Implementation of digital twins as a tool for increasing the efficiency of business operations

References

• Abusohyon, Islam Asem Salah, Alberto Crupi, Faezeh Bagheri, and Flavio Tonelli. 2021. “How to Set up the Pillars of Digital Twins Technology in Our Business: Entities, Challenges and Solutions.” Processes 9 (8): 1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, Morris. 2020. “A More Scientific Approach to Applied Economics: Reconstructing Statistical, Analytical Significance, and Correlation Analysis.” Economic Analysis and Policy 66: 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ata, Serhat, Hakan Murat Arslan, Abdulvahap Baydaş, and Ece Pazvant. 2021. “The Effect of Social Media Influencers’ Credibility on Consumer’s Purchase Intentions Through Attitude Toward Advertisement.” ESIC Market 53 (1): e280–e280. https://doi.org/10.7200/esicm.53.280.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, Jinsong, Dongsheng Guo, Jie Li, and Jie Zhang. 2019. “The Modelling and Operations for the Digital Twin in the Context of Manufacturing.” Enterprise Information Systems 13 (4): 534–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2018.1526324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barricelli, Barbara Rita, Elena Casiraghi, and Daniela Fogli. 2019. “A Survey on Digital Twin: Definitions, Characteristics, Applications, and Design Implications.” IEEE Access 7: 167653–167671. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazrafshan, Ameneh, and Reza Hesarzadeh. 2022. “Board Busyness and Firm Productivity.” Personnel Review 51 (3): 1138–1168. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2019-0375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berisha-Gawlowski, Angelina, Carina Caruso, and Christian Harteis. 2021. “The Concept of a Digital Twin and Its Potential for Learning Organizations.” In Digital Transformation of Learning Organizations, edited by D. Ifenthaler, Sandra Hofhues, Marc Egloffstein, and Christian Helbig, 95-114. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55878-9_6#DOI
   Google Scholar
• Buck, Christoph, John Clarke, Rui Torres de Oliveira, Kevin C. Desouza, and Parisa Maroufkhani. 2023. “Digital Transformation in Asset-Intensive Organisations: The Light and the Dark Side.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 8 (2): 100335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capgemini Research Institute. 2023. “Digital Twin Adding Intelligence to the Real World.” https://prod.ucwe.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Capgemini-Research-Institute_DigitalTwins_Web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chari, Pallavi. 2023. “2023 Year in Review: Digital Twins on AWS for Agile and Resilient Operations.” AWS. https://aws.amazon.com/ru/blogs/iot/2023-year-in-review-digital-twins-on-aws/.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Nanxu, Dongqing Sun, and Jing Chen. 2022. “Digital Transformation, Labour Share, and Industrial Heterogeneity.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 7 (2): 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digital Twin Market. 2023. “Digital Twin Market Size, Share, Statistics and Industry Growth Analysis Report by Application (Predictive Maintenance, Business Optimization, Performance Monitoring, Inventory Management), Industry (Automative & Transportation, Healthcare, Energy & Utilities), Enterprise and Geography-Global Growth Driver and Industry Forecast to 2028”. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/digital-twin-market-225269522.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dobni, C. Brooke, Grant Alexander Wilson, and Mark Klassen. 2022. “Business Practices of Highly Innovative Japanese Firms.” Asia Pacific Management Review 27 (3): 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos, Carlos Henrique, Renan Delgado Camurça Lima, Fabiano Leal, José Antonio de Queiroz, Pedro Paulo Balestrassi, and José Arnaldo Barra Montevechi. 2020. “A Decision Support Tool for Operational Planning: A Digital Twin Using Simulation and Forecasting Methods.” Production 30: e20200018. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20200018
   Google Scholar
• Duque, Rafael, Crescencio Bravo, Santos Bringas, and Daniel Postigo. 2024. “Leveraging a Visual Language for the Awareness-Based Design of Interaction Requirements in Digital Twins.” Future Generation Computer Systems 153: 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2023.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Laurie Hughes, Abdullah M. Baabdullah, Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete, Mihalis Giannakis, Mutaz M. Al-Debei, Denis Dennehy, Bhimaraya Metri, Dimitrios Buhalis, Christy M. K. Cheung, et al. 2022. “Metaverse Beyond the Hype: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Emerging Challenges, Opportunities, and Agenda for Research, Practice and Policy, International Journal of Information Management 66: 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Qianying, Qi Wang, and Cisheng Wu. 2023. “Construction of Enterprise Digital Service and Operation Platform Based on Internet of Things Technology.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 8 (4): 100433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunessee, Saileshsingh, and Tom Lane. 2023. “Changing Perceptions About Experimentation in Economics: 50 Years of Evidence from Principles Textbooks.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 107: 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, Sinh Duc, Sandeep Kumar Dey, Mark Ratilla, and Zuzana Tučková. 2023. “Investigating the Antecedents of Ecotourism and Destination Loyalty Among Vietnamese Tourists: An Expectation–Confirmation Perspective.” Global Business Review, in press. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231174740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interbrand. 2023. “Best Global Brands 2023. How Iconic Brands Lead Across Arenas.” https://interbrand.com/best-global-brands/.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin-Hunt, Alex. 2023. “Top 100 Global Innovation Leaders (2020-2022).” FDI Intelligence. https://www.fdiintelligence.com/content/feature/global-innovation-leaders-2022-edition-82527.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Adnan, and Meng Tao. 2022. “Knowledge Absorption Capacitys Efficacy to Enhance Innovation Performance Through Big Data Analytics and Digital Platform Capability.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 7 (3): 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, Mark, Grant Alexander Wilson, and C. Brooke Dobni. 2023. “The Long Game of Innovation and Value Creation.” Journal of Business Strategy 44 (4): 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-02-2022-0035.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V. Sruthi, and C. Mohammed Firoz. 2023. “Assessment of Regional Environmental Quality Using Cluster Analysis.” Environmental Development 45: 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kritzinger, W., M. Karner, G. Traar, J. Henjes, and W. Sihn. 2018. “Digital Twin in Manufacturing: A Categorical Literature Review and Classification.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (11): 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Chia-Chi. 2023. “Analyses of the Operating Performance of Information Service Companies Based on Indicators of Financial Statements.” Asia Pacific Management Review 28 (4): 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Silin, Luwen Gao, Chunjia Han, Brij Gupta, Wadee Alhalabi, and Sultan Almakdi. 2023. “Exploring the Effect of Digital Transformation on Firms’ Innovation Performance.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 8 (1): 100317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Runhui, Zaiyang Xie, Yunhong Hao, and Jie Wang. 2020. “Improving High-Tech Enterprise Innovation in Big Data Environment: A Combinative View of Internal and External Governance.” International Journal of Information Management 50: 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, Francesco, Letizia Nicoletti, and Antonio Padovano. 2022. “New Perspectives and Results for Smart Operators in Industry 4.0: A Human-Centered Approach.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 163: 107824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Yangguang, Qingfei Min, Zhiyong Liu, and Yibin Wang. 2019. “An IoT-Enabled Simulation Approach for Process Planning and Analysis: A Case from Engine Remanufacturing Industry.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 32 (4-5): 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2019.1571237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Anita, Andrew Baker, and Naveen Donthu. 2019. “Capturing Dynamics in the Value for Brand Recommendations from Word-of-Mouth Conversations.” Journal of Business Research 104: 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matricano, Diego, and Laura Castadi. 2023. “Do R&D Activities Foster Globalization of Young Innovative Companies? Empirical Evidence from the Italian Energy Industry.” Journal of International Management 29 (4): 101043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2023.101043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melesse, Tsega Y., Valentina Di Pasquale, and Stefano Riemma. 2020. “Digital Twin Models in Industrial Operations: A Systematic Literature Review.” Procedia Manufacturing 42: 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.084.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft. n.d. “AI for Everything You Do.” https://www.microsoft.com/uk.
   Google Scholar
• Nyagadza, Brighton. 2022. “Sustainable Digital Transformation for Ambidextrous Digital Firms: Systematic Literature Review, Meta-Analysis and Agenda for Future Research Directions.” Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship 1 (3): 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100020.
   Google Scholar
• Pires, Flávia, Ana Cachada, José Barbosa, António Paulo Moreira, and Paulo Leitão. 2019. “Digital Twin in Industry 4.0: Technologies, Applications and Challenges.” In 2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), edited by Flávia Pires, 721–726. Helsinki, Finland: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN41052.2019.8972134
   Google Scholar
• Psarommatis, Foivos, and Gokan May. 2022. “A Literature Review and Design Methodology for Digital Twins in the Era of Zero Defect Manufacturing.” International Journal of Production Research 61 (16): 5723–5743. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2101960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psarommatis, Foivos, and Gokan May. 2023. “A Standardized Approach for Measuring the Performance and Flexibility of Digital Twins.” International Journal of Production Research 61 (20): 6923–6938. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2139005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, Qinglin, and Fei Tao. 2018. “Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison.” IEEE Access 6: 3585–3593. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regal, Andrés, Jesús Gonzalez-Feliu, and Michelle Rodriguez. 2023. “A Spatio-Functional Logistics Profile Clustering Analysis Method for Metropolitan Areas.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 179: 103312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semeraro, Concetta, Mario Lezoche, Hervé Panetto, and Michele Dassisti. 2021. “Digital Twin Paradigm: A Systematic Literature Review.” Computers in Industry 130: 103469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, Jaehyun, Damdae Park, Hoon Taek Chung, Hyuncheol Ryu, Gobong Choi, and Jong Min Lee. 2022. “Techno-Economic Analysis of Micro-Grid System Design Through Climate Region Clustering.” Energy Conversion and Management 274: 116411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, Rainer, Carina Fresemann, and Kai Lindow. 2019. “Development and Operation of Digital Twins for Technical Systems and Services.” CIRP Annals 68 (1): 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleiman, Zhanybek, Sabit Shaikholla, Dinara Dikhanbayeva, Essam Shehab, and Ali Turkyilmaz. 2022. “Industry 4.0: Clustering of Concepts and Characteristics.” Cogent Engineering 9 (1): 2034264. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2034264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagscherer, Florian, and Claus-Christian Carbon. 2023. “Leadership for Successful Digitalization: A Literature Review on Companies’ Internal and External Aspects of Digitalization.” Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship 2 (2): 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2023.100039.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, Fei, He Zhang, Ang Liu, and Andrew YC Nee. 2019. “Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 15 (4): 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2873186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, Shaun, Oliver Stoll, Jürg Meierhofer, and Simon Züst. 2021. “Digital Twin Providing New Opportunities for Value Co-Creation Through Supporting Decision-Making.” Applied Sciences 11 (9): 3750. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093750.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Grant Alexander, Tyler Case, and C. Brooke Dobni. 2023. “A Global Study of Innovation-Oriented Firms: Dimensions, Practices, and Performance.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 187: 122257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Louise, and Stuart Davidson. 2020. “How to Tell the Difference Between a Model and a Digital Twin.” Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences 7 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-020-00147-4.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Li Da, Eric L. Xu, and Ling Li. 2018. “Industry 4.0: State of the Art and Future Trends.” International Journal of Production Research 56 (8): 2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Haiwen, Lin Ma, Jiao Sun, Hansheng Lin, and Matthias Thürer. 2019. “Digital Twin in Services and Industrial Product Service Systems:.” Procedia CIRP 83: 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.131.
   Google Scholar
• Zio, Enrico. 2022. “Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where Are We and Where Do We (Need to) Go in Theory and Practice.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 218 (Part A): 108119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108119.
   Google Scholar