Complementarities in the sourcing, use and exploitation of managerial and technological innovations

References

• Añón Higón, D., J. Gómez, and P. Vargas. 2017. “Complementarities in Innovation Strategy: Do Intangibles Play a Role in Enhancing Firm Performance?” Industrial and Corporate Change 26 (5): 865–886. doi:10.1093/icc/dtw055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., and A. Gambardella. 1990. “Complementarity and External Linkages: The Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechnology.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 38 (4): 361–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astebro, T. 1995. “The Effect of Management and Social Interaction on the Intra-firm Diffusion of Electronic Mail Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 42 (4): 319–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, T. S., H. W. Lightfoot, and J. M. Kay. 2009. “Servitized Manufacture: Practical Challenges of Delivering Integrated Products and Services.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 223 (9): 1207–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartel, A., and F. R. Lichtenberg. 1987. “The Comparative Advantage of Educated Workers in Implementing New Technology.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 69: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoloni, E., and M. Baussola. 2015. Persistent Product Innovation and Market-Oriented Behaviour: the Impact on Firms’ Performance. DISCE – Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1505, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE), Milan.
   Google Scholar
• Bartz-Zuccala, W., P. Mohnen, and H. Schweiger. 2018. “The Role of Innovation and Management Practices in Determining Firm Productivity.” Comparative Economic Studies 60: 502–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battisti, G., Y K. Dwivedi, A.T.H. Kuah, & C R. Lages, (2013). Service Measurement and Definitions: Challenges and Limitations Chapter 2. In Managing Services: Challenges and Innovations, edited by Haynes K. and Grugulis I. , 7–20. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti, G., and A. Iona. 2009. “The Intra-firm Diffusion of Complementary Innovations: Evidence from the Adoption of Management Practices by British Establishments.” Research Policy 38: 1326–1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battisti, G., and P. Stoneman. 2010. “How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies Between Technological and Organizational Innovations.” British Journal of Management 21: 187–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battisti, G., and P. Stoneman. 2019. ‘Measuring the Innovativeness of Firms May, 2019 (With Giuliana Battisti) and at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Boston, August 2019, published in Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings 2019(1):15184, DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2019.15184 and as ESCOE Discussion paper No 19/2019, London November 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S. E., and L. Lynch. 2004. “What’s Driving the New Economy?: The Benefits of Workplace Innovation.” The Economic Journal 114: F97–F116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., E. Brynjolfsson, L. Foster, R. Jarmin, I. Saporta-Eksten, and J. Van Reenen. 2013. ‘Management in America’, US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-13-01, January 15, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., and J. Van Reenen. 2007. “Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (4): 1351–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., and J. Van Reenen. 2010. “Why Do Management Practices Differ Across Firms and Countries?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (1): 203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T. F., E. Brynolfsson, and L. M. Hitt. 2002. “Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-level Evidence.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 339–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., L. M. Hitt, and S. Yang. 2002. “Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2002: 137–181.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and A. Saunders. 2009. Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology is Reshaping the Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cainarca, G., M. G. Colombo, and S. Mariotti. 1990. “Firm Size and the Adoption of Flexible Automation.” Small Business Economics 2: 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Caroli, E., and J. Van Reenen. 2001. “Skill-biased Organizational Change? Evidence from A Panel of British and French Establishments.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 1449–1492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., E. Golovko, and E. Martínez-Ros. 2010. “Innovation, Exports and Productivity.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 28: 372–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2006. “In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition.” Management Science 52 (1): 68–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cefis, E., and L. Orsenigo. 2001. “The Persistence of Innovative Activities: A Cross-countries and Cross-sectors Comparative Analysis.” Research Policy 30: 1139–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D.” The Economic Journal 99: 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. 2010. “An Integration of Research Findings of Effects of Firm Size and Market Competition on Product and Process Innovations.” British Journal of Management 21 (4): 996–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, T. 1994. “Plant Age and Technology use in U.S. Manufacturing Industries.” The RAND Journal of Economics 25 (3): 488–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzen, D. 2003. “The Causality Between R&D and Productivity in Manufacturing: An International Disaggregate Panel Data Study.” International Review of Applied Economics 17 (2): 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Frenz, M., and R. Lambert. 2008a. Innovation Modes and Productivity in the UK, Report to the Science, Innovation and Analysis Unit, UK Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (Now Business, Industry and Skills department) Research Report 08, 12, 1-27.
   Google Scholar
• Frenz, M., and R. Lambert. 2008b. “Technological and Non-technological Innovation.” Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, 235–238.
   Google Scholar
• Frenz, M., and R. Lambert. 2009. “Exploring Non-technological and Mixed Modes of Innovation Across Countries, Ch. 2.” In Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic Perspective, 69–110. Paris: OECD publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gallouj, F., and O. Weinstein. 1997. “Innovation in Services.” Research Policy 26: 537–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. 1990. “Innovation, Technological Opportunity, and Market Structure.” Oxford Economic Papers 42: 586–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. A., and S. Machin. 1992. “Do Innovating Firms Outperform Non-innovators?” Business Strategy Review 3 (2): 79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. A., and S. Toker. 1996. “The Turnover of Market Leaders in UK Manufacturing Industry, 1979-86.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 14: 141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., and H. Harmgart. 2005. “Retail Productivity.” International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 15: 281–290.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., R. Harrison, J. Haskel, and M. Sako. 2003. The UK Productivity gap and the Importance of the Service Sectors. London: Advanced Institute of Management (AIM).
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., S. Redding, and H. Simpson. 2004. Foreign Ownership and Productivity: New Evidence from the Service Sector and the R&D Lab. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H. 2000. “Innovation and Market Value.” In Productivity, Innovation, and Economic Performance, edited by R. Barrell, G. Mason, and M. O’Mahoney, 177–179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., F. Lotti, and J. Mairesse. 2009. “Innovation and Productivity in SMEs: Empirical Evidence for Italy.” Small Business Economics 33 (1): 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., and R. Oriani. 2006. “Does the Market Value R&D Investment by European Firms? Evidence from a Panel of Manufacturing Firms in France, Germany, and Italy.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 24 (5): 971–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, T. H., and J. M. McDowell. 1984. “The Determinants of Technology Adoption: The Case of the Banking Firm.” The RAND Journal of Economics 15: 328–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. 1996. “Openness and Growth: A Time-series, Cross-country Analysis for Developing Countries.” Journal of Development Economics 48: 419–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskel, J., and A. Pesole. 2009. Productivity and Innovation in UK Financial Services: An Intangible Assets Approach, Imperial College Discussion Paper 2011/02.
   Google Scholar
• Haskel, J., and S. Westlake. 2017. Capitalism Without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huselid, M. 1995. “The Impact of Human Resources Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 38: 635–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichniowski, C., K. Shaw, and G. Prennushi. 1997. “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines.” American Economic Review 87: 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrgidou, L. P., and S. Spyropoulou. 2013. “Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Innovativeness: An Empirical Study.” British Journal of Management 24 (3): 281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A., and C. E. Helfat. 2010. “Innovation Objectives, Knowledge Sources, and the Benefits of Breadth.” Strategic Management Journal 31 (2): 224–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little J. S. & R. K. Triest (1996), “Technology Diffusion in U.S. Manufacturing: The Geographic Dimension.” In Technology and Growth: Conference Proceedings. Vol. 40, edited by Fuhrer J. C. and J. S. Little, 215–268. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Lööf, H., and A. Heshmati. 2004. Sources of Finance, R&D Investment and Productivity: Correlation or Causality? CESIS Working Paper 2004:11, 25 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Love, J. H., and S. Roper. 2009. “Organizing Innovation: Complementarities Between Cross-functional Teams.” Technovation 29 (3): 192–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1968. Industrial Research and Technological Innovation. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990. “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organisation.” American Economic Review 80: 511–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miravete, E. J., and J. C. Pernias. 2006. “Innovation Complementarity and Scale of Production.” Journal of Industrial Economics 54 (1): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, M. J., and J. Birkinshaw. 2009. “The Sources of Management Innovation: When Firms Introduce new Management Practices.” Journal of Business Research 62: 1269–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., M. Wright, and M. Feldman. 2019. “The Digital Transformation of Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Progress, Challenges and Key Themes.” Research Policy 48 (8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A. 2008. “Exploring the Financial Consequences of the Servitization of Manufacturing.” Operations Management Research 1 (2): 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A. 2009. “The Servitisation of Manufacturing: An Analysis of Global Trends.” Operations Management Research 2: 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Nemlioglu, I., and S. K. Mallick. 2017. “Do Managerial Practices Matter in Innovation and Firm Performance Relations? New Evidence from the UK.” European Financial Management 23 (5): 1016–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noteboom, B. 1993. “Adoption, Firm Size and Risk of Implementation.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2: 203–216.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. 3rd ed. Paris: Eurostat Commission.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018a. Conference summary: Implications of the digital transformation for the business sector, London, United Kingdom, 8-9 November.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/Eurostat. (2018), Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th ed., The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing/Eurostat, Paris/Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, M., and W. de Boer. 2002. “Britain’s Relative Productivity Performance: Has Anything Changed?” National Institute Economic Review, 179, 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pedro Torres, P., and M. Augusto. 2019. “Understanding Complementarities among Different Forms of Innovation.” European Journal of Innovation Management, 23 (5), 813–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, R., and C. R. Bondibene. 2018. ‘Winners and Losers in the Knowledge Economy: The Role of Intangible Capital’ Paper prepared for the 35th IARIW General Conference, Denmark, August 20–25, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, S., J. Du, and J. H. Love. 2008. “Modelling the Innovation Value Chain.” Research Policy 37 (6-7): 961–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, S., C. Hales, J. R. Bryson, and J. Love. 2009. Measuring Sectoral Innovation Capability in Nine Areas of the UK Economy. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Rouvinen, P. 2002. “R&D-Productivity Dynamics: Causality, Lags and Dry Holes.” Journal of Applied Economics 5 (1): 123–156.
   Google Scholar
• Ruigrok, W., A. Pettigrew, S. Peck, and R. Whittington. 1999. “Corporate Restructuring and New Forms of Organizing: Evidence from Europe.” Management International Review 199 (2): 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sadun, Raffaella, and John Van Reenen. 2005. Information Technology and Productivity: It Ain't What You do It's the Way That You Do It. EDS Innovation Research Programme. Discussion paper n.2.
   Google Scholar
• Stoneman, P. 2010. Soft Innovation: Economics, Product Aesthetics and the Creative Industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoneman, P., and M. J. Kwon. 1996. “Technology Adoption and Firm Profitability.” The Economic Journal 106: 952–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S., and C. Hipp. 2002. “Knowledge Intensive, Technical and Other Services: Patterns of Competitiveness and Innovation Compared.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14 (2): 163–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Biesebroeck, J. 2007. “Complementarities in Automobile Production.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 1315–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandermerwe, S., and J. Rada. 1988. “Servitization of Business: Adding Value by Adding Services.” European Management Journal 6 (4): 314–324.
   Google Scholar
• Vives, X. 2008. “Innovation and Competitive Pressure.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 56 (3): 419–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakelin, K. 1998. “Innovation and Export Behaviour at the Firm Level.” Research Policy 26: 829–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, R., A. Pettigrew, S. Peck, E. Fenton, and M. Conyon. 1999. “Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study, 1992–1996.” Organization Science 10: 583–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar