Renegotiating domestic violence: police attitudes and decisions concerning arrest

References

• ACPO/NPIA, 2008. Guidance on investigating domestic abuse. London: ACPO/NPIA .
   Google Scholar
• Bayley, D. and Bittner, E., 1984. Learning the skills of policing. Law and contemporary problems, 47 (4), 35–59. doi: 10.2307/1191686
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R., 1998. Transforming qualitative information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carolyn-Stewart, C., Langan, D., and Hannem, S., 2013. Victim experiences and perspectives on police responses to verbal violence in domestic settings. Feminist criminology, 8 (4), 269–294. doi: 10.1177/1557085113490782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College of Policing, 2015. Authorised Professional Practice on domestic abuse. Available from: http://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/major-investigation-and-public-protection/domestic-abuse/ [Accessed November 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. and Newbold, G., 2010. Presumptive arrest in partner assault: use of discretion and problems of compliance in the New Zealand police. Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology, 43 (1), 51–75. doi: 10.1375/acri.43.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, C., Burgess-Proctor, A., and Elis, L., 2008. Police officer perceptions of intimate partner violence: an analysis of observational data. Violence and victims, 23 (6), 683–696. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.23.6.683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, M., 2016. Domestic violence and the United States’ criminal justice system. In: M. Bosworth, C. Hoyle and L. Zedner, eds. Changing contours of criminal justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Eitle, D., 2005. The influence of mandatory arrest policies, police organisational characteristics, and situational variables on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Crime and delinquency, 51 (4), 573–597. doi: 10.1177/0011128705277784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracia, E., García, F., and Lila, M., 2014. Male police officers’ law enforcement preferences in cases of intimate partner violence versus non-intimate interpersonal violence. Do sexist attitudes and empathy matter? Criminal justice and behavior, 41 (10), 1195–1213. doi: 10.1177/0093854814541655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HMIC, 2014. Everyone’s business: improving the police response to domestic abuse. Available from: https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/publications/improving-the-police-response-to-domestic-abuse/ [Accessed November 2016].
   Google Scholar
• HMIC, 2015. Increasingly everyone’s business: a progress report on the police response to domestic abuse. Available from: http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/wp-content/uploads/increasingly-everyones-business-domestic-abuse-progress-report.pdf [Accessed November 2016].
   Google Scholar
• HMIC, 2017. State of policing: the annual assessment of policing in England and Wales 2016. Part 2: Our inspections. Available from: https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/publications/state-of-policing-the-annual-assessment-of-policing-in-england-and-wales-2015/ [Accessed June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• HMIC/HMcpsi, 2004. Violence at home: a joint thematic inspection of the investigation and prosecution of cases involving domestic violence. London: HMIC/HMcpsi.
   Google Scholar
• Holdaway, S., 1983. Inside the British police. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 1990. Home office circular 60/1990: domestic violence. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2000. Domestic violence: revised circular to the police. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2005. Domestic violence: a national report. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, C., 1998. Negotiating domestic violence: police, criminal justice and victims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, C. and Sanders, A., 2000. Police response to domestic violence: from victim choice to victim empowerment? British journal of criminology, 40 (1), 14–36. doi: 10.1093/bjc/40.1.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. and Dai, M., 2016. Police enforcement of domestic violence laws: supervisory control or officer prerogatives? Justice quarterly, 33 (2), 185–208. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2014.887762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, R., 1999. Patterns of arrest in domestic violence encounters: identifying a police decision-making model. Journal of criminal justice, 27 (1), 65–79. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00037-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., 1999. Domestic violence matters. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., et al., 2013. Evaluation of the pilot of domestic violence protection orders. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. and Westmarland, N., 2016. Naming and defining ‘domestic violence’: lessons from research with violent men. Feminist review, 112 (1), 113–127. doi: 10.1057/fr.2015.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matczak, A., Hatzidimitriadou, E., and Lindsay, J., 2011. Review of domestic violence policies in England and Wales. London: Kingston University and St George‘s, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, C., Garner, J., and Fagan, J. 2002. The preventive effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: research, policy and theory. Criminology and public policy, 2 (1), 51–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2002.tb00107.x
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, A., 2015. Measuring Coercive Control: What Can We Learn From National Population Surveys?. Violence Against Women, 21, 355–375. doi: 10.1177/1077801214568032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, A., and Hohl, K., 2016. The ‘Golden Thread’: Coercive Control and Risk Assessment for Domestic Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, doi:10.1177/0886260516675464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pence, E. and Paymar, M., 1993. Education groups for men who batter: the Duluth Model. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J., 2012. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., 2000. The effect of a domestic violence policy change on police officers’ schemata. Criminal justice and behavior, 27 (5), 600–624. doi: 10.1177/0093854800027005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, M., 2007. Rendering visible the invisible: police discretion, professionalism and decision-making. Policing and society, 17 (3), 279–294. doi: 10.1080/10439460701497352
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L., 2014. Transforming justice with knowledge. High Sheriff of London’s Talk, 10 March.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. and Berk, R., 1984. The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American sociological review, 49 (2), 261–272. doi: 10.2307/2095575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinden, P. and Stephens, J., 1999. Police perceptions of domestic violence: the nexus of victim, perpetrator, event, self and law. Policing: an international journal of police strategies and management, 22 (3), 313–327. doi: 10.1108/13639519910285071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. and Gray, J., 1983. Police and people in London: Vol 4, the police in action. London: Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stanko, E., 1985. Intimate intrusions: women’s experience of male violence. London: Unwyn Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Stanko, E., 1995. Policing domestic violence: Dilemmas and contradictions. Australian & New Zealand journal of criminology, 28, 31–44. doi: 10.1177/00048658950280S104
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E., 2013. The dangers of dangerousness assessment. Family and intimate partner violence quarterly, 6, 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, P., 1999. Police (canteen) sub-culture: an appreciation. British journal of criminology, 39 (2), 287–309. doi: 10.1093/bjc/39.2.287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westmarland, L., 2001. Gender and policing: sex, power and police culture. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar