Policing corporate bribery: negotiated settlements and bundling

References

• Arlen, J., 2016. Prosecuting beyond the rule of law: corporate mandates imposed through deferred prosecution agreements. Journal of legal analysis, 8 (1), 191–234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/law007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, R.D., 1990. The logic of congressional action. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L.A., and Kamar, E., 2010. Bundling and entrenchment. Harvard Law review, 123 (7), 1549–1595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, P., 2007. Global legal pluralism. Southern California Law review, 80 (6), 1155–1238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeije, H., 2010. Analysis in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., 1985. To punish or persuade: enforcement of coal mine safety. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., 2002. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., and Fisse, B., 1985. Varieties of responsibility and organisational crime. Law & policy, 7 (3), 315–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1985.tb00356.x
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, R., 2017. Enforcing the FCPA: international resonance and domestic strategy. Virginia Law review, 103 (8), 1611–1681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster, R., and Buell, S.W., 2017. The market for global anticorruption enforcement. Law and Contemporary problems, 80, 193–214.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., 2019. Private policing.. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., Shepherd, D., and Blackbourn, D., 2018. “The higher you fly, the further you fall”: white-collar criminals, “special Sensitivity” and the impact of conviction in the United Kingdom. Victims & offenders, 13, 628–650. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2017.1405133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K.E., 2018. Multijurisdictional enforcement games: the case of anti-bribery Law. In: J. Arlen, ed. Research Handbook on corporate crime and financial misdealing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 151–174.
   Google Scholar
• DOJ and SEC. 2012. A resource guide to the US foreign corrupt practices act. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminalfraud/legacy/2015/01/16/guide.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Elhauge, E., 2009. Tying, bundled discounts, and the death of the single monopoly Profit theory. Harvard Law review, 123 (2), 397–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisse, B. and Braithwaite, J., 1993. Corporations, crime, and accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C., and Hess, D., 2008. Can corporate monitorship improve corporate compliance? Journal of corporation Law, 34 (3), 679–738.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, F., 1998. Criteria for sustainable corruption control. European Journal of Development research, 10 (1), 105–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09578819808426704
   Google Scholar
• Garret, B.L., 2016. Too big to jail: how prosecutors compromise with corporations. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, N., 2019. Conspicuous prosecutions in the shadows: rethinking the relationship between the FCPA’s accounting and anti-bribery provisions. Iowa Law review, 104 (2), 891–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, C., 2016. Peaks and troughs of the English deferred prosecution agreement: the lesson learned from the DPA between the SFO and ICBC SB Plc. The Journal of business Law, 2016 (5), 388–408.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, S.J., and Lee, T.H., 2019. Toward an interest group theory of foreign anti-corruption law. University of Illinois Law review, 2019 (4), 1227–1266.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K.M., and Namey, E.E., 2012. Applied thematic analysis. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, A.T., 2011. Cooperation, comity, and competition policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, S., King, C., and Lord, N., 2020. Justice for whom? The need for a principled approach to deferred prosecution in England and Wales. In: T. Søreide, A. Makinwa, eds. Negotiated settlements in bribery cases: a principled approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 309–346.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D., and Ford, C., 2007. Corporate corruption and reform undertakings: a new approach to an old problem. Cornell international Law Journal, 41 (2), 307–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock, B., 2017. Transnational bribery: when is extraterritoriality appropriate. Charleston Law review, 11 (2), 305–352.
   Google Scholar
• Hock, B., 2020. Extraterritoriality and international bribery: a collective action perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords. 2019. The Bribery Act 2010: post-legislative scrutiny. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldbribact/303/303.pdf [Accessed 15 August 2020]. .
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, W., 2016. Criminogenic organizational properties and dynamics. In: S. R. Van Slyke, M. L. Benson, F. T. Cullen, eds. The Oxford handbook of white-collar crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 435–462.
   Google Scholar
• Iossa, E., and Martimort, D., 2012. Risk allocation and the costs and benefits of public-private partnerships. The RAND Journal of Economics, 43 (3), 442–474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2012.00181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalof, L., Dan, A., and Dietz, T., 2008. Essentials of social research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, C. and Lord, N., 2018. Negotiated Justice and corporate crime: the legitimacy of civil recovery orders and deferred prosecution agreements. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• King, C. and Lord, N., 2020. Deferred prosecution agreements in England and Wales: castles made of sand? Public Law, April 2020, 307–330.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M., 2008. Organized fraud and organizing frauds: unpacking research on networks and organization. Criminology and criminal Justice, 8 (4), 389–419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895808096470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, N., 2014a. Responding to transnational corporate bribery using international frameworks for enforcement: anti-bribery and corruption in the UK and Germany. Criminology and criminal Justice, 14 (1), 100–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812474662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, N., 2014b. Regulating corporate bribery in international business: anti-corruption in the UK and Germany. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, N., Levi, M., et al., 2015. Determining the adequate enforcement of white-collar and corporate crimes in Europe. In: Van Erp, ed. The Routledge handbook of white-collar and corporate crime in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge, 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions and related documents. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/ConvCombatBribery_ENG.pdf [Accessed 16 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, B., 2009. Time to stop living vicariously: a better approach to corporate criminal liability. American criminal Law review, 46 (4), 1393–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, R., 2007. Economic analysis of law. 7th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, P., 2014. Negotiating bribery: towards increased transparency, consistency, and fairness in pretrial bargaining under the foreign corrupt practices act. Hastings business Law review, 10 (2), 347–406.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, A., 1984. Consequences of compliance and deterrence models of law enforcement for the exercise of police discretion. Law and Contemporary problems, 47 (4), 83–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1191688
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., 2002. What makes sentencing facts controversial – four problems obscured by one solution. Villanova Law review, 47 (4), 965–988.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, E., 2016. Executive action: its history, its dilemmas and its potential remedies. Journal of legal analysis, 8 (1), 1–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/law008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, N., 2018. ‘Too scared to prosecute and too scared to jail?’ a critical and comparative analysis of enforcement of financial crime Legislation against corporations in the USA and the UK. Journal of criminal Law, 82 (3), 245–263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018318773209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, N. and Pasculli, L., 2020. Corruption, Integrity and the Law: Global Regulatory Challenges. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• SEC. 2019. Walmart charged with FCPA violations. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2019-102 [Accessed 14 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Serious Fraud Office. 2017. Deferred prosecution agreement. SFO v. Rolls-Royce PLC. Available from: https://www.sfo.gov.uk/download/deferred-prosecution-agreement-sfo-v-rolls-royceplc/?wpdmdl=14777&refresh=5e96d112375d31586942226 [Accessed 14 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Serious Fraud Office. 2020. Deferred prosecution agreement. SFO v. Airbus. Available from: https://www.sfo.gov.uk/download/airbus-se-deferred-prosecution-agreement-statement-of-facts/# [Accessed 14 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Snidal, D., 1985. The limits of hegemonic stability theory. International Organization, 39 (4), 579–614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søreide, T., and Makinwa, A., eds. 2020. Negotiated settlements in bribery cases: a principled approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, D., and Wagoner, N., 2011. FCPA sanctions: too big to debar? Fordham Law review, 80 (2), 775–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuntz, W., 2004. Plea bargaining and criminal law’s disappearing shadow. Harvard Law review, 117 (8), 2548–2569. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/4093405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, E.H., 1949. White collar crime. New York: Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tombs, S., and Whyte, D., 2011. Corporate or criminal? The dangers of reducing corporate prosecutions. New Law Journal, 161 (7449), 81–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tombs, S., and Whyte, D., 2019. The shifting imaginaries of corporate crime. Journal of white collar and corporate crime, 1 (1), 16–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2631309X19882641
   Google Scholar
• Trachtman, J., 1993. International regulatory competition, externalization, and jurisdiction. Harvard international Law Journal, 34 (1), 47–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. 2013. Deferred prosecution agreement. United States vs. Total S.A., No. 13-cr-239. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/9392013529103746998524.pdf [Accessed 14 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. 2014a. Plea agreement. United States vs. Alstom SA et al., No. 14-246. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/file/189331/download [Accessed 14 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. 2014b. Hewlett-Packard Russia pleads guilty to and sentenced for bribery of Russian Government officials. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/hewlett-packard-russia-pleads-guilty-and-sentenced-bribery-russian-government-officials [Accessed 15 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. 2016. Odebrecht and Braskem plead guilty and agree to pay at least $3.5 billion in global penalties to resolve largest foreign bribery case in history. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/odebrecht-and-braskem-plead-guilty-and-agree-pay-least-35-billion-global-penalties-resolve [Accessed 14 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. 2017. Rolls-Royce plc agrees to pay $170 million criminal penalty to resolve foreign corrupt practices act case. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/rolls-royce-plc-agrees-pay-170-million-criminal-penalty-resolve-foreign-corrupt-practices-act [Accessed 14 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. 2018. Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. – Petrobras agrees to pay more than $850 million for FCPA violations. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/petrleo-brasileiro-sa-petrobras-agrees-pay-more-850-million-fcpa-violations [Accessed 30 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. 2019. FCPA corporate enforcement policy (USAM 9-47.120).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice. 2020. Airbus agrees to pay over $3.9 billion in global penalties to resolve foreign bribery and ITAR Case. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/airbus-agrees-pay-over-39-billion-global-penalties-resolve-foreign-bribery-and-itar-case [Accessed 14 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Van Erp, J. and Huisman, W., 2017. Corporate crime. In: N. South, E. Carrabine, A. Brisman, eds. The Routledge companion to criminological theory and concepts. 1st ed.Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 248–252.
   Google Scholar
• Willborn, E., 2013. Extraterritorial enforcement and prosecutorial discretion in the FCPA: a call for international prosecutorial Factors. Minnesota Journal of international Law, 22 (2), 422–452.
   Google Scholar
• Zerk, J.A. 2010. Extraterritorial jurisdiction: lessons for the business and human rights sphere from six regulatory areas. Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
   Google Scholar