The Effect of Vision on Discrimination of Compliance Using a Tool

REFERENCES

• Ballantyne, G. H., & Moll, F. (2003). The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. The Surgical Clinics of North America, 83, 1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. (2009). Cues for haptic perception of compliance. Haptics, IEEE Transactions on, 2, 189–199.
   Google Scholar
• Berkson, J. (1953). A statistically precise and relatively simple method of estimating the bio-assay with quantal response, based on the logistic function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 48, 565–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bholat, O. S., Haluck, R. S., Kutz, R. H., Gorman, P. J., & Krummel, T. M. (1999). Defining the role of haptic feedback in minimally invasive surgery. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 62, 62–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brydges, R., Carnahan, H., & Dubrowski, A. (2005). Surface exploration using laparoscopic surgical instruments: The perception of surface roughness. Ergonomics, 48, 874–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, F. J., Frank, T. G., Davies, P. J., McLean, D., & Cuschieri, A. (2001). Measurements and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs. Medical Image Analysis, 5, 231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, T. R., Meglan, D., & John, N. W. (2011). The role of haptics in medical training simulators: A survey of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 4, 51–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couroussé, D., Jansson, G., Florens, J.-L., & Luciani, A. (2006). Visual and Haptic perception of object elasticity in a virtual squeezing event. EuroHaptics 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Culmer, P., Barrie, J., Hewson, R., Levesley, M., Mon-Williams, M., Jayne, D., & Neville, A. (2012). Reviewing the technological challenges associated with the development of a laparoscopic palpation device. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 8, 146–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. P., & Hole, G. (2003). How to design and report experiments. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fjeld, M. (2003). Introduction: Augmented reality-usability and collaborative aspects. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 16, 387–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. M., Hester, K. D., Green, B. G., & LaMotte, R. H. (2008). Magnitude estimation of softness. Experimental Brain Research, 191, 133–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, G. A. (2001). Biomechanics of soft tissue. The Handbook of Materials Behavior Models, 3, 1049–1063.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, K., Jang, S., Chae, J., Cho, G., & Salvendy, G. (2008). Use of decision support for clothing products on the web results in no difference in perception of tactile sensation than actually touching the material. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24, 794–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. M., Burton, P. C., & Ro, T. (2006). Visually induced feelings of touch. Brain Research, 1073, 398–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashihara, K. (2011). Optimal view angles in three-dimensional objects constructed from plane figures as mental images. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 27, 606–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazi, A. (2001). Operator performance in surgical telemanipulation. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(5), 495–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdom, F. A. A., & Prins, N. (2009). Psychophysics: a practical introduction. London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konofagou, E. E., Alam, S. K., Ophir, J., & Krouskop, T. (1997). Methods for dynamic range expansion and enhancement of the signal-to-noise ratio in elastography. Proceedings of the 1997 Ultrasonics Symposium, 1157–1160.
   Google Scholar
• Kuschel, M., Buss, M., Freyberger, F., Farber, B., & Klatzky, R. L. (2008). Visual-haptic perception of compliance: fusion of visual and haptic information. Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• LaMotte, R. H. (2000). Softness discrimination with a tool. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 1777–1786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P., & Meyers, W. C. (2004). Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Annals of Surgery, 239, 14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langrana, N., Burdea, G., Ladeji, J., & Dinsmore, M. (1997). Human performance using virtual reality tumor palpation simulation. Computers & Graphics, 21, 451–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecuyer, A., Coquillart, S., Kheddar, A., Richard, P., & Coiffet, P. (2000). Pseudo-haptic feedback: Can isometric input devices simulate force feedback? Proceedings of Virtual Reality, 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Leddy, L. S., Lendvay, T. S., & Satava, R. M. (2010). Robotic surgery: applications and cost effectiveness. Open Access Surgery, 3, 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (2009). Haptic perception: A tutorial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1439–1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeman, S., & Peyman, A. (2002). The Maxwell Model as a soft tissue descriptor. In M. Halliwell & P. N. T. Wells ( Eds.), Acoustical imaging ( pp. 357–361). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Najarian, S., Fallahnezhad, M., & Afshari, E. (2011). Advances in medical robotic systems with specific applications in surgery-a review. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 35, 19–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ottermo, M. V., Øvstedal, M., Langø, T., Stavdahl, Ø., Yavuz, Y., Johansen, T. A., & Maarvik, R. (2006). The role of tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 16, 390–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. L., Heath, W. B., Uy, C. C., Suresh, S., & Kaber, D. B. (2012). Effect of visual displays and locations on laparoscopic surgical training task. Applied Ergonomics, 43, 762–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekuler, R., & Blake, R. (1994). Perception (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, M. A., Beauregard, G. L., & Brock, D. L. (1996). The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments. Proceedings of the ASME Dynamics Systems and Control Division, 58:555–559.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, M. A., & LaMotte, R. H. (1995). Tactual discrimination of softness. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 88–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, M., Patel, R. V., & Moallem, M. (2005). Haptic feedback and sensory substitution during telemanipulated suturing. In Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (543–544). World Haptics.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meijden, O. A., & Schijven, M. P. (2009). The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: A current review. Surgical Endoscopy, 23, 1180–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. L., II, Ji, W., Howell, J. N., & Conatser, R. R., Jr. (2007). In vivo measurement of human tissue compliance (SAE Technical Paper No. 2007-01-2453).
   Google Scholar
• Wineman, A. (2009). Nonlinear viscoelastic solids—A review. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 14, 300–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, H., Zelek, J. S., & Carnahan, H. (2006). Laparoscopic surgery, perceptual limitations and force: A review. Proceedings of the First Canadian Student Conference on Biomedical Computing. Kingston Ontario: Queen’s University.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M., Tse, S., Derevianko, A., Jones, D. B., Schwaitzberg, S. D., & Cao, C. G. (2012). Effect of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery skill acquisition. Surgical Endoscopy, 1–7.
   Google Scholar