As times goes by. A dynamic impact assessment of the innovation policy and the Matthew effect on Argentinean firms

References

• Aboal, Diego, and Paula Garda. 2015. “¿La Financiación Pública Estimula La Innovación y La Productividad? Una Evaluación de Impacto.” Revista de La CEPAL 115 (Abril): 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Aguer, A., V. Moori Koenig, and M. Carugati. 2015. “Análisis de Las Nuevas Empresas Adjudicatarias Del FONTAR Durante El Periodo 2008-2012.” MINCyT.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, Joshua David, and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics : An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C. 1997. “The Economics of Path-Dependence in Industrial Organization.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 15 (6): 643–675. doi:10.1016/s0167-7187(97)00006-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C., and F. Crespi. 2013. “The ‘Matthew Effect’ in R&D Public Subsidies: The Italian Evidence.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (8): 1523–1534. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, B. 2009. “Who Gets the Money? The Dynamics of R&D Project Subsidies in Germany.” Zew Discussion Paper No. 08-018.
   Google Scholar
• Boeing, P. 2016. “The Allocation and Effectiveness of China’s R&D Subsidies - Evidence From Listed Firms.” Research Policy 45 (9): 1774–1789. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, G., G. Dosi, N. Jacoby, A. Secchi, and F. Tamagni. 2010. “Corporate Performances and Market Selection: Some Comparative Evidence.” Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (6): 1953. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busom, Isabel, Beatriz Corchuelo, and Ester Martínez-Ros. 2017. “Participation Inertia in R&D Tax Incentive and Subsidy Programs.” Small Business Economics 48 (1): 153–177. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9770-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Ådne, Arvid Raknerud, and Marina Rybalka. 2012. “The Effects of R&D Tax Credits on Patenting and Innovations.” Research Policy 41 (2): 334–345. doi:10.1016/J.RESPOL.2011.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, Victoria, Alessandro Maffioli, Sofía Rojo, and Rodolfo Stucchi. 2014. “Knowledge Spillovers of Innovation Policy through Labor Mobility : An Impact Evaluation of the FONTAR Program in Argentina.” IDB-WP-488. IDB Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Cheol Cin, Beom, Jun Kim Young, and Nicholas S. Vonortas. 2017. “The Impact of Public R&D Subsidy on Small Firm Productivity: Evidence From Korean SMEs.” Small Business Economics 48: 345–360. doi: 10.1007/s11187-016-9786-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespi, F., and C. Antonelli. 2012. “Matthew Effects and R&D Subsidies: Knowledge Cumulability in High-Tech and Low-Tech Industries.” Giornale Degli Economisti e Annali Di Economia 71(1): 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Crespi, Gustavo, Lucas Figal Garone, Alessandro Maffioli, and Marcela Melendez. 2015. “Long-Term Productivity Effects of Public Support to Innovation in Colombia.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 51 (1): 48–64. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2015.998080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, Dirk, and Julie Delanote. 2017. “Incorporating Innovation Subsidies in the CDM Framework: Empirical Evidence From Belgium.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 26 (1–2): 78–92. doi:10.1080/10438599.2016.1202514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, Paul A., Bronwyn H. Hall, and Andrew A. Toole. 2000. “Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence.” Research Policy 29 (4–5): 497–529. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimos, Christos, and Geoff Pugh. 2016. “The Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies: A Meta-Regression Analysis of the Evaluation Literature.” Research Policy 45 (4): 797–815. doi:10.1016/J.RESPOL.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguet, E. 2003. Are R&D Subsidies a Substitute or a Complement to Privately Funded R&D? Evidence from France Using Propensity Score Methods for Non-Experimental Data.” Cahiers de La MSE – EUREQua 2003(75).
   Google Scholar
• Garone, L. F., F. Bernini, V. Castillo, and A. Maffioli. 2017. “Supporting SMEs to Export: The Importance of the Dynamics and Sequence of the Effects.” Lacer.Lacea.Org.
   Google Scholar
• González, X., and C. Pazó. 2008. “Do Public Subsidies Stimulate Private R&D Spending?” Research Policy 37 (3): 371–389. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Bronwyn H., and Alessandro Maffioli. 2008. “Evaluating the Impact of Technology Development Funds in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Latin-America.” Inter-American Development Bank Office of Evaluation and Oversight Working Paper: OVE/WP-01/08 January.
   Google Scholar
• Huergo, E., and M. Trenado. 2008. “Determinantes de La Solicitud y Concesión de Créditos Blandos. La Empresa Española y El Apoyo Del CDTI Para La I + D+I.” Documento de Trabajo Nro 6. Centro Para El Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, Kosuke, and In Song Kim. 2016. “When Should We Use Linear Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data?” Princeton University, August 19.
   Google Scholar
• Innova, CORFO. n.d. Resultados Evaluación de Programas Gubernamentales (EPG) DIPRES 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jaumotte, F., and N. Pain. 2005. “An Overview of Public Policies to Support Innovation.” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 456, OECD Publishing Paris. doi:10.1787/707375561288.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., B. Johnson, E. Lorenz, and BÅ Lundvall. 2007. “Forms of Knowledge and Modes of Innovation.” Research Policy 36 (5): 680–693. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten, Renate, Job Harms, Kellie Liket, and Karen Maas. 2017. “Small Firms, Large Impact? A Systematic Review of the SME Finance Literature.” World Development 97: 330–348. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, Trinh, and Adam B. Jaffe. 2017. “The Impact of R&D Subsidy on Innovation: Evidence From New Zealand Firms.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 26 (5): 429–452. doi:10.1080/10438599.2016.1213504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, Albert N, and John T Scott. 2012. “Employment Growth From Public Support of Innovation in Small Firms.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 21 (7): 655–678. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2011.638190
   Google Scholar
• Lööf, Hans, and Almas Heshmati. 2005. “The Impact of Public Funding on Private R&D Investment: New Evidence from a Firm Level Innovation Study.” Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation. Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, no. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Acevedo, Gladys, and Hong W. Tan. 2010. Evaluacion de Impacto de Los Programas Para PyME Latinoamerica y El Caribe. Washington, DC: Banco Inte.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, Franco, Luigi Orsenigo, and Pietro Peretto. 1997. “Persistence of Innovative Activities, Sectoral Patterns of Innovation and International Technological Specialization.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 15 (6): 801–826. doi:10.1016/s0167-7187(97)00012-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MINCyT. 2013. Análisis de Las Empresas Beneficiadas Con Apoyos Reiterados Del FONTAR. Buenos Aires: Ministerio Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. 1991. “Why Do Firms Differ, and How Does It Matter?” Strategic Management Journal 12 (S2): 61–74: doi:10.1002/smj.4250121006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Stephen, Noémi Kreif, Richard Grieve, Matthew Sutton, and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2016. “Estimating Causal Effects: Considering Three Alternatives to Difference-in-Differences Estimation.” Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 16 (1–2): 1–21. doi:10.1007/s10742-016-0146-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirano, F. 2011. “El FONTAR y La Promoción de La Innovación En Empresas Entre 2006 y 2010.” In Investigación Científica e Innovación Tecnológica En Argentina. Impacto Fondos de Promoción, edited by F. Porta and G. Lugones, 81–132. Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M., and D. Suárez. 2017. “Matthew Effect, Capabilities and Innovation Policy: The Argentinean Case.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 27 (1): 62–79. doi:10.1080/10438599.2017.1294544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, Mariano, Diana Suárez, Timoteo Turrin, and Gabriel Yoguel. 2015. “Innovación, Capacidades y Política Pública. Análisis de Firmas Recurrentes En El Fondo Tecnológico Argentino, 1992-2013.” 7. Documento de Trabajo. Buenos Aires, CIECTI Publicaciones.
   Google Scholar
• Piekkola, H. 2007. “Public Funding of R&D and Growth: Firm-Level Evidence From Finland.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16 (3): 195–210. doi:10.1080/10438590600661897.
   Google Scholar
• Porta, F., and G. Lugones. 2011. Investigación Científica e Innovación Tecnológica En Argentina. Impacto de Los Fondos de La Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
   Google Scholar
• Radicic, D., G. Pugh, H. Hollanders, R. Wintjes, F. Crespi, and C. Antonelli. 2014. The Impact of Innovation Support Programmes on SME Innovation in Traditional Manufacturing Industries: An Evaluation for Seven EU Regions.” UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series #2014-033.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, V., and G. Yoguel. 2015. “The Ontology of Complexity and the Neoschunpeterean Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.” In The Economics of Knowledge, Innovation and Systemic Technology Policy, edited by F. Crespi and F. Quatraro, 203–238. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, James M, Miguel Angel Hernan, and Babette Brumback. 2000. “Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology.” LWW.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, Brent R., Link Albert N., Temple Dorota S., and Rogozhin Alex V. 2008. Economic Analysis of NIST’s Investments in Superfilling Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ruegg, Rosalie, and Gretchen B Jordan. 2007. “Overview of Evaluation Methods for R&D Programs. A Directory of Evaluation Methods Relevant to Technology Development Programs.” Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States).
   Google Scholar
• Ruegg, Rosalie, Alan C O’Connor, and Ross J Loomis. 2014. Evaluating Realized Impacts of DOE/EERE R&D Programs. Standard Impact Evaluation Method. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.(LBNL).
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, D. 2014. “Persistence of Innovation in Unstable Environments: Continuity and Change in the Firm’s Innovative Behavior.” Research Policy 43 (4): 726–736. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez, D. 2015. “Innovative Strategies: When Path Dependence Turns into Path Creation. Innovation and Performance in the Argentinean Manufacturing Sector.” Globelics Working Paper Series No. 2015-04, ISBN: 978-87-92923-09-7, http://Www.Globelics.Org/Wp-Content/Uploads/2015/08/GWP-2015-04.Pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tanayama, T. 2007. “Eligibility, Awareness and the Application Decision: An Empirical Study of Firm Participation in an R&D Subsidy Program.” HECER Discussion Paper No. 161.
   Google Scholar
• Tassey, Gregory. 2003. “Methods for Assessing the Economic Impacts of Government R&D.” NATIONAL INST OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY GAITHERSBURG MD.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D., and M. Augier. 2007. “Competencies, Capabilities and the Neo-Schumpeterian Tradition.” In Elgar Companion To Neo-Schumpeterian Economics, edited by H. Hanusch and A. Pyka, 267–286. Berkeley: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zúñiga-Vicente, JÁ, C. Alonso-Borrego, F. J. Forcadell, and José I Galán. 2014. “Assessing the Effect of Public Subsidies on Firm R&D Investment: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Surveys 28 (1): 36–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00738.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar