10779147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Anastas, J., & Meenaghan, T. (2005). EPAS objectives and foundation practice self-efficacy: A replication. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 559–570. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2005.200404118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Barker, K., Kuppens, S., & Rosenberg, G. (2015). Self-efficacy regarding social work competencies. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 428–437.
   Google Scholar
• Hutt, C. H., Scott, J., & King, M. (1983). A phenomenological study of supervisees’ positive and negative experiences in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 20(1), 118–123. doi:10.1037/h0088471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A. (1976). Supervision in social work practice. New York, NY: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanno, H., & Koeske, G. F. (2010). MSW students’ satisfaction with their field placements: The role of preparedness and supervision quality. Journal of Social Work Education, 46, 23–38. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2010.200800066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (1996). A study of MSW and BSW students’ perceptions of their field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 32, 399–414. doi:10.1080/10437797.1996.10778470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2000). Engaging the student in the field instruction relationship: BSW and MSW students’ views. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20(3/4), 173–201. doi:10.1300/J067v20n03_12
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students’ views of effective field supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 357–379. doi:10.1080/10437797.2001.10779060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar, A., & Eisikovits, Z. (1997). Social work students’ preferences regarding supervisory styles and supervisor’s behavior. The Clinical Supervisor, 16(1), 25–37. doi:10.1300/J001v16n01_02
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers & Association of Social Work Boards. (2013). Best practice standards in social work supervision. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=GBrLbl4BuwI%3d&portalid=0
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. A. (2010). The Work Self-Efficacy Inventory survey: Instruments, scoring guides and individual planning and development. Retrieved from www.mindgarden.com
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L., Robinson, E., & Luckyj, A. (1981). A study of the content, context, and skills of supervision. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Sinicrope, R. F., & Cournoyer, D. E. (1990). Validity of student ratings of field instruction. Journal of Social Work Education, 26, 266–272. doi:10.1080/10437797.1990.10672158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate analysis. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A., Sowers-Hoag, K. M., & Love, J. P. (1986). The influence of field instructor-student gender combinations on student perceptions of field instruction quality. Arete, 11(2), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A., Williams, M., Love, J. P., & Sowers-Hoag, K. M. (1989). The MSW supervisory requirement in field instruction: Does it make a difference? The Clinical Supervisor, 6(3/4), 249–256. doi:10.1300/J001v06n03_18
   Google Scholar
• Towle, C. (1963). The place of help in supervision. Social Service Review, 37, 403–415. doi:10.1086/641498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar