A spatial analysis of R&D: the role of industry proximity

REFERENCES

• Adams, J. D., and A. B. Jaffe. 1996. “Bounding the Effects of R&D: An Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data.” Rand Journal of Economics 27 (4): 700–721. doi: 10.2307/2555878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiello, F., and P. Cardamone. 2008. “R&D Spillovers and Firms’ Performance in Italy: Evidence from a Flexible Production Function.” Empirical Economics 34 (1): 143–166. doi: 10.1007/s00181-007-0174-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldieri, L. 2011. “Technological and Geographical Proximity Effects on Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from the US Patent Citations.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20 (6): 597–607. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2011.554632
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, M., and U. Gråsjö. 2009. “Spatial Dependence and the Representation of Space in Empirical Models.” The Annals of Regional Science 43 (1): 159–180. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0211-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., and A. K. Bera. 1998. “Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics.” In Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, edited by D. Giles and A. Ullah, 237–289. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., and R. Florax. 1995. “Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results.” In New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, edited by Luc Anselin and Raymond Florax, 75–95. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C. 1994. “Technological Districts Localized Spillovers and Productivity Growth. The Italian Evidence on Technological Externalities in the Core Regions.” International Review of Applied Economics 8 (1): 18–30. doi: 10.1080/758529650
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C., P. P. Patrucco, and F. Quatraro. 2008. “The Governance of Localized Knowledge Externalities.” International Review of Applied Economics 22 (4): 479–498. doi: 10.1080/02692170802137661
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. 1962. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” Review of Economic Studies 29 (3): 155–173. doi: 10.2307/2295952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and M. Feldman. 1996. “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” American Economic Review 86 (3): 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelsman, E. J., R.J. Caballero, and R. K. Lyons. 1994. “Customer and Supplier Driven Externalities.” American Economic Review 84 (4): 1075–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. I. 1988. “Costs of Production, Intra- and Interindustry R&D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence.” Canadian Journal of Economics 21 (2): 324–347. doi: 10.2307/135304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. I., and M. I. Nadiri. 1989. “Research and Development and Intra-Industry Spillovers: An Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality.” Review of Economic Studies 56 (2): 249–269. doi: 10.2307/2297460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, L., and G. Peri. 2003. “Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from 23 European Patent Data.” European Economic Review 47 (4): 687–710. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capitalia Bank. 2005. Indagine sulle imprese manifatturiere. Rapporto sull'industria italiana e sulla politica industriale. Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Carboni, O. A. 2011. “R&D Subsidies and Private R&D Expenditures: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Data.” International Review of Applied Economics 25 (4): 414–439. doi: 10.1080/02692171.2010.529427
   Google Scholar
• Carboni, O. A. 2012. “An Empirical Investigation of the Determinants of R&D Cooperation: An Application of the Inverse Hyperbolic Sine Transformation.” Research in Economics 66 (2): 131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2012.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Carboni, O. A. 2013a. “Spatial and Industry Proximity in Collaborative Research: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms.” The Journal of Technology Transfer, in press. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9279-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carboni, O. A. 2013b. “Heterogeneity in R&D Collaboration: An Empirical Investigation.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 25 (June): 48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Cliff, A., and J. K. Ord. 1981. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, D. T., and E. Helpman. 1995. “International R&D Spillovers.” European Economic Review 39 (5): 859–887. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(94)00100-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D. 2006. “Research and Development in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: The Role of Financial Constraints and Public Funding.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 53 (3): 335–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.2006.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. K., and J. E. Stiglitz. 1977. “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” American Economic Review 67 (3): 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drukker, D. M., P. Egger, and I. R. Prucha. 2010. “On Two-step Estimation of a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances and Endogenous Regressors.” Technical report, Department of Economics, University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Drukker, D. M., H. Peng, I. R. Prucha, and R. Raciborski. 2011. “Creating and Managing Spatial-Weighting Matrices Using the Spmat Command.” Technical report, Stata.
   Google Scholar
• Drukker, D. M., I. R. Prucha, and R. Raciborski. 2011. “A Command for Estimating Spatial-Autoregressive Models with Spatial-Autoregressive Disturbances and Additional Endogenous Variables.” Technical report, Stata.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, G., E. L. Glaeser, and W. R. Kerr. 2007. “What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns.” Harvard Business School: Working Papers: 07-064.
   Google Scholar
• Florax, R., and H. Folmer. 1992. “Specification and Estimation of Spatial Linear Regression Models: Monte Carlo Evaluation of Pre-Test Estimators.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 22 (3): 405–432. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(92)90037-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funke, M., and A. Niebuhr. 2005. “Regional R&D Spillovers and Economic Growth Evidence from West Germany.” Regional Studies 39 (1): 143–154. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000321904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., J. Kolko, and A. Saiz. 2001. “Consumer City.” Journal of Economic Geography 1 (1): 27–50. doi: 10.1093/jeg/1.1.27
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth.” Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 92–116. doi: 10.2307/3003321
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1992. “The Search for R&D Spillovers.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (Suppl.): 29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1998. R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 1990. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 1991. “Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth.” European Economic Review 35 (2–3): 517–526. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(91)90153-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumprecht, D. 2007. “R&D Spillovers: A Non-spatial and a Spatial Examination.” Austrian Journal of Statistics 36 (1): 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Haining, R. P. 2003. Spatial Data Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. I. D., and Q. C. Li. 2009. “Exporting, R&D and Absorptive Capacity in UK Establishments.” Oxford Economic Papers 61 (1): 74–103. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpn011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., J. Moffat, and V. Kravtsova. 2011. “In Search of ‘W’.” Spatial Economic Analysis 6 (3): 249–270. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2011.586721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hordijk, L. 1974. “Spatial Correlation in the Disturbances of Spatial Correlation in the Disturbances of a Linear Interregional Model.” Regional and Urban Economics 4 (2): 117–140. doi: 10.1016/0034-3331(74)90025-6
   Google Scholar
• ISTAT. 2004. Il nuovo sistema input–output [The New Input–Output System]. Roma: ISTAT.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1988. “R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70 (3): 431–437. doi: 10.2307/1926781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1989. “Characterising the ‘Technological Position’ of Firms, with Applications to Quantifying Technological Opportunity and Research Spillovers.” Research Policy 18 (2): 87–97. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(89)90007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Flows as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CVIII: 577–598. doi: 10.2307/2118401
   Google Scholar
• Kelejian, H. H., and I. R. Prucha. 2010. “Specification and Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models with Autoregressive and Heteroskedastic Disturbances.” Journal of Econometrics 140 (1): 53–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, W. 2002a. “Trade and the Transmission of Technology.” Journal of Economic Growth 7 (1): 5–24. doi: 10.1023/A:1013461025733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, W. 2002b. “Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion.” American Economic Review 92 (1): 120–42. doi: 10.1257/000282802760015630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenders, R. Th. A. J. 2002. “Modelling Social Influence Through Network Autocorrelation: Constructing the Weight Matrix.” Social Networks 24 (1): 21–47. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00049-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J., and K. Pace. 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Los, B., and B. Verspagen. 2000. “R&D Spillovers and Productivity: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Microdata.” Empirical Economics 25 (1): 127–148. doi: 10.1007/s001810050007
   Google Scholar
• Macdissi, C., and S. Negassi. 2002. “International R&D Spillovers: An Empirical Study.” Economics of Innovation and New Technologies 11 (2): 77–91. doi: 10.1080/10438590210897
   Google Scholar
• Marrocu, E., R. Paci, and S. Usai. 2011. “The Complementary Effects of Proximity Dimensions on Knowledge Spillovers.” WP CREnoS 2011/21.
   Google Scholar
• Medda, G., and C. A. Piga. 2007. “Technological Spillovers and Productivity in Italian Manufacturing Firms.” Loughborough University, WP 2007-16.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, P. 1950. “A Test for Serial Independence of Residuals.” Biometrika 37 (1–2): 178–181. doi: 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. J., and D. S. Siegel. 1999. “Scale Economies and Industry Agglomeration Externalities: A Dynamic Cost Function Approach.” American Economic Review 89 (1): 272–290. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.1.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadiri, I. M. 1993. “Innovations and Technological Spillovers.” NBER Working Paper, 4423.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 1996. Technology and Industrial Performance. Technology Diffusion, Productivity, Employment and Skills, International Competitiveness. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M. J. 2004. “Measuring Spillovers from Industrial R&D: On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity.” The RAND Journal of Economics 35 (4): 777–786. doi: 10.2307/1593773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peri, G. 2005. “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (2): 308–322. doi: 10.1162/0034653053970258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piga, C. A., and J. Poyago-Theotoky. 2005. “Endogenous R&D Spillovers and Locational Choice.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 35 (2): 127–139. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisati, M. 2001. “Tools for Spatial Data Analysis.” Stata Technical Bulletin 60 (March): 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy XCVIII: S71–S103. doi: 10.1086/261725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. S., and W. C. Strange. 2001. “The Determinants of Agglomeration.” Journal of Urban Economics 50, 191–229. doi: 10.1006/juec.2001.2230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1982. “Inter-Industrial Technology Flows and Productivity Growth.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (4): 627–634. doi: 10.2307/1923947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terleckyj, N. E. 1974. Effects of R&D on the Productivity Growth of Industries: An Exploratory Study. Washington, DC: National Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Terleckyj, N. E. 1980. “Direct and Indirect Effects of Industries Research and Development on the Productivity Growth of Industries.” In New Development in Productivity Measurement, edited by W. Kendrick and B. Vaccara, Chapt. 6, 357–386. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1970. “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region.” Economic Geography 46 (2): 234–240. doi: 10.2307/143141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vor, F., and H. L. F. de Groot. 2010. “Agglomeration Externalities and Localized Employment Growth: The Performance of Industrial Sites in Amsterdam.” The Annals of Regional Science 44 (3): 409–431. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0272-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, E. N., and M. I. Nadiri. 1993. “Spillover Effects, Linkage Structure, and Research and Development.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 4 (2): 315–331. doi: 10.1016/0954-349X(93)90022-C
   Google Scholar