Staff and offender perspectives of Integrated Offender Management and the impact of its introduction on arrests and risk of reoffending in one police force region

References

• Annison, H., Bradford, B., and Grant, E., 2015. Theorizing the role of ‘the brand’ in criminal justice: the case of Integtrated Offender Management. Criminology & criminal justice, 15(4), 387–406. doi: 10.1177/1748895815572164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J. and Andrews, D.A., 2007. Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Available from: https://cpoc.memberclicks.net/assets/Realignment/risk_need_2007-06_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R., and McNeill, F., 2005. The place of the office-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation journal, 52, 221–242. doi: 10.1177/0264550505055112
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge City Council, 2010. Integrated offender management: member – led review. Available from: http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/CMSWebsite/Apps/Committees/AgendaItem.aspx?agendaItemID=4088
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P., 2003. Managing offenders, reducing crime: a new approach (correctional services review). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Justice Joint Inspection, 2014. A joint inspection of the integrated offender management approach. London: Criminal Justice Joint Inspection.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., n.d. Learning from the diamond initiative evaluation. Available from: http://www.policyreview.tv/document_stream.php?document_id=3963&conf_id=598
   Google Scholar
• Day, A., et al., 2014. Professional attitudes to sex offenders: implications for multiagency and collaborative working. Sexual abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 6, 12–19. Available from: http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=775756308532845;res=IELNZC
   Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, C., et al., 2008. Readiness to change, partner violence subtypes, and treatment outcomes among men in treatment for partner assault. Violence and victims, 23, 446–475. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.23.4.446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrall, S., 2002. Rethinking what works with offenders: probation, social context and desistance from crime. Plymouth: TJ International.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D., 1986. Age and crime. Crime and justice, 7, 189–250. doi: 10.1086/449114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graffam, J., et al., 2004. Variables affecting successful reintegration as perceived by offenders and professionals. Journal of offender rehabilitation, 40, 147–171. doi: 10.1300/J076v40n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, U.A., Gumpert, C.H., and Grann, M., 2001. Against all odds a qualitative follow-up study of high-risk violent offenders who were not reconvicted. Journal of interpersonal violence, 16, 1048–1065. doi: 10.1177/088626001016010005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam Centre for Community Justice, 2014. Integrated offender management: pooling resources and expertise and creating effective working partnerships. Available from: http://www.acjrd.ie/files/Professor_Paul_Senior_Martin_Tansey_Memorial_Lecture_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holdsworth, E., et al., 2016. The development of a program engagement theory for group offending behavior programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 1479–1499 doi: 10.1177/0306624X15624177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2009. Integrated offender management: government policy statement. Available from: http://www.oldham.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/408/government_policy_for_managing_high_risk_offenders
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2010. Integrated offender management: key principles. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/118043/IOM-Key-Principles-Guidance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. 2013. Integrated offender management: findings from the 2013 survey. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. 2015. Integrated offender management: key principles. Available from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/406865/HO_IOM_Key_Principles_document_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. and Maguire, M., 2001. Public protection, partnership and risk penality: the multi-agency risk management of sexual and violent offenders. Punishment and society, 3, 237–264. doi: 10.1177/14624740122228311
   Google Scholar
• Koons, B., et al., 1997. Expert and offender perceptions of program elements linked to successful outcomes for incarcerated women. Crime & delinquency, 43, 512–532. doi: 10.1177/0011128797043004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laub, J.H. and Sampson, R.J., 2001. Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and justice, 28, 1–69. doi: 10.1086/652208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, S., Auburn, T., and Kibblewhite, K., 1999. Working with sex offenders: the perceptions and experiences of professionals and paraprofessionals. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 43, 103–119. doi: 10.1177/0306624X99431010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, K.M., 2009. Probation management of sex offenders: an analysis of co-facilitators’ perceptions of offender progress in treatment. Criminal justice review, 34, 382–403. doi: 10.1177/0734016808328671
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., 2001. Making good: how convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., and Farrall, S., 2004. Desistance from crime: a theoretical reformulation. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 43, 171–194 doi: 10.1007/978-3-322-80474-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Mawby, R. and Worrall, A., 2004. ‘Polibation’ revisited: policing and profilic offender projects. International journal of police science and management, 6, 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Mawby, R. and Worrall, A., 2011. ‘They were very threatening about do-gooding bastards’: probation’s changing relationships with the police and probation services in England and Wales. European journal of probation, 3, 78–94. doi: 10.1177/206622031100300306
   Google Scholar
• McCartan, K., 2012. Professionals’ understanding of government strategies for the management of child sexual abusers. Probation journal, 59, 124–137. doi: 10.1177/0264550512438603
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., 2003. Desistance-focused probation practice. In:W.H. Chui and M. Nellis, eds. Moving probation forward: evidence, arguments and practice. Harlow: Pearson Longman, pp. 146–162.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., 2006. A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology and criminal justice, 6 (1), 39–62. doi: 10.1177/1748895806060666
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., et al., 2012. How and why people stop offending: discovering desistance. Available from: https://www.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/iriss-insight-15.pdfshad maruna
   Google Scholar
• Millie, A. and Erol, R., 2006. Rehabilitation and resettlement: a study of prolific offender case management in Birmingham, United Kingdom. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 50, 691–710. doi: 10.1177/0306624X06287193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2013. Transforming rehabilitation: a strategy for reform. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.  Available from: https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/transforming-rehabilitation/results/transforming-rehabilitation-response.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, P. and Maguire, M., 2006. End-to-end in tears? Prospects for the effectiveness of the National Offender Management Model. In:M. Hough, R. Allen, and U. Padel, eds. Reshaping probation and prisons: the new offender management framework. Bristol: The Policy Press, 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rex, S., 1999. Desistance from offending: experiences of probation. The howard journal of criminal justice, 38, 366–383. doi: 10.1111/1468-2311.00141
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., 2013. Transforming rehabilitation: transforming the occupational identity of probation workers? British journal of community justice, 11, 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Sapouna, M., Bisset, C., and Conlong, A.M., 2011What works to reduce reoffending: a summary of the evidence. Scotland: Justice Analytical Services.
   Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C.S. and Maschi, T.M., 2012. Probation officers’ perspectives on interagency collaboration for juvenile offenders with mental health problems. Psychiatric services, 63, 830–833. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senior, P., et al., 2011. Process evaluation of five integrated offender management pioneer areas. London: Ministry of Justice & Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, J., et al., 2012. The quality of probation supervision: a literature review. Sheffield: Centre of Criminological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A.E. and Ariel, B., 2013. The Bristol integrated offender management scheme: a pseudo-experimental test of desistance theory. Policing: a journal of policy and practice, 7, 123–134. doi: 10.1093/police/pas053
   Google Scholar
• Wong, K., 2013. Integrated offender management: assessing the impact and benefits – holy grail or fool’s errand? British journal of community justice, 11, 59–81.
   Google Scholar