Restless capitalism and the economizing entrepreneur

REFERENCES

• Abernathy, W. J., and J. M. Utterback. 1978. “Patterns of Innovation in Industry.” Technology Review 80 (7): 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbage, C. 1832. “The Economy of Manufactures and Machinery.” In The Works of Charles Babbage, edited by M. Campbell-Kelly Vol. VIII, 131–163. London: Pickeling.
   Google Scholar
• Beniger, J. 1986. The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buenstorf, G. 2007. “Creation and Pursuit of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: An Evolutionary Economics Perspective.” Small Business Economics 28 (4): 323–337. doi: 10.1007/s11187-006-9039-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. 1965. “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution.” In Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory, edited by H. R. Barringer, G. I. Blanksten, and R. W. Mack, 19–49. Cambridge: Schenkman.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. 1974. “Evolutionary Epistemology.” In The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper, edited by P. A. Schilpp, 412–463. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, H. B. 1990. “Schumpeterian and Austrian Entrepreneurship: Unity within Duality.” Journal of Business Venturing 5 (6): 341–347. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(90)90010-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, R., and J. S. Metcalfe. 2002. “Innovation in Pharmaceuticals: Perspectives on the Co-Ordination, Combination and Creation of Capabilities.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14 (3): 261–271. doi: 10.1080/095373202200002104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. 1982. “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change.” Research Policy 11 (3): 147–162. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhaime, I. M., and C. R. Schwenk. 1985. “Conjectures on Cognitive Simplification in Acquisition and Divestment Decision Making.” Academy of Management Review 10 (2): 287–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, G. 1991. “Deregulation, Innovative Entry and Structural Diversity as a Source of Stable and Rapid Economic Growth.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1 (1): 49–63. doi: 10.1007/BF01202338
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, W. B. 1985. “A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation.” Academy of Management Review 10 (4): 696–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4 (13): 33–54. doi: 10.2307/2548786
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1945/1948. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” In Individualism and Economic Order, edited by F. A. Hayek, 77–91. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmén, M., M. Magnusson, and M. McKelvey. 2007. “What are Innovative Opportunities?” Industry and Innovation 14 (1): 27–45. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130830
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C., J. A. Nickerson, and T. R. Zenger. 2007. “Opportunity Discovery, Problem Solving and a Theory of the Entrepreneurial Firm.” Journal of Management Studies 44 (7): 12–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00725.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. 1997. “Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach.” Journal of Economic Literature 35 (1): 60–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, Israel M. 1979. Perception, Opportunity, and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. [1921] 1940. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston, MA, Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Company, The Riverside Press Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. 1978. Capital and Its Structure. 2nd ed. Kansas City, MO: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, G. 1995. “A Note on the Concept of ‘problem’.” Organization Studies 16 (2): 315–343. doi: 10.1177/017084069501600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. A., and R. R. Maxfield. 2005. “Ontological Uncertainty and Innovation.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics15 (1): 3–50. doi: 10.1007/s00191-004-0227-7
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, R. N. 1999. “Scale, Scope and the Reuse of Knowledge.” In Economic Organization and Economic Knowledge: Essays in Honour of Brian J. Loasby, edited by B. J. Loasby, S. C. Dow, and P. E. Earl, Vol. 1, 239–254. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, R. N. 2001. “Knowledge, Consumption and Endogenous Growth.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11 (1): 77–93. doi: 10.1007/PL00003858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, P. 1996. “Time, Change and Complexity: Ludwig M. Lachmann's Contributions to the Theory of Capital.” In Advances in Austrian Economics, edited by Peter Boettke and D. Prychitko, Vol. 3, 107–165. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. B., and S. Asaba. 2006. “Why do Firms Imitate each Other?” Academy of Management Review 31 (2): 366–385. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. 1976. Choice, Complexity and Ignorance. An Enquiry into Economic Theory and the Practice of Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. 1999a. Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. 1999b. “The Significance of Penrose's Theory for the Development of Economics.” Contributions to Political Economy 18 (1): 31–45. doi: 10.1093/cpe/18.1.31
   Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. 2000. “Decision Premises, Decision Cycles and Decomposition.” Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (4): 709–731. doi: 10.1093/icc/9.4.709
   Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. 2001. “Time, Knowledge and Evolutionary Dynamics: Why Connections Matter.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11 (4): 393–412.
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., L. P. Cooper, and O. E. Neece. 2004. “Knowledge Reuse for Innovation.” Management Science 50 (2): 174–188. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. A. 2006. Strategizing, Disequilibrium and Profit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M., and M. Holmén. 2006. “Introduction.” In Flexibility and Stability in the Innovating Economy, edited by M. McKelvey, and M. Holmén, 1–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McMullen, J. S., and D. A. Shepherd. 2006. “Entrepreneurial Action and the Role of Uncertainty in the Theory of the Entrepreneur.” Academy of Management Review 31 (1): 132–152. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.19379628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger, C. [1871] 2007. Principles of Economics. Electronic online ed. Auburn, AL: Ludvig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. S. 2001. “Institutions and Progress.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (3): 561–586. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.3.561
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. S. 2002. “Knowledge of Growth and the Growth of Knowledge.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12 (1–2): 3–15. doi: 10.1007/s00191-002-0107-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. S., and R. Coombs. 2000. “Organizing for Innovation: Co-Ordinating Distributed Innovation Capabilities Capabilities.” In Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research, edited by N. Foss and V. Mahnke, 209–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. S., A. James, and A. Mina. 2005. “Emergent innovations and the Delivery of Clinical Services: The Case of Intra-Ocular Lenses.” Research Policy 34 (9): 1283–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. 2002. The Gifts of Athena. Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, P., and S. Ghoshal. 1999. “Markets, Firms, and the Process of Economic Development.” Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 390–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, P. 1998. “A Cognitive Model of Innovation.” Research Policy 27 (7): 689–709. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00078-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, P., T. Brady, A. Davies, and J. Hall. 2003. “Capacity Utilization Revisited: Software, Control and the Growth of Large Technical Systems.” Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (3): 477–517. doi: 10.1093/icc/12.3.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, R. R. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pounds, W. F. 1969. “The Process of Problem Finding.” Industrial Management Review 11: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, M. 1994. On the Job Learning in the Software Industry. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sæmundsson, R. S. and M. Holmén. 2011. “Yes, Now we can: Technological Change and the Exploitation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities.” Journal of High Technology Management Research 22 (2): 102–113.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasvathi, S. D. 2001. “Causation and Effectuation: Towards a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency.” Academy of Management Review 26 (2): 243–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. 2000. “Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities.” Organization Science 11 (4): 448–469. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., and S. Venkataraman. 2000. “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research.” Academy of Management Journal 25 (1): 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincenti, W. G. 1990. What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” The Economic Journal 38 (152): 527–542. doi: 10.2307/2224097
   Google Scholar