How localised are knowledge spillovers? Evidence from microgeographic data on UK patent citations

References

• Adams, J. D., and A. B. Jaffe. 1996. “Bounding the Effects of R&D: An Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data.” RAND Journal of Economics 27 (4): 700–721. doi:10.2307/2555878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcácer, J., and M. Gittelman. 2006. “Patent Citations As a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4): 774–779. doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcácer, J., M. Gittelman, and B. Sampat. 2009. “Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis.” Research Policy 38 (2): 415–427. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldieri, L. 2011. “Technological and Geographical Proximity Effects on Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence From the US Patent Citations.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20 (6): 597–607. doi:10.1080/10438599.2011.554632.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., and B. Kogut. 1999. “Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks.” Management Science 45 (7): 905–917. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., S. Belenzon, and H. Lee. 2018. “Reversed Citations and the Localization of Knowledge Spillovers.” Journal of Economic Geography 18 (3): 495–521. doi:10.1093/jeg/lby015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autant-Bernard, C., M. Fadairo, and N. Massard. 2013. “Knowledge Diffusion and Innovation Policies Within the European Regions: Challenges Based on Recent Empirical Evidence.” Research Policy 42 (1): 196–210. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autant-Bernard, C., and J. P. LeSage. 2011. “Quantifying Knowledge Spillovers Using Spatial Econometric Models.” Journal of Regional Science 51 (3): 471–496. doi:10.1111/jors.2011.51.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenzon, S., and M. Schankerman. 2013. “Spreading the Word: Geography, Policy, and Knowledge Spillovers.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (3): 884–903. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi, L., and G. Peri. 2003. “Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence From European Patent Data.” European Economic Review 47 (4): 687–710. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2004. Knowledge Networks from Patent Data: Methodological Issues and Research Targets. Working Paper WP150, CESPRI, Milan. ftp://ftp.unibocconi.it/pub/RePEc/cri/papers/WP150BreschiLissoni.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2005. “Cross-Firm Inventors and Social Networks: Localized Knowledge Spillovers Revisited.” Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 79/80: 189–209. doi:10.2307/20777575.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2009. “Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks.” Journal of Economic Geography 9 (4): 439–468. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzard, K., G. A. Carlino, R. M. Hunt, J. K. Carr, and T. E. Smith. 2017. “The Agglomeration of American R&D Labs.” Journal of Urban Economics 101: 14–26. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2017.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzard, K., G. A. Carlino, R. M. Hunt, J. K. Carr, and T. E. Smith. 2020. “Localized Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence From the Spatial Clustering of R&D Labs and Patent Citations.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 81: 103490. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaert, J., M. du Plessis, J. Grouwels, C. Lecocq, T. Magerman, B. Peeters, X. Song, B. Van Looy, and C. Vereyen. 2011. Patent Statistics at Eurostat: Methods for Regionalisation, Sector Allocation and Name Harmonisation. Technical Report, Eurostat Methodologies and Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Carlino, G., and W. R. Kerr. 2015. “Agglomeration and Innovation.” In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edited by G. Duranton, J. V. Henderson, and W. C. Strange, 405–465. Vol. 5. North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo, P. 2004. “Managing Knowledge: Lessons From the Oil and Gas Sector.” Construction Management and Economics 22 (6): 631–642. doi:10.1080/0144619042000226289.
   Google Scholar
• Combes, P.-P., and H. G. Overman. 2004. “The Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities in the European Union.” In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edited by J. V. Henderson, and J.-F. Thisse, 2845–2909. Vol. 4. North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., P. David, and D. Foray. 2000. “The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness.” Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (2): 211–253. doi:10.1093/icc/9.2.211.
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., A. Rodriguez-Pose, and M. Storper. 2007. “The Territorial Dynamics of Innovation: a Europe – United States Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Economic Geography 7: 673–709. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P., and B. Verspagen. 2008. “Does it Matter Where Patent Citations Come From? Inventor vs. Examiner Citations in European Patents.” Research Policy 37 (10): 1892–1908. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daltrey, J., and G. Jones. 2019. “UK IPO Applicant Identifiers.” Presentation to the WIPO Applicant Name Standardization Workshop, Geneva 3rd May 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. 2017. Industrial Strategy: Building a Britain Fit for the Future. White Paper Cm 9528, HMSO, London. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/industrial-strategy-building-a-britain-fit-for-the-future.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. Various years. Transport Statistics GB. HMSO/TSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, T., and J. Schnellenbach. 2006. “What Do We Know About Geographical Knowledge Spillovers and Regional Growth? A Survey of the Literature.” Regional Studies 40 (3): 375–395. doi:10.1080/00343400600632739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguet, E., and M. MacGarvie. 2005. “How Well Do Patent Citations Measure Flows of Technology? Evidence From French Innovation Surveys.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14 (5): 375–393. doi:10.1080/1043859042000307347.
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and H. G. Overman. 2005. “Testing for Localization Using Micro-Geographic Data.” The Review of Economic Studies 72 (4): 1077–1106. doi:10.1111/0034-6527.00362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and D. Puga. 2004. “Micro-Foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies.” In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edited by J. V. Henderson, and J.-F. Thisse, 2063–2117. Vol. 4. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. Smart Guide to Cluster Policy. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P. 1999. “The New Economics of Innovation, Spillovers and Agglomeration: A Review of Empirical Studies.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8 (1-2): 5–25. doi:10.1080/10438599900000002.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, O., P. Guimarães, and D. Woodward. 2015. “Industry Localization, Distance Decay, and Knowledge Spillovers: Following the Patent Paper Trail.” Journal of Urban Economics 89: 21–31. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2015.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguli, I., J. Lin, and N. Reynolds. 2020. “The Paper Trail of Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence From Patent Interferences.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12 (2): 278–302. doi:10.1257/app.20180017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gann, D. M., and A. J. Salter. 2000. “Innovation in Project-Based, Service-Enhanced Firms: The Construction of Complex Products and Systems.” Research Policy 29 (7-8): 955–972. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, C., and C. Le Bas. 2005. “Uses Without Too Many Abuses of Patent Citations Or the Simple Economics of Patent Citations As a Measure of Value and Flows of Knowledge.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14 (5): 333–338. doi:10.1080/1043859042000307310.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1990. “Patent Statistics As Economic Indicators: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature28 (4): 1661–1707. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2727442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2001. The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Helmers, C. 2017. “Choose the Neighbour Before the House: Agglomeration Externalities in a UK Science Park.” Journal of Economic Geography 19 (1): 31–55. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. R. L. 1996. “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 8 (2): 91–106. doi:10.1080/09537329608524237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. R. L. 2002. “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography.” Urban Studies 39 (5-6): 871–884. doi:10.1080/00420980220128354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue, H., K. Nakajima, and Y. U. Saito. 2019. “Localization of Collaborations in Knowledge Creation.” The Annals of Regional Science 62 (1): 119–140. doi:10.1007/s00168-018-0889-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intellectual Property Office. 2018. Manual of Patent Practice. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/manual-of-patent-practice-mopp.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M., I. Hatfield, L. King, L. Raikes, and A. Stirling. 2017. Industrial Strategy: Steering Structural Change in the UK Economy. Discussion paper, Institute for Public Policy Research, London. https://www.ippr.org/files/publications/pdf/cej-industrial-strategy-steering-change-in-the-uk-economy-november-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1986. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence From Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value.” American Economic Review 76 (5): 984–1001. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1816464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1989. “Real Effects of Academic Research.” American Economic Review 79 (5): 957–70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1831431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., M. S. Fogarty, and B. A. Banks. 1998. “Evidence From Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of NASA and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (2): 183–205. doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., and M. Trajtenberg. 1996. “Flows of Knowledge From Universities and Federal Laboratories: Modeling the Flow of Patent Citations Over Time and Across Institutional and Geographic Boundaries.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 (23): 12671–12677. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.23.12671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., and M. Trajtenberg. 2002. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and M. S. Fogarty. 2000. “Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence From a Survey of Inventors.” American Economic Review 90 (2): 215–218. doi:10.1257/aer.90.2.215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers As Evidenced by Patent Citations.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 577–598. doi:10.2307/2118401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. C. 1993. “Simple Boundary Correction for Kernel Density Estimation.” Statistics and Computing 3 (3): 135–146. doi:10.1007/BF00147776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, W. R., and S. D. Kominers. 2015. “Agglomerative Forces and Cluster Shapes.” Review of Economics and Statistics 97 (4): 877–899. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H.-S., J. Lee, S. Lee, and R. Oh. 2022. “Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Trends in Geographic Localization, 1976–2015.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 31 (3): 1–25. doi:10.1080/10438599.2020.1787001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe, R. 2012. “Strategic Citation.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 94 (1): 320–333. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., M. M. Fischer, and T. Scherngell. 2007. “Knowledge Spillovers Across Europe: Evidence From a Poisson Spatial Interaction Model with Spatial Effects.” Papers in Regional Science 86 (3): 393–421. doi:10.1111/pirs.2007.86.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, C. R. 1996. “Local Likelihood Density Estimation.” The Annals of Statistics 24 (4): 1602–1618. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2242741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lybbert, T. J., and N. J. Zolas. 2014. “Getting Patents and Economic Data to Speak to Each Other: An ‘Algorithmic Links with Probabilities’ Approach for Joint Analyses of Patenting and Economic Activity.” Research Policy 43 (3): 530–542. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machacek, E., and M. Hess. 2019. “Whither ‘High-Tech’ Labor? Codification and (De-)skilling in Automotive Components Value Chains.” Geoforum 99: 287–295. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcon, E., and F. Puech. 2003. “Evaluating the Geographic Concentration of Industries Using Distance-Based Methods.” Journal of Economic Geography 3 (4): 409–428. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbg016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurseth, P. B., and B. Verspagen. 2002. “Knowledge-Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citation Analysis.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104 (4): 531–545. doi:10.1111/sjoe.2002.104.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, S. J. 2013. “Tacit-Rich Districts and Globalization: Changes in the Italian Textile and Apparel Production System.” Socio-Economic Review 11 (4): 657–685. doi:10.1093/ser/mwt005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, J., and B. Bettels. 2001. “Patent Citation Analysis. A Closer Look at the Basic Input Data From Patent Search Reports.” Scientometrics 51 (1): 185–201. doi:10.1023/A:1010577030871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., R. Paci, and S. Usai. 2005. “Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions.” Environment and Planning A 37 (10): 1793–1812. doi:10.1068/a37341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., R. Paci, and S. Usai. 2006. “Innovation Clusters in the European Regions.” European Planning Studies 14 (9): 1235–1263. doi:10.1080/09654310600933330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata, Y., R. Nakajima, R. Okamoto, and R. Tamura. 2014. “Localized Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: A Distance-Based Approach.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 96 (5): 967–985. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata, Y., R. Nakajima, and R. Tamura. 2017. Testing for Localization: A New Approach. Discussion Paper DP2017–017, Keio-IES, Tokyo. https://ies.keio.ac.jp/publications/7688/.
   Google Scholar
• Nesan, J. 2005. “Factors Influencing Tacit Knowledge in Construction.” Construction Economics and Building 5 (1): 48–57. doi:10.5130/AJCEB.v5i1.2943.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. 2019. Postal Geography. ONS, Newport. https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/ukgeographies/postalgeography.
   Google Scholar
• Paci, R., and E. Batteta. 2003. Innovation Networks and Knowledge Flows across the European Regions. Working Paper CRENoS 200313, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
   Google Scholar
• Paci, R., and S. Usai. 2009. “Knowledge Flows Across European Regions.” Annals of Regional Science43: 669–690. doi:10.1007/s00168-008-0256-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathirage, C. P., D. G. Amaratunga, and R. P. Haigh. 2007. “Tacit Knowledge and Organisational Performance: Construction Industry Perspective.” Journal of Knowledge Management 11 (1): 115–126. doi:10.1108/13673270710728277.
   Google Scholar
• Peri, G. 2005. “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (2): 308–322. doi:10.1162/0034653053970258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1967. The Tacit Knowledge Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quatraro, F., and S. Usai. 2017. “Are Knowledge Flows All Alike? Evidence From European Regions.” Regional Studies 51 (8): 1246–1258. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1240867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch, J. E. 1993. “Productivity Gains From Geographic Concentration of Human Capital: Evidence From the Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics 34: 380–400. doi:10.1006/juec.1993.1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichstein, T., A. J. Salter, and D. M. Gann. 2005. “Last Among Equals: A Comparison of Innovation in Construction, Services and Manufacturing in the UK.” Construction Management and Economics 23 (6): 631–644. doi:10.1080/01446190500126940.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, M., and W. M. Cohen. 2013. “Lens Or Prism? Patent Citations As a Measure of Knowledge Flows From Public Research.” Management Science 59 (2): 504–525. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. S., and W. C. Strange. 2008. “The Attenuation of Human Capital Spillovers.” Journal of Urban Economics 64: 373–389. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. P. 1998. “On the Dynamics of Appropriability, of Tacit and of Codified Knowledge.” Research Policy 26 (7-8): 843–856. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00066-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R., R. Bell, and V. Warren. 2021. “Keeping the Wheels of the Automotive Industry Turning: The Use of Tacit Knowledge by Product Development Workers in a Multinational Automotive Manufacturer.” Journal of Intellectual Capital 22 (6): 1106–1125. doi:10.1108/JIC-07-2020-0257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., and M. Marx. 2013. “Geographic Constraints on Knowledge Spillovers: Political Borders vs. Spatial Proximity.” Management Science 59 (9): 2056–2078. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonn, J. W., and M. Storper. 2008. “The Increasing Importance of Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Production: An Analysis of US Patent Citations, 1975–1997.” Environment and Planning A 40 (5): 1020–1039. doi:10.1068/a3930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. 2006. “Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence From Inventor- and Examiner-Added Citations.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (2): 383–388. doi:10.1162/rest.88.2.383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., and M. Fox-Kean. 2005. “Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment.” American Economic Review 95 (1): 450–460. doi:10.1257/0002828053828509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspagen, B., and W. Schoenmakers. 2004. “The Spatial Dimension of Patenting by Multinational Firms in Europe.” Journal of Economic Geography 4 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1093/jeg/4.1.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 1994. ““Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation.” Management Science 40 (4): 429–439. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar