Impact of public support on the innovation probability in Chilean firms

References

• Acosta, M., D. Coronado, and C. Romero. 2015. “Linking Public Support, R&D, Innovation and Productivity: New Evidence from the Spanish Food Industry.” Food Policy 57: 50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afcha, S. 2012. “Analyzing the Interaction Between R&D Subsidies and Firm’s Innovation Strategy.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 7: 57–70. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242012000300006
   Google Scholar
• Agosin, M., N. Grau, and C. Larrain. 2010. “Industrial Policy in Chile”. No 4695, Research Department Publications, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, R., C. Bravo-Ortega, and L. Navarro. 2011. “Innovation, R&D Investment and Productivity in Chile.” Cepal Review 104: 135–160. doi: 10.18356/7ce1ee2d-en
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, R., C. Bravo-Ortega, and A. Zahler. 2015. “Innovation and Productivity in Services: Evidence from Chile.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 51 (3): 593–611. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1026696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvarez, R., G. Crespi, and C. Conrado. 2012. “Public Programs, Innovation, and Firm Performance in Chile.” 2 Inter-American Development Bank, N° IDB-TN-375, 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Antolín-López, R., J. Céspedes-Lorente, N. García-de-Frutos, J. Martínez-del-Río, and M. Pérez-Valls. 2015. “Fostering Product Innovation: Differences Between New Ventures and Established Firms.” Technovation 41-42: 25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. 2005. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd ed. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Benavente, J. 2005. “Investigación y desarrollo, innovación y productividad: un análisis econométrico a nivel de la firma.” Estudios de Economía 32: 39–67.
   Google Scholar
• Benavente, J., and G. Crespi. 2003. “The Impact of an Associative Strategy (the PROFO Program) on Small and Medium Enterprises in Chile”. University of Sussex, SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Benavente, J., G. Crespi, and A. Maffioli. 2007. “Public Support to Firm-Level Innovation: An Evaluation of the FONTEC Program.” OVE Working Papers OVE/WP-05/07. Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Berubé, C., and P. Mohnen. 2009. “Are Firms that Receive R&D Subsidies More Innovative?” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 42: 206–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo-Ortega, C., J. Benavente, and Á González. 2014. “Innovation, Exports, and Productivity: Learning and Self-Selection in Chile.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 50: 68–95. doi: 10.2753/REE1540-496X5001S105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, A., A. Raknerud, and M. Rybalka. 2012. “The Effects of R&D Tax Credits on Patenting and Innovations.” Research Policy 41: 334–345. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairessec. 1998. “Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7 (2): 115–158. doi: 10.1080/10438599800000031
   Google Scholar
• Crespi, G., A. Maffioli, and M. Melendez. 2011. “Public Support to Innovation: The Colombian COLCIENCIAS’ Experience.” Inter-American Development Bank N° IDB-TN-264: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, X., and L. Cheng. 2015. “The Effect of Public Subsidies on Corporate R&D Investment: An Application of the Generalized Propensity Score.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90: 410–419. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. 1985. “Panel Data from Time Series of Cross-Sections.” Journal of Econometrics 30: 109–126. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(85)90134-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldes, C., C. Felzensztein, and J. Palacios. 2017. “Technological and Non-technological Innovations, Performance and Propensity to Innovate across Industries: The Case of an Emerging Economy.” Industrial Marketing Management 61: 55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, M., and E. Palladini. 2008. “Chile: A Strategy to Promote Innovative Small and Medium Enterprises.” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 4518.
   Google Scholar
• González, X., and C. Pazó. 2008. “Do Public Subsidies Stimulate Private R&D Spending?” Research Policy 37: 371–389. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, J., and R. Yam. 2015. “Effects of Government Financial Incentives on Firms’ Innovation Performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s.” Research Policy 44: 273–282. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, D., Y. Guo, and K. Jiang. 2016. “Government-Subsidized R&D and Firm Innovation: Evidence from China.” Research Policy 45 (6): 1129–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B., and A. Maffioli. 2008. “Evaluating the Impact of Technology Development Funds in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Latin.” NBER Working Paper N° 13835.
   Google Scholar
• Huergo, E., M. Trenado, and A. Ubierna. 2015. “The Impact of Public Support on Firm Propensity to Engage in R&D: Spanish Experience.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change. In Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M., and E. Woolley. 2014. “Estimating the Effect of UK Direct Public Support for Innovation.” Bis Analysis Paper Number 04. Department for Business Innovation & Skills: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2011. “The Differential Effects of Public R&D Support on Firms R&D: Theory and Evidence from Multi-Country Data.” Technovation 31: 256–269. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, R. 1993. “Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Models with a Time Series of Repeated Cross-Sections.” Journal of Econometrics 59: 99–123. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(93)90041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. “Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities.” OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. “OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy Chile”.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, J., and M. Yogo. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: A Festschrift in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, edited by Donald W. K. Andrews and James H. Stock, 80–108. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, H. 2009. Evaluating SME Support Programs in Chile Using Panel Firm Data. Policy Research. The World Bank Working Papers N° 5082. 1: 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, M., and T. Nijman. 1992. “Can Cohort Data Be Treated As Genuine Panel Data?” Empirical Economics 17 (1): 9–23. doi: 10.1007/BF01192471
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2008. Chile: Toward a Cohesive and Well Governed National Innovation System. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Young, E., and B. Cheol. 2010. “The Effect of Risk-Sharing Government Subsidy on Corporate R&D Investment: Empirical Evidence from Korea.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77: 881–890. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar