Knowledge spillovers and R&D subsidies to new, emerging technologies

References

• Acemoglu D. 2002. “Directed Technical Change.” Review of Economic Studies 69 (4): 781–809. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D., P. Aghion, L. Bursztyn, and D. Hemous. 2012. “The Environment and Directed Technical Change.” The American Economic Review 102 (1): 131–166. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion P., C. Harris, P. Howitt, and J. Vickers. 2001. “Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation.” Review of Economic Studies 68 (3): 467–492. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion P., and P. Howitt. 2006. “Joseph Schumpeter Lecture Appropriate growth Policy: A Unifying Framework.” Journal of the European Economic Association 4 (2–3): 269–314. doi: 10.1162/jeea.2006.4.2-3.269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d'Aspremont C., and A. Jacquemin. 1988. “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers.” The American Economic Review 78 (5): 1133–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atallah G. 2005. “R&D Cooperation with Asymmetric Spillovers.” Canadian Journal of Economcis 38 (3): 919–936. doi: 10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atallah G. 2014. “Conditional R&D Subsidies.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23 (2): 179–214. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2013.827904
   Google Scholar
• Bottazzi L., and G. Peri. 2003. “Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data.” European Economic Review 47 (4): 687–710. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J. R., G. Martinsson, and B. C. Petersen. 2012. “Do Financing Constraints Matter for R&D?” European Economic Review 56 (8): 1512–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu A. C. 2011. “The Welfare Cost of One-Size-Fits-All Patent Protection.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35 (6): 876–890. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2010.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt R., and I. Henriques. 1995. “Strategic Investment with Asymmetric Spillovers.” Canadian Journal of Economics 28 (3): 656–674. doi: 10.2307/136055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt R. 1997. “Spillovers and Innovative Activities.” International Journal of Industrial Organization15 (1): 1–28. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01023-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechezlepretre A., R. Martin, and M. Mohnen. 2013. “Knowledge Spillovers from Clean and Dirty Technologies: A Patent Citation Analysis.” Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 135, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Doi J., and K. Mino. 2005. “Technological Spillovers and Patterns of Growth with Sector-Specific R&D.” Journal of Macroeconomics 27 (4): 557–578. doi: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlagh R., S. Kverndokk, and K. E. Rosendahl. 2009. “Optimal Timing of Climate Change Policy: Interaction between Carbon Taxes and Innovation Externalities.” Environmental and Resource Economics 43 (3): 369–390. doi: 10.1007/s10640-009-9271-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlagh R., S. Kverndokk, and K. E. Rosendahl. 2011. Timing of Environmental R&D Policy. CREE Working Paper 2/2011, Oslo: CREE.
   Google Scholar
• Gong G., A. Greiner, and W. Semmler. 2004. “Endogenous Growth: Estimating the Romer Model for the US and Germany.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66 (2): 147–164. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-9049.2003.00082.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. 1995. “R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, edited by P. Stoneman, 52–89. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaud A., and L. Rouge. 2008. “Environment, Directed Technical Change and Economic Policy.” Environmental and Resource Economics 41 (4): 439–463. doi: 10.1007/s10640-008-9201-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heggedal T. R., and K. Jacobsen. 2011. “Timing of Innovation Policies when Carbon Emissions are Restricted: An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis.” Resource and Energy Economics 33 (4): 913–937. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., J. Mairesse, and P. Mohnen. 2010. “Measuring the Returns to R&D.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B.H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, 1033–1082. North-Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hart R. 2008. “The Timing of Taxes on CO Emissions when Technological Change is Endogenous.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2): 194–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones C. I. 1995. “R&D Based Models of Economic Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 103 (4): 759–84. doi: 10.1086/262002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones C. I. 1999. “Growth: With or Without Scale Effects.” The American Economic Review 89 (2): 139–144. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones C. I. 2005. “Growth and Ideas.” In Handbook of Economic Growth Volume 1B, edited by P. Aghion and S. N. Durlauf, 1063–1111. North-Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jones C. I., and J. C. Williams. 2000. “Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D.” Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1): 65–85. doi: 10.1023/A:1009826304308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klette T. J., J. Møen, and Z. Griliches. 2000. “Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconometric Evaluation Studies.” Research Policy 29 (4): 471–495. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00086-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kverndokk S., and K. E. Rosendahl. 2007. “Climate Policies and Learning by Doing: Impacts and Timing of Technology Subsidies.” Resource and Energy Economics 29 (1): 58–82. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C. W. 2000. “Endogenous vs. Semi-Endogenous Growth in a Two-R&D-Sector Model.” The Economic Journal 110 (462): 109–122. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C. W. 2002. “Growth and Scale Effects: The Role of Knowledge Spillovers.” Economic Letters 74 (2): 177–185. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00542-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen J. B. 2008. “Semi-endogenous Versus Schumpeterian Growth Models: Testing the Knowledge Production Function Using International Data.” Journal of Economic Growth 13 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s10887-007-9024-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura T. 2003. “Strategic R and D Investments with Uncertainty.” Economics Bulletin 12 (1): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mosel M. 2010. “Competition, Imitation, and R&D Productivity in a Growth Model with Sector-Specific Patent Protection.” CESifo Working Paper No. 3109, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Peretto P., and S. Smulders. 2002. “Technological Distance, Growth and Scale Effects.” The Economic Journal 112 (481): 603–624. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Sebastian F. 2007. “Public Support to Innovation and Imitation in a Non-scale Growth Model.” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 31 (12): 3791–3821. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2006.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessoa A. 2005. “Ideas Driven Growth: the OECD Evidence.” Portuguese Economic Journal 4 (1): 46–67. doi: 10.1007/s10258-005-0040-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp D. 2002. “Induced Innovation and Energy Prices.” The American Economic Review 92 (1): 160–180. doi: 10.1257/000282802760015658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter M. E., and S. Stern. 2000. Measuring the ‘ideas’ Production Function: Evidence from International Patent Output. Working Paper 7891. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Reis A. B., and D. A. Traca. 2008. “Spillovers and the Competitive Pressure for Long-run Innovation.” European Economic Review 52 (4): 589–610. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer P. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (5): S71–S102. doi: 10.1086/261725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segerstrom P. S. 2000. “The Long-Run Growth Effects of R&D Subsidies.” Journal of Economic Growth 5 (3): 277–305. doi: 10.1023/A:1009881717993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seierstad A., and K. Sydsæter. 1987. Optimal Control Theory with Economic Applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Smulders S., and T. van de Klundert. 1995. “Imperfect Competition, Concentration and Growth with Firm-specific R&D.” European Economic Review 39 (1): 139–160. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(94)E0072-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders S., and M. de Nooij. 2003. “The Impact of Energy Conservation on Technology and Economic Growth.” Resource and Energy Economics 25 (1): 59–79. doi: 10.1016/S0928-7655(02)00017-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strulik H. 2007. “Too Much of a Good Thing? The Quantitative Economics of R&D-driven Growth Revisited.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109 (2): 369–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2007.00499.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Klundert T., and S. Smulders. 1997. “Growth, Competition and Welfare.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 99 (1): 99–118. doi: 10.1111/1467-9442.00050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young A. 1998. “Growth Without Scale Effects.” Journal of Political Economy 106 (1): 41–63. doi: 10.1086/250002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar