810
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Discriminant Value of Personality, Motivation, and Online Relationship Quality in Predicting Attraction to Online Social Support on Facebook

&

REFERENCES

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Hayat, Z. (2011). The impact of the internet on the social lives of users: A representative sample from 13 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 585–589. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.009
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289–1295.
  • Amiel, T., & Sargent, S. L. (2004). Individual differences in internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 711–726.
  • Bachrach, Y., Kosinski, M., Graepel, T., Kohli, P., & Stillwell, D. (2012). Personality and Patterns of Facebook Usage. Web Science, 12, 12–24.
  • Barak, A., & Suler, J. (2008). Reflections on the psychology and social science of cyberspace. In A. Barak, (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., Kunkel, A., Ledbetter, A., & Chen, M. (2007). Relational quality and media use in interpersonal relationships. New Media Society, 9, 735–752.
  • Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M. C. (2004). Social interactions across media: Interpersonal communication on the Internet, telephone and face-to-face. New Media & Society, 6, 299–318.
  • Bender, J. L., Jimenez-Marroquin, M. C., & Jadad, A. R. (2011). Seeking support on Facebook: A content analysis of breast cancer groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13, e16.
  • Berger, J. A., & Buechel, E. (2012). Facebook therapy? Why do people share self-relevant content online? Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2013148 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2013148
  • Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., & Rudnicka, P. (2013). Psychological determinants of using Facebook: A research review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction29, 775–787. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.780868
  • Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of Internet ties. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Internet_ties.pdf
  • Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many Facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26, 1006–1030.
  • Burke, M., & Kraut, R. (2013, February). Using Facebook after losing a job: Differential benefits of strong and weak ties. Paper presented at CSCW’13, San Antonio, TX. Available from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.297.3853&rank=1
  • Burleson, B. R., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In M. L Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 374–420). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Butt, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 346–360.
  • Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: a theory of problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625–648.
  • Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59, 676–684.
  • Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B., & Underwood, L. (2000). Social relationships and health. In S. Cohen, L. Underwood, & B. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Costa P. T., & McCrae R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI–R) and NEO five-factor inventory: professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • DeLambo, D. A., Homa, D., Peters, R. H., DeLambo, A. M., & Chandras, K. V. (2011). Facebook and social media: Implications for counseling college students. Retrieved from http://counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas11/Article_68.pdf
  • Eastin, M. S, & LaRose, R. (2004). Alt.support: Modeling social support online. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 977–992.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media Society, 13, 873–892.
  • Georgas, J., Christakopoulou, S., Poortinga, Y. H., Angleiter, A., Goodwin, R., & Charalambopoulos, N. (1997). The relationship of family bonds to family structure and functions across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 303–320.
  • Giota, K. G., & Kleftaras, G. (2013). The role of personality and depression in problematic use of social networking sites in Greece. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7, Article 6. doi:10.5817/CP2013-3-6
  • Griffiths, F. E., Cave, J., Boardman, F., Ren, J., Pawlikowska, T., Ball, R., … Cohen, A. (2012). Social networks—The future for health care delivery. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 2233–2241.
  • Hamburger, Y. Amichai. (2002). Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 1–10.
  • Harbaugh, E. R. (2010). The effect of personality styles (level of introversion–extroversion) on social media use. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 1, 70–86.
  • Hargittai, E. (2008). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276–297.
  • Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures revisited. Behavior Science Research, 18, 285–305.
  • Ji, Y., Hwangbo, H., Yi, J., Rau, P., Fang, X., & Ling, C. (2010). The influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26, 1100–1121.
  • Kafetsios, K., & Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Emotion and support perceptions in everyday social interaction: Testing the “less is more” hypothesis in two cultures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 165–184.
  • Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E. Christensen, A. Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G. MCClintock, E. Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.) (1983). Close relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  • Kim, J., & Lee, J. E. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 359–364.
  • Kirkpatrick, D. (2010). The Facebook effect: Inside story of the company that is connecting the world. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Kleftaras, G. (1998). Depression today: Description, diagnosis, theories and research findings [Greek]. Athens, Greece: Ellinika Grammata.
  • Kleftaras, G. (2004). La dépression: Approche cognitive et comportementale [Depression: Cognitive and behavioral approach]. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
  • Kleftaras, G. (2006). Psychosocial factors and later life depressive symptoms in a Greek community sample. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 25(2), 13–32.
  • Kolmes, K. (2009). Managing Facebook as a mental health professional. Retrieved from http://drkkolmes.com/2009/06/08/managing-facebook-as-a-mental-health-professional/
  • Konsoulas, T. (2012). Facebook: Tα στατιστικάτωνEλλήνωνχρηστών [The statistics of Greek users]. Retrieved from http://www.socialsteps. gr/facebook-ta-statistika-twn-ellinwn-users/
  • Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 109–125.
  • Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74.
  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2008). Changes in use and perception of facebook. Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Retrieved from https://www.msu.edu/˜nellison/Lampe EllisonSteinfield2008.pdf
  • Landers, R. N., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2006). An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 283–293.
  • MacGeorge, E. L. (2003). Gender differences in attributions and emotions in helping contexts, Sex Roles, 48, 175–182.
  • Manago, A. M., Taylor, T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2012). Me and my 400 friends: The anatomy of college students’ Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48, 369–380. doi:10.1037/a0026338
  • McCarty, C., & Green, H. D. (2005). Personality and personal networks. Paper presented at the Sunbelt XXV Conference.
  • McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model: Issues and applications [Special issue]. Journal of Personality, 60.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51– 87). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.
  • Moreno, A. M., Jelenchick, L. A., Egan, K. G., Cox, E., Young, H., Gannon, K. E., & Becker, T. (2011). Feeling bad on Facebook: Depression disclosures by college students on a social networking site. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 447–455.
  • Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 642–647.
  • Nabi, R. L., Prestin, A., & So, J. (2013). Facebook Friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 721–727. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0521.
  • Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 175–96.
  • Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue4/ parks.html
  • Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2008). Social networking profiles: An examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. CyberPsychology & Behavior; 11, 95–97.
  • Peters, K., & Kashima, Y. (2007). From social talk to social action: Shaping the social triad with emotion sharing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 780–797.
  • Price, L., Leong, E., & Ryan, M. (2005). Motivations for social Internet use. ANZMAC 2005 Conference: Consumer Behaviour. Edith Cowan University. Available from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks/2507/
  • Qiu, L., Lin, H., & Leung, A. K.-y. (2013). Cultural differences and switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) social networking site. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 106–121.
  • Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 169–174.
  • Rau, P. L. P., Gao, Q., & Ding, Y. (2008). Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2757–2770.
  • Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arsenault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578–586.
  • Ruder, T. D., Hatch, G. M., Ampanozi, G., Thali, M. J., & Fischer, N. (2011). Suicide announcement on Facebook. Crisis, 32, 280–282. doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000086
  • Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004
  • Sadat Nurullah, A. (2012). Received and provided social support: a review of current evidence and future directions. American Journal of Health Studies. Available from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/_/print/PrintArticle.aspx?id=308741526
  • Sheldon, P. (2008, Spring). Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, pp. 39–53.
  • Swickert, R. J., Hittner, J. B., Harris, J. L., & Herring, J. A. (2002). Relationships among Internet use, personality and social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 437–451.
  • Taylor, S. E., Sherman, D. K., Kim, H. S., Jarcho, J., Takagi, K., & Dunagan, M. S. (2004). Culture and social support: Who seeks it and why? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 354–362.
  • Tichon, J. G., & Shapiro, M. (2003). The process of sharing social support in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 161–170.
  • Ulusu, Y. (2010). Determinant factors of time spent on Facebook: Brand community engagement and usage types. Journal of Yasar University, 18, 2949–2957.
  • Vasalou, A., Joinson, A. N., & Courvoisier, D. (2010). Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of “true commitment” in Facebook. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 68, 719–728.
  • Vodosek, M. (2003). Personality and the formation of social networks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, 16 August 2003, Atlanta Hilton Hotel, Atlanta, GA. Available at: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p107700_index.html
  • Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153–188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Wellman, B., & Wortley. S. (1989). Brothers’ keepers: Situating kinship relations in broader networks of social support. Sociological Perspectives, 32, 273–306.
  • White, M. H., & Dorman, S. M. (2000). Online support for caregivers analysis of an internet Alzheimer’s mail group. Computers in Nursing, 18, 168–176.
  • Wilson, K., Fornasier, S., & White, K. M. (2010). Psychological predictors of young adults’ use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 13, 173–177. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0094
  • Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0094
  • Wright, K. B., Rains, S., & Banas, J. (2010). Weak-tie support network preference and perceived life stress among participants in health-related, computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 606–624.
  • Youn, S. J., Trinh, N.-H., Shyu, I., Chang, T., Fava, M., Kvedar, J., & Yeung, A. (2013). Using online social media, Facebook, in screening for major depressive disorder among college students. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13, 74–80.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.