Regulating the power of Chinese police through the exclusionary rule – an empirical study

References

• Aviram, H., 2011. Packer in context: formalism and fairness in the due process model. Law & social inquiry, 36 (1), 237–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01230.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddulph, S., 2012. Legal reform and administrative detention powers in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., 2010. Great achievements in the reform of China’s criminal evidence system (Gaige Wanshan Xingshi Zhengju Zhidu De Zhongda Chengjiu). The Prosecutorial Daily (Jiancha Ribao), 1 June.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R., 2011. China’s new exclusionary rule: an introduction. Columbia journal of Asian law, 24 (2), 230–246.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., 2016. Measuring police subcultural perceptions: a study of frontline police officers in China. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dressler, J. and Michaels, A.C., 2017. Understanding criminal procedure: investigation. 7th ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, S., 2012. Why is it difficult to exclude the illegal evidence? ( Feifa Zhengju Weihe Nanyi Youxiao Paichu ?) Legal forum ( Faxue Luntan), 4, 116–123.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Z., 2017. Exclusion of illegally obtained confessions in China: an empirical perspective. The international journal of evidence & proof, 21 (1/2), 30–51. doi: 10.1177/1365712716674799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, G. and Zeng, M., 2001. Peiwu Du’s desperate complaint with confessions obtained through torture in a wrongful conviction case (Xingxun Bigong Niang Yuan’an Siqiu Dupeiwu Yishu De Xuelei Kongsu). Southern Weekly (Nanfang Zhoumo), 24 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, K.J., 2009. Citizens engage the constitution: the Sun Zhigang incident and constitutional review proposals in the People’s Republic of China. In: S. Balme and M.W. Dowdle, eds. Building constitutionalism in China. New York: Palgrave MacMilan, 221.
   Google Scholar
• He, J., 2016. Back from the dead: wrongful convictions and criminal justice in China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S., 2012. Chinese wrongful convictions: causes and prevention. University of cincinnati law review, 80 (4), 1195–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, W., 2013. The judicial reform in China: the status quo and future directions. Indiana journal of global legal studies, 20, 185–220. doi: 10.2979/indjglolegstu.20.1.185
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, N., 2015. Convicting the innocent: what causes wrongful convictions in China? The Chinese journal of comparative law, 3 (1), 161–174. doi: 10.1093/cjcl/cxv002
   Google Scholar
• Ke, L., 2007. Issues that must be paid attention to when amending the CPL ( Tantan Xiugai Xingshi Susongfa Bixu Gaodu Zhongshi De Jige Wenti). The Juris ( Faxue Jia), 4, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Leo, R.A., 2008. Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M., 2011. Controlling abuse to maintain control: the exclusionary rule in China. New York university journal of international law and policy, 43, 629.
   Google Scholar
• Li, G., 2006. Xinjian Zhao, a farmer, who was sentenced to a suspended death penalty was acquitted after 8 years in jail (Nongmin Zhaoxinjian Beipan Sihuan Guanya Banianhou Shifang). Legal Daily (Fazhi Ribao), 6 Nov.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, J., 2016. An report on Chengdu Court’s exclusion of illegal evidence (Chengdu Fayuan Paichu Feifa Zhengju De Shizheng Diaocha Baogao). Available from: http://cdfy.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2017/01/id/2509971.shtml [Accessed 8 March 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., 2011. The failure of criminal judicial process ( Xingshi Sifa Chengxu De Yihua). Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong university ( Shanghai Jiao Tong Daxue Xuebo), 4, 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Gu, Z., and Lin, X., 2017. The gap between law and practice: an empirical study on China’s high pretrial detention rate. Hong Kong law journal, 2, 525–554.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X. and Shen, W., 2016. Reforms to China’s pretrial detention system: the role of the procuratorate. International journal of law, crime and justice, 44, 183–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., 2007a. An empirical legal studies on China’s police interrogation ( Renzhen duidai Zhencha Xunwen: Jiyu Shizheng De Kaocha). Criminal Science ( Zhongguo Xingshi Fa Zazhi), 5, 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., 2007b. Confession and evidence in the case files: an empirical study ( Anjuanzhong De Kougong Yu Zhengju: Yige Shizheng De Jiaodu). Journal of people’s public security university of China ( Zhongguo Renmin Gongan Daxue Xuebao), 6, 140–149.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. and Halliday, T.C., 2009. Recursivity in legal change: lawyers and reforms of China’s criminal procedure Law. Law and social inquiry, 34, 911–950. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01169.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. and Halliday, T.C., 2011. Political liberalism and political embeddedness: understanding politics in the work of Chinese criminal defense lawyers. Law & society review, 45 (4), 831–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Wang, Z., and Gu, R., 2005. An investigation on a 19-year-ago wife-murder case (Shijiu Nianqian Shaqi Yian Diaocha). New Culture Newpaper (Xin wenhua Bao), 25 July.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Z., 2013. The pain rule for the exclusion of illegal confession in China ( Woguo Feifa Kougong Paichu De Tongku Guize Ji Xiangguan Wenti). Tribune of political science and law ( Zhengfa Luntan), 5, 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H., 2006. A man who had received a suspended death sentence because of illegal obtained confessions by torture was acquitted after 8 years in Jail (Nanzi Quda Chengzhao Beipan Sihuan Banian Ruyu Zhong Pingfan). Law Morning Paper (Fazhi Zaobao), 25 June.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., 1999. Comparative analysis of exclusionary rules in the United States, England, France, Germany, and Italy. Policing: an international journal of police strategies & management, 22 (3), 280–303. doi: 10.1108/13639519910285053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J., 2015. Illegal interrogation and the monitoring mechanism: a study on Chinese police’s interrogation ( Feifa Xunwen Yu Jiankong Shi Xunwen Jizhi:Yi Gongan Jiguan Zhencha Xunwen Wei Zhongxin De Kaocha). The Jurist ( Faxue Jia), 6, 116–126.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J. and Zhang, S., 2005. Focus: the whole story of Jiuming Li’s case (Tebie Guanzhu:Lijiuming Teda Yuanan Shimo). The Workers’ Daily (Gongren Ribao), 28 Feb.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J. and Zhang, L., 2016. Investigative video-taping and exclusionary rule: an empirical study ( Xunwen Luyin Luxiang Yu Feifa Zhengju Paichu:Yige Shizheng De Kaocha). Journal of Southwest university of nationalities ( Xinan Minzu Daxue Xuebao), 7, 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Maclin, T., 2013. The supreme court and the fourth amendment’s exclusionary rule. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minzner, C.F., 2011. China’s turn against law. American journal of comparative law, 59 (4), 935–984. doi: 10.5131/AJCL.2011.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou, J., 2005. On the confession-centered criminal model ( Kougong Zhongxin Zhuyi Zhibian). Hebei law review ( Hebei Faxue), 12, 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, C., 2007. Who are the guilty pleading for (Zuiren Jiushu Weishui Erming)? Representative of the People’s Daily (Renmin Daibiaobao), 13 Nov.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, H.L., 1964. Two models of the criminal process. University of pennsylvania law review, 113 (1), 1–68. doi: 10.2307/3310562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, P., 1983. The road to Mapp v. Ohio and beyond: the origins, development and future of the Exclusionary Rule in search and seizure cases. Columbia law review, 83, 1365. doi: 10.2307/1122492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C., 2005. A comparative legal study on China’s criminal coercive measure system ( Bijiao Fa Shiye Zhong De Xingshi Qiangzhi Cuoshi Zhidu). Chinese journal of law ( Faxue Yanjiu), 1, 111–125.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, X., 2012. Understanding the effect of defendant’s confession-withdrawing ( Xingshi Shenpan Zhong De Beigao Fangong Wenti). Journal of southwest university for nationalities ( Xinan Minzu Daxue Xuebo), 10, 104–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, I.Y. and Wu, Y., 2010. Chinese policing in a time of transition, 1978–2008. Journal of contemporary criminal justice, 26 (1), 20–35. doi: 10.1177/1043986209349602
   Google Scholar
• Tang, L., 2005. Investigations of wife-murder Case (Tanxun Shaqi An Juti Liucheng). The Beijing News (Xinjing Bao), 14 April.
   Google Scholar
• Thaman, S.C., 2013. Exclusionary rules in comparative law. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Time, V.M. and Dai, M., 2016. Is there room for optimism in China’s 2010 exclusionary rule and its 2012 revision? Asian journal of criminology, 11, 21–31. doi: 10.1007/s11417-015-9216-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K.C., 1998. A reflection on police abuse of power in the People’s Republic of China. Police quarterly, 1, 87–112. doi: 10.1177/109861119800100205
   Google Scholar
• Wong, K.C., 2011. Police reform in China. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, Y., 2015. Exclusionary rules in China. Columbia journal of asian law, 29 (1), 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, G., 2013. The objectivism of criminal law and exclusionary rule ( Xingfa Keguan Zhuyi Yu Feifa Zhengju Paichu). People’s procuratorate ( Renmin Jiancha), 1, 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo, W., 2015. An empirical study on the application of exclusionary rule ( Feifa Zhengju Paichu Guize Shiyong De Shizheng Yanjiu). Studies in law and business ( Fashang Yanjiu), 3, 151–160.
   Google Scholar