Innovative growth: the role of market power and negative selection

References

• Aghion, Philippe, Ufuk Akcigit, and Peter Howitt. 2014. “What do we Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?” In Handbook of Economic Growth, 515–563. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, Cristiano, and Giuseppe Scellato. 2011. “Out-of-equilibrium Profit and Innovation.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20 (5): 405–421.
   Google Scholar
• Anzoategui, Diego, Diego Comin, Mark Gertler, and Joseba Martinez. 2016. Endogenous Technology Adoption and R&D as Sources of Business Cycle Persistence. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Barro, Robert J. 2015. “Convergence and Modernization.” Economic Journal 125 (585): 911–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelsman, Eric, George van Leeuwen, and Michael Polder. 2017. “CDM Using a Cross-Country Micro Moments Database.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 26 (1–2): 168–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, Nicholas, and John Van Reenen. 2010. “Why do Management Practices Differ Across Firms and Countries?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (1): 203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, Richard, Rachel Griffith, and John Van Reenen. 1999. “Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms.” The Review of Economic Studies 66 (3): 529–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Wesley M, and Daniel A Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: the two Faces of R & D.” The Economic Journal 99 (397): 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado, Carol, Jonathan Haskel, Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, and Massimiliano Iommi. 2014. “Intangibles and industry productivity growth: Evidence from the EU.” Manuscript available at www.intan-invest.net.
   Google Scholar
• Corrado, Carol, Jonathan Haskel, Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, and Massiamo Iommi. 2016. Intangible investment in the EU and US before and since the Great Recession and its contribution to productivity growth. EIB Working Papers No. 2016/08.
   Google Scholar
• Crepon, Bruno, Emmanuel Duguet, and Jacques Mairessec. 1998. “Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7 (2): 115–158. doi:10.1080/10438599800000031.
   Google Scholar
• Duguet, Emmanuel. 2006. “Innovation Height, Spillovers and TFP Growth at the Firm Level: Evidence From French Manufacturing.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4–5): 415–442.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, Theodore, Stefan Sundgren, and Martin T. Wells. 1998. “Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics 48 (1): 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görzig, Bernd, Hannu Piekkola, and Rebecca Riley. 2010. Production of Own Account Intangible Investment: Methodology in Innodrive Project, Innodrive Working Paper No 1.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, Rachel, Elena Huergo, Jacques Mairesse, and Bettina Peters. 2006. “Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (4): 483–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, Rachel, Stephen Redding, and Jon Van Reenen. 2004. “Mapping the two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (4): 883–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Bronwyn H., Francesca Lotti, and Jacques Mairesse. 2009. “Innovation and Productivity in SMEs: Empirical Evidence for Italy.” Small Business Economics 33 (1): 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Bronwyn H., Francesca Lotti, and Jacques Mairesse. 2013. “Evidence on the Impact of R&D and ICT Investments on Innovation and Productivity in Italian Firms.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 22 (3): 300–328.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Bronwyn H., and Jacquess Mairesse. 1995. “Exploring the Relationship Between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms.” Journal of Econometrics 65 (1): 263–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Bronwyn H., Jacques Mairesse, and Pierre Mohnen. 2010. “Measuring the Returns to R&D.” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 2: 1033–1082.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Bronwyn H., and Vania Sena. 2017. “Appropriability Mechanisms, Innovation, and Productivity: Evidence From the UK.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 26 (1–2): 42–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Bronwyn H., and Katrin Vopel. 1996. “Innovation, Market Share, and Market Value.” In Strasbourg, France: Prepared for the International Conference on the Economics and Econometrics of Innovation, The European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Hanel, Petr. 2008. “The use of Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation by Manufacturing Firms in Canada.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 17 (4): 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Rupert, Jordi Jaumandreu, Jacques Mairesse, and Bettina Peters. 2014. “Does Innovation Stimulate Employment? A Firm-Level Analysis Using Comparable Micro-Data From Four European Countries.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 35: 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E. 2006. “Trade, FDI, and the Organization of Firms.” Journal of Economic Literature 44 (3): 589–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaumandreu, Jordi, and Jacques Mairesse. 2017. “Disentangling the Effects of Process and Product Helpman (2006)Innovation on Cost and Demand.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 26 (1–2): 150–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, Wolfgang, and Stephen R. Yeaple. 2009. “Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-Level Evidence from the United States.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (4): 821–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lileeva, Alla, and Daniel Trefler. 2010. “Improved Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-Level Productivity … For Some Plants.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (3): 1051–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lööf, Hans, and Almas Heshmati. 2002. “Knowledge Capital and Performance Heterogeneity:: A Firm-Level Innovation Study.” International Journal of Production Economics 76 (1): 61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lööf, Hans, and Almas Heshmati. 2006. “On the Relationship Between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4–5): 317–344.
   Google Scholar
• Mairesse, Jacques, and Pierre Mohnen. 2004. “The Importance of R&D for Innovation: a Reassessment Using French Survey Data.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (1–2): 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Mairesse, Jacques, and Pierre Mohnen. 2010. “Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis.” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 2: 1129–1155.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E., M. Schwartz, and S. Wagner. 1981. “Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study.” Economic Journal 91 (364): 907–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musolesi, Antonio, and Jean-Pierre Huiban. 2010. “Innovation and Productivity in Knowledge Intensive Business Services.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 34 (1): 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi, Maria Laura, Fabio Schiantarelli, and Alessandro Sembenelli. 2006. “Productivity, Innovation and R&D: Micro Evidence for Italy.” European Economic Review 50 (8): 2037–2061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekkola, Hannu. 2007. “Public Funding of R&D and Growth: Firm-Level Evidence From Finland.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16 (3): 195–210.
   Google Scholar
• Piekkola, Hannu. 2016. “Intangible Investment and Market Valuation.” Review of Income and Wealth 62 (1): 28–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekkola, Hannu. 2018. “Broad-based Intangibles as Generators of Growth in Europe.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 27 (4): 377–400. doi:10.1080/10438599.2017.1376170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekkola, Hannu, Mikko Lintamo, Rebecca Riley, Catherine Robinson, Kurt Geppert, Bernd Görzig, Anne Neumann, et al. 2011. “Firm-level intangible capital in six countries: Finland, Norway, the UK, Germany, the Czech Republic, Slovenia.” In Intangible Capital - Driver of Growth in Europe, edited by Hannu Piekkola, 63–95. Proceedings of the University of Vaasa No. 167. Vaasa.
   Google Scholar
• Schankerman, Mark. 1981. “The Effects of Double-Counting and Expensing on the Measured Returns to R&D.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (3): 454–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1947. “The Creative Response in Economic History.” The Journal of Economic History 7 (2): 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squicciarini, Mariagrazia, and Marie Le Mouel. 2012. Defining and Measuring Investment in Organisational Capital Using US Microdata to Develop a Task-based Approach. In OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ark, Bart. 2016. “The Productivity Paradox of the new Digital Economy.” International Productivity Monitor 31: 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ark, Bart, Janet X Hao, Carol Corrado, and Charles Hulten. 2009. “Measuring Intangible Capital and its Contribution to Economic Growth in Europe.” EIB Papers 14 (1): 62–93.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, George, and Luuk Klomp. 2006. “On the Contribution of Innovation to Multi-Factor Productivity Growth.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4–5): 367–390.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, George, and Pierre Mohnen. 2017. “Revisiting the Porter Hypothesis: an Empirical Analysis of Green Innovation for the Netherlands.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 26 (1–2): 63–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, Natarjan, and Vasudevan Ramanujam. 1986. “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 11 (4): 801–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Second edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar