References
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
- Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
- Barth, R. P., Gilmore, G. C., Flynn, M. S., Fraser, M. W., & Brekke, J. S. (2014). The American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare: History and grand challenges. Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 495–500. doi:10.1177/1049731514527801
- Berzin, S. C., Singer, J., & Chan, C. (2015). Practice innovation through technology in the digital age: A grand challenge for social work. Retrieved from http://aaswsw.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Practice-Innovation-through-Technology-in-the-Digital-Age-A-Grand-Challenge-for-Social-Work-GC-Working-Paper-No-12.pdf
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Retrieved from http://www.ulib.iupui.edu/cgibin/proxy.pl?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.5EF797A3&site=eds-live
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2013). Telehealth services. Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/TelehealthSrvcsfctsht.pdf
- Council on Social Work Education Futures Task Force. (2018). Envisioning the future of social work. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/About-CSWE/Governance/Board-of-Directors/2018-19-Strategic-Planning-Process/CSWE-FTF-Four-Futures-for-Social-Work-FINAL-2.aspx
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Ellen, P. S., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (1991). Resistance to technological innovations: An examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 297–307. doi:10.1007/BF02726504
- Herie, M., & Martin, G. W. (2002). Knowledge diffusion in social work: A new approach to bridging the gap. Social Work, 47, 85–95. doi:10.1093/sw/47.1.85
- Holden, G., Meenaghan, T., Anastas, J., & Metrey, G. (2002). Outcomes of social work education: The case for social work self-efficacy. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 115–133. doi:10.1080/10437797.2002.10779086
- National Association of Social Workers. (2015). Mental health. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/pressroom/features/issue/mental.asp
- Olson, J. D., & Appun, F. D. (2017). The technology adoption process model and self-efficacy of distance education students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(2), 57–75.
- Perron, B. E., Taylor, H. O., Glass, J., & Margerum-Leys, J. (2010). Information and communication technologies in social work. Advances in Social Work, 11, 67–81.
- Ramsey, A. T., & Montgomery, K. (2014). Technology-based interventions in social work practice: A systematic review of mental health interventions. Social Work in Health Care, 53, 883–899. doi:10.1080/00981389.2014.925531
- Reamer, F. G. (2013). Social work in a digital age: Ethical and risk management challenges. Social Work, 58, 163–173. doi:10.1093/sw/swt003
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
- Rogers, E. M. (2010). A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. Journal of Health Communications: International Perspectives, 9(51), 12–19. doi:10.1080/10810730490271449
- Schoech, D. (2008). Technology: Overview. In T. Mizrahi & L. E. Davis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www-oxfordreference-com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/view/10.1093/acref/9780195306613.001.0001/acref-9780195306613-e-390
- Tsai, C.-H. (2014). Integrating social capital theory, social cognitive theory, and the technology acceptance model to explore a behavioral model of telehealth systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 4905–4925. doi:10.3390/ijerph110504905