Reducing Ableism in Social Work Education Through Universal Design for Learning and Policy

References

• American Psychological Association. (2019). Reasonable accommodations explained. https://www.apa.org/pi/disability/dart/toolkit-three
   Google Scholar
• Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328. (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act (ADAAA) of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3553 (to be codified in scattered sections of 29 and 42 U.S.C.). (n.d.)
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, L. (2018). Disability with dignity: Justice, human rights and equal status. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnar-Brak, L., Lectenberger, D., & Lan, W. Y. (2010). Accommodation strategies of college students with disabilities. The Qualitative Report, 15(2), 411–429. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-2/barnard-brak.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bean, K. F., & Krcek, T. E. (2012). The integration of disability content into social work education: An examination of infused and dedicated models. Advances in Social Work, 13(3), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.18060/2131
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., & Leigh, J. (2018). Ableism in academia: Where are the disabled and ill academics? Disability & Society, 33(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1455627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. (2017). Equal access: Universal design of instruction. University of Washington. https://www.washington.edu/doit/equal-access-universal-design-instruction
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. M. (1996). Academic freedom and the Canadian university. Research File, 1(3), n3.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. A. K. (2008). Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disability & Society, 23(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701841190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Applied Special Technology. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org/
   Google Scholar
• Cole, B. S., & Cain, M. W. (1996). Social work students with disabilities: A proactive approach to accommodation. Journal of Social Work Education, 32(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1996.10778465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2021). Council on disability and persons with disabilities charge. https://cswe.org/Centers-Initiatives/Center-for-Diversity/About/Commission-for-Diversity-and-Social-and-Economic-J/Council-on-Disability-and-Persons-with-Disabilitie/CDPD-Charge.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Couzens, D., Poed, S., Kataoka, M., Brandon, A., Hartley, J., & Keen, D. (2015). Support for students with hidden disabilities in universities: A case study. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.984592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallas, B. K., Sprong, M. E., & Upton, T. D. (2014). Post-secondary faculty attitudes toward inclusive teaching strategies. Journal of Rehabilitation, 80(2), 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePoy, E., Gilson, S. F., MacDuffie, H. L., & Meyershon, K. (2002). Integrating disability content in social work education: A curriculum resource. Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. T. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., Broido, E. M., Brown, K. R., & Wilke, A. K. (2017). Disability in higher education: A social justice approach. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act. (2015). Pub. L. No. 114-95. In 114th Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, S. F., & DePoy, E. (2002). Theoretical approaches to disability content in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(1), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2002.10779088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (2006). Academic freedom under fire: The case for critical pedagogy. College Literature, 33(4), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2006.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. T., Gravel, J. W., & Schifter, L. A. (2009). A policy reader in universal design for learning. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017). Higher education students with disabilities speaking out: Perceived barriers and opportunities of the universal design for learning framework. Disability & Society, 32(10), 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1365695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Opportunity Act. Pub. L. No. 110-315. (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheon, E. J., & Wolbring, G. (2012). Voices of “disabled” post secondary students: Examining higher education “disability” policy using an ableism lens. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, H.R. 1350, 108th Congress. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, A. S. (2019). Let’s try again: why the United States should ratify the United Nations convention on the rights of people with disabilities. Touro Law Review, 35, 301. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373259
   Google Scholar
• Kattari, S. K. (2015). Examining ableism in higher education through social dominance theory and social learning theory. Innovative Higher Education, 40(5), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9320-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattari, S. K., Ingarfield, L., Hanna, M., McQueen, J., & Ross, K. (2019). Uncovering issues of ableism in social work education: A disability needs assessment. Social Work Education 39(5) , 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1699526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattari, S. K., Lavery, A., & Hasche, L. (2017). Applying a social model of disability across the life span. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 27(8), 865–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2017.1344175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattari, S. K., Olzman, M., & Hanna, M. D. (2018). You look fine!” Ableist experiences by people with invisible disabilities. Affilia, 33(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0886109918778073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, J., Parish, S. L., Scheyett, A. M., & Egan, C. (2010). Preparation of social workers to support people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30(3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2010.497128
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, E., & Gibson, P. (2005). Universal instructional design: A new framework for accommodating students in social work courses. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2005.200303129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackelprang, R. W. (2010). Disability controversies: Past, present, and future. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 9(2–3), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536710X.2010.493475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackelprang, R. W., & Salsgiver, R. O. (2015). Disability: A diversity model approach in human service practice (3rd ed.). Lyceum.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, L., & Clifford, G. (2017). Admissions as a facilitator of inclusion—Not a gatekeeper. Disability Compliance for Higher Education, 22(12), 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/dhe.30320
   Google Scholar
• Minich, J. A. (2016). Enabling whom? Critical disability studies now. Lateral, 5(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.25158/L5.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Moriña, A. (2017). Inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, M. J., & Brown, J. M. (2018). An ecological approach to modeling disability. Bioethics, 32(9), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1990, July 23). The individual and social models of disability. Paper presented at joint workshop of the Living Options Group and the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians, University of Leeds. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/Oliver-in-soc-dis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, J. (2015). Exploring the critiques of the social model of disability: The transformative possibility of Arendt’s notion of power. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardeck, J. T. (1999). Disability discrimination in social work education: Current issues for social work programs and faculty. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 19(1–2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v19n01_12
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Inclusive Higher Education Consortium. (2020). https://pihec.com/
   Google Scholar
• Poore-Pariseau, C. (2009). Should faculty members be exempt from a mandate to receive instructional design training because of their rights under academic freedom? Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(3), 223. doi:10.1007/s10805-009-9073-4
   Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504. Pub. L. No. 93-112, 87 Stat. 355. (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Russo-Gleicher, R. J. (2008). MSW programs: Gatekeepers to the field of developmental disabilities. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. S., Mcguire, J. M., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F07419325030240060801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serna, G. R., & Woulfe, R. (2017). Social reproduction and college access: Current evidence, context, and potential alternatives. Critical Questions in Education, 8(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 197–204). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology. Research in Social Science and Disability, 2(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. (2009). The diversity paradox: Does student diversity enhance or challenge excellence? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(4), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903266018
   Google Scholar
• Silver, P., Bourke, A., & Strehorn, K. C. (1998). Universal Instructional Design in higher education: An approach for inclusion. Equity & Excellence, 31(2), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1066568980310206
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. M. (2018). Americans With Disabilities: 2014. Current Population Reports, 70-152, U.S. Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• The Center for Universal Design (1997). The principles of universal design, version 2.0. North Carolina State University. https://projects.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. T. (2018). Reach everyone, teach everyone: Universal design for learning in higher education. West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2010). National education technology plan. Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017a). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National education technology plan update. Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017b). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education: A supplement to the national education technology plan. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (1975). https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/UPIAS-fundamental-principles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD). https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• University of Arizona Disability Resource Center. (2019). Universal design for learning—UDL. https://drc.arizona.edu/about/universal-design-learning-udl
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N., & Levine, P. (2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, R. (2007). Universal design across the curriculum. New Directions for Higher Education, 2007(137), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.244
   Google Scholar