Mapping research on R&D, innovation and productivity: a study of an academic endeavour

References

• Arundel, A. 2008. “Innovation Surveys and Policy: Lessons from the CIS.” In Innovation policy in Europe: Measurement and Strategy, edited by C. Nauwelaers and R. Wintjes, 3–28. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelius, B., H. Landström, and O. Persson. 2006. “Entrepreneurial Studies: The Dynamic Research Front of a Developing Social Science.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practise 30 (3): 375–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairesse. 1998. “Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7 (2): 115–158. doi: 10.1080/10438599800000031
   Google Scholar
• Dachs, B., T. Roediger-Schluga, C. Widhalm, and A. Zartl. 2001. “Mapping Evolutionary Economics: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Paper presented at the EMAEE conference, Vienna, Austria, September 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. P., C. F. Pinto, and F. R. Serra. 2014. “The Transaction Costs Theory in International Business Research: A Bibliometric Study Over Three Decades.” Scientometrics 98 (3): 1899–1922. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1172-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth.” Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 92–116. doi: 10.2307/3003321
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1994. “Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint.” The American Economic Review 84 (1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H. 2011. Innovation, and Productivity. NBER Working Paper No. 17178. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., J. Mairesse, and P. Mohnen. 2010. “Measuring the Returns to R&D.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Vol. II, edited by B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, 1033–1082. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heijdra, B. J., and A. D. Lowenberg. 1986. “Duhem-Quine, Lakatos and Research Programmes in Economics.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 1 (3): 175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Jacso, P. 2005. “As We May Search – Comparison of Major Features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar Citation-Based and Citation-Enhanced Databases.” Current Science 89 (9): 1537–1547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 91–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lööf, H., J. Mairesse, and P. Mohnen. Forthcoming. Introduction: CDM 20 years after. Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mairesse, J., and M. Sassenou. 1991. R&D Productivity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level. NBER Working Paper No. 3666. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1980. “Basic Research and Productivity Increases in Manufacturing.” American Economic Review 70 (5): 863–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2012. “The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies.” Research Policy 41 (7): 1219–1239. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. 2001. “Nelson and Winter’s Evolutionary Theory – A Citation Analysis.” SPRU, University of Sussex, Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P., and B. H. Hall. 2013. “Innovation and Productivity: An Update.” Eurasian Business Review 3 (1): 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, M. J., and P. Murugesan. 1975. “Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations.” Social Studies of Science 5 (1): 86–92. doi: 10.1177/030631277500500106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. 1998. “Technologies, Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells Us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn’t.” Industrial and Corporate Change 7 (3): 433–452. doi: 10.1093/icc/7.3.433
   Google Scholar
• Peritz, B. C. 1983. “A Classification of Citation Roles for the Social Sciences and Related Fields.” Scientometrics 5 (5): 303–312. doi: 10.1007/BF02147226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafols, P. A., and A. Leydesdorff. 2010. “Science Overlay Maps: A New Tool for Research Policy and Library Management.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 61 (9): 1871–1887. doi: 10.1002/asi.21368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafique, M. 2013. “Thinking Inside the Box? Intellectual Structure of the Knowledge Base of Innovation Research.” Strategic Management Journal 34 (1): 62–93. doi: 10.1002/smj.2002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syverson, C. 2011. “What Determines Productivity?” Journal of Economic Literature 49 (2): 326–365. doi: 10.1257/jel.49.2.326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2011. “Text Mining and Visualization Using VOSviewer.” ISSI Newsletter 7: 50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, D. W. 2007. “Popper and Lakatos in Economic Methodology.” In The Philosophy of Economics, edited by D. Hausman, 188–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar