Knowledge technological proximity: evidence from US and European patents

References

• Aldieri, L. 2011. “Technological and Geographical Proximity Effects on Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from the US Patent Citations.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20 (6): 597–609. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2011.554632
   Google Scholar
• Aldieri, L., and M. Cincera. 2009. “Geographic and Technological R&D Spillover Within the Triad: Micro Evidence from US Patents.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 34 (2): 196–211. doi: 10.1007/s10961-007-9065-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, T., and A. Leiponen. 2012. “A Measure of Technological Distance.” Economics Letters 116 (3): 457–459. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzel, Y. 1968. “Optimal Timing of Innovation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 50 (3): 348–355. doi: 10.2307/1937928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M., and J. Waldfogel. 2008. “Close to You? Bias and Precision in Patent-based Measures of Technological Proximity.” Research Policy 37 (9): 1556–1567. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capron, H., and M. Cincera. 1998. “Exploring the Spillover Impact on Productivity of World-wide Manufacturing Firms.” Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 49–50 (January–June): 565–587.
   Google Scholar
• Cincera, M. 1998. “Economic and Technological Performances of International Firms.” PhD diss., Université Libre de Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Cincera, M., and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. 2001. “International R&D Spillovers: A Survey.” Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles 169 (169): 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, H. 2003. “Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management.” World Patent Information 25 (3): 233–242. doi: 10.1016/S0172-2190(03)00077-2
   Google Scholar
• Gallini, N. 1992. “Patent Policy and Costly Imitation.” RAND Journal of Economics 23 (1): 52–63. doi: 10.2307/2555432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallini, N. 2002. “The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U. S. Patent Reform.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (2): 131–154. doi: 10.1257/0895330027292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, R., and C. Shapiro. 1990. “Optimal Patent Length and Breadth.” RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1): 106–112. doi: 10.2307/2555497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., R. Harrison, and J. Van Reenen. 2006. “How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of US R&D Spillovers on UK Firms as a Test of Technology Sourcing.” American Economic Review 96 (5): 1859–1875. doi: 10.1257/aer.96.5.1859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth.” Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 92–116. doi: 10.2307/3003321
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1990. “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 28 (4): 1661–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1992. “The Search for R&D Spillovers.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (Supplement): 29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G., and E. Lai. 2004. “International Protection of Intellectual Property.” American Economic Review 94 (5): 1635–1653. doi: 10.1257/0002828043052312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2001. “The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools.” Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1986. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value.” American Economic Review 76 (5): 984–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1988. “R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70 (3): 431–437. doi: 10.2307/1926781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1989. “Characterizing the ‘Technological Position’ of Firms, with Application to Quantifying Technological Opportunity and Research Spillovers.” Research Policy 18 (2): 87–97. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(89)90007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. “Geographic Localization of Lnowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 577–598. doi: 10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemperer, P. 1990. “How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection be?” RAND Journal of Economics 29 (1): 113–130. doi: 10.2307/2555498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lychagin, S., J. Pinkse, M. E. Slade, and J. Van Reenen. 2010. “Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?” Working Paper 16188, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Maraut, S., H. Dernis, C. Webb, V. Spiezia, and D. Guellec. 2008. “The OECD REGPAT Database: A Presentation.” STI Working Paper 2008/2, OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Maurseth, P. B., and B. Verspagen. 2002. “Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citation Analysis.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104 (4): 531–545. doi: 10.1111/1467-9442.00300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P. 1996. “R&D Externalities and Productivity Growth.” STI Review 18: 39–66.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. 1969. Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue, T. 1998. “A Patentability Requirement for Sequential Innovation.” RAND Journal of Economics 29 (4): 654–679. doi: 10.2307/2556088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, REGPAT database (accessed January 1, 2012). ftp://prese:[email protected]/REGPAT_201301/.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M. J. 2004. “Measuring Spillovers from Industrial R&D: On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity.” Rand Journal of Economics 35 (4): 777–786. doi: 10.2307/1593773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakes, A., and Z. Griliches. 1984. “Patents and the R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look.” In R&D, Patents and Productivity, edited by Z. Griliches, 55–72. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. 2011. “The Quality Factor in Patent Systems.” Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (6): 1755–1793. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtr066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1972. “Nordhaus Theory of Optimal Patent Life: A Geometric Reinterpretation.” American Economic Review 62 (3): 422–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 2002. “The Economics of Human Gene Patents.” Academic Medicine 77 (12 part 2): 1348–1367. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200212001-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotchmer, S. 1991. “Standing on the Shoulder of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 29–41. doi: 10.1257/jep.5.1.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zeebroeck, N., and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. 2011. “Filing Strategies and Patent Value.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20 (6): 539–561. doi: 10.1080/10438591003668646
   Google Scholar