The relative importance of human resource management practices for innovation

References

• Abraham, K. G., and S. K. Taylor. 1996. “Firms’ Use of Outside Contractors: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Labor Economics 14 (3): 394–424. doi: 10.1086/209816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, C. Lelarge, J. Van Reenen, and F. Zilibotti. 2007. “Technology, Information, and the Decentralization of the Firm.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (4): 1759–1799. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti, A. 1996. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Arvanitis, S., E. N. Loukis, and V. Diamantopoulou. 2013. “Are ICT, Workplace Organization and Human Capital Relevant for Innovation? A Comparative Study Based on Swiss and Greek Micro Data.” KOF Working Papers No. 333, Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Azoulay, P., and J. Lerner. 2013. “Technological Innovation and Organizations.” In Handbook of Organizational Economics, edited by R. Gibbons, and J. Roberts, 575–603. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, S. 2008. “Strategic Human Resource Practices and Product Innovation.” Organization Studies 29 (6): 821–847. doi: 10.1177/0170840608090530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. E., and L. M. Lynch. 2001. “How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity.” Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (3): 434–445. doi: 10.1162/00346530152480081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, M. 1999. “The Performance Effects of Pay Dispersion on Individuals and Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 42 (1): 25–40. doi: 10.2307/256872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., R. Sadun, and J. Van Reenen. 2010. “Recent Advances in the Empirics of Organizational Economics.” CEP Discussion Paper No. 970, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., R. Sadun, and J. Van Reenen. 2012. “Americans Do IT Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle.” American Economic Review 102 (1): 167–201. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.1.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., and J. Van Reenen. 2010. “Why Do Management Practices Differ across Firms and Countries?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (1): 203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T. F., and S. Greenstein. 1996. “Technological Progress and Co-invention in Computing and in the Uses of Computers.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1–78. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Projects/BPEA/1996-micro/1996_bpeamicro_bresnahan.PDF. doi: 10.2307/2534746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briody, B. 2012. “The New Workplace Trend: Goof off to Get Ahead”. The Fiscal Times, April 25.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and P. K. Trivedi. 2009. Microeconometrics Using Stata. London: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2002. “R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium.” American Economic Review 92 (4): 1169–1184. doi: 10.1257/00028280260344704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-C., H.-T. Chang, H.-R. Chi, M.-H. Chen, and L.-L. Deng. 2012. “How Do Established Firms Improve Radical Innovation Performance? The Organizational Capabilities View.” Technovation 32: 441–451. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M. 2010. “Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, Vol. 1, 129–213. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Cosh, A., X. Fu, and A. Hughes. 2012. “Organization Structure and Innovation Performance in Different Environments.” Small Business Economics 39: 301–317. doi: 10.1007/s11187-010-9304-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. 1998. “Incentives in Organizations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (4): 115–132. doi: 10.1257/jep.12.4.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, T., and T. Zwick. 2008. “New Technology, Work Organization, and Innovation.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 17 (4): 331–354. doi: 10.1080/10438590701279649
   Google Scholar
• Holmström, B. 1989. “Agency Costs and Innovation.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12: 305–327. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(89)90025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B., and P. Milgrom. 1994. “The Firm as an Incentive System.” American Economic Review 84 (4): 972–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huselid, M. A. 1995. “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (3): 635–672. doi: 10.2307/256741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, S., and C. Brewster. 1994. Flexibility at Work in Europe. Strategies and Practice. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ichniowski, C., T. A. Kochan, D. I. Levine, C. Olson, and G. Strauss. 2000. “What Works at Work: Overview and Assessment.” In The American Workplace. Skills, Compensation and Employee Involvement, edited by C. Ichiowski, D. I. Levine, C. Olson, and G. Strauss, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ichniowski, C., and K. Shaw. 2003. “Beyond Incentive Pay: Insiders’ Estimates of the Value of Complementary Human Resource Management Practices.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 155–180. doi: 10.1257/089533003321164994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichniowski, C., K. Shaw, and G. Prennushi. 1995. “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity.” NBER Working Paper Series 5333, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Ichniowski, C., K. Shaw, and G. Prennushi. 1997. “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines.” American Economic Review 87 (3): 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1995. “Specific and General Knowledge, and Organizational Structure.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 8: 4–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1995.tb00283.x
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., S. Wang, and S. Zhao. 2013. “Does HRM Facilitate Employee Creativity and Organizational Innovation? A Study of Chinese Firms.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 23 (19): 4025–4047. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2012.690567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski, H., L. Marengo, and I. Mäkinen. 2012. “Firm Size, Managerial Practices and Innovativeness: Some Evidence from Finnish Manufacturing.” International Journal of Technology Management 59 (1/2): 92–115. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2012.047251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraaijebrink, J., J.-C. Spender, and A. J. Groen. 2010. “The Resource-based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques.” Journal of Management 36 (1): 349–372. doi: 10.1177/0149206309350775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and N. F. Foss. 2003. “New Human Resource Management Practices, Complementarities and the Impact on Innovation Performance.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27: 243–263. doi: 10.1093/cje/27.2.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and N. F. Foss. 2014. “Human Resource Management Practices and Innovation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, edited by M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, and N. Phillips, 505–529. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., and B. Choi. 2003. “Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination.” Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (1): 179–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengnick-Hall, S. 1992. “Innovation and Competitive Advantage: What We Know and What We Need to Learn.” Journal of Management 18 (2): 399–429. doi: 10.1177/014920639201800209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard, S. 2011. “Standards for Standardized Logistic Regression Coefficients.” Social Forces 89 (4): 1409–1428. doi: 10.1093/sf/89.4.1409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, J., and M. Sheehan. 1999. “HRM Practices, R&D Expenditure and Innovative Investment: Evidence from the UK's 1990 Workplace Industrial Relations Survey.” Industrial and Corporate Change 8: 211–234. doi: 10.1093/icc/8.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Michie, J., and M. Sheenan. 2005. “Business Strategy, Human Resources, Labour Market Flexibility and Competitive Advantage.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 16 (3): 445–464. doi: 10.1080/0958519042000339598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990. “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization.” American Economic Review 80 (3): 511–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1995. “Complementarities and Fit Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in Manufacturing.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 19: 179–208. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mookherjee, D. 2006. “Decentralization, Hierarchies, and Incentives: A Mechanism Design Perspective.” Journal of Economic Literature 44 (2): 367–390. doi: 10.1257/jel.44.2.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. J. 1999. “Executive Compensation.” In Chap. 38 in Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by O. Ashenfelter, and D. E. Card, Vol. 3b, 2485–2563. New York: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Shipton, H., D. Fay, M. West, M. Patterson, and K. Birdi. 2005. “Managing People to Promote Innovation.” Creativity and Innovation Management 14 (2): 118–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00332.x
   Google Scholar
• Shipton, H., M. West, J. Dawson, K. Birdi, and M. Patterson. 2006. “HRM as a Predictor of Innovation.” Human Resource Management Journal 16 (1): 3–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2006.00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Tampe, P., L. M. Hitt, and E. Brynjolfsson. 2012. “The Extroverted Firm: How External Information Practices Affect Innovation and Productivity.” Management Science 58 (5): 843–859. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinding, A. L. 2006. “Absorptive Capacity and Innovative Performance: A Human Capital Approach.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4–5): 507–517. doi: 10.1080/10438590500513057
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. M., G. C. McMahan, and A. McWilliams. 1994. “Human Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource Based Perspective.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 5 (2): 301–326. doi: 10.1080/09585199400000020
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., R. Dekker, and A. Kleinknecht. 2011. “Flexible Labor and Innovation Performance: Evidence from Longitudinal Firm-level data.” Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (3): 941–968. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtr013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoghi, C., R. D. Mohr, and P. B. Meyer. 2010. “Workplace Organization and Innovation.” Canadian Journal of Economics 43 (2): 622–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar