Use of Reference Frame and Movement Pattern in Haptically Enhanced 3D Virtual Environment

REFERENCES

• Alloway, T. P., Corley, M., & Ramscar, M. (2006). Seeing ahead: Experience and language in spatial perspective. Memory & Cognition, 34, 380–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amemiya, T. (2009). Haptic direction indicator for visually impaired people based on pseudo-attraction force. eMinds: International Journal on Human–Computer Interaction, 1(5), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, A., Bennardo, G., & Beller, S. (2005). Spatial frames of reference for temporal relations: A conceptual analysis in English, German, and Tongan. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 220–225.
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., Kim, J., & Choi, Y. (2001). Visual touch in virtual environments: An exploratory study of presence, multimodal interfaces, and cross-modal sensory illusions. Presence: teleoperators and virtual environments, 10, 247–265.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L. A., & Van Deman, S. R. (2004). The space in spatial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 418–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1993). Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? Cognition, 46, 223–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Logan, G. D. (1997). The influence of reference frame selection on spatial template construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 411–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, Z., Vecchi, T., Cornoldi, C., Mammarella, I., Bonino, D., Ricciardi, E., & Pietrini, P. (2008). Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 1346–1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challis, B. P., & Edwards, A. D. N. (2001). Design principles for tactile interaction. Haptic Human–Computer Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2058, 17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coluccia, E., Mammarella, I. C., & Cornoldi, C. (2009). Centred egocentric, decentred egocentric, and allocentric spatial representations in the peripersonal space of congenital total blindness. Perception, 38, 679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M. (1981). Interpretation of the spatial prepositions “in front of” and “behind.” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4, 359–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darken, R. P., & Cevik, H. (1999, March). Map usage in virtual environments: Orientation issues. In Virtual Reality, 1999. Proceedings., IEEE ( pp. 133–140). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Dinh, H. Q., Walker, N., Hodges, L. F., Song, C., & Kobayashi, A. (1999, March). Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In Virtual Reality, 1999. Proceedings., IEEE ( pp. 222–228). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Evett, L., Brown, D., Battersby, S., Ridley, A., & Smith, P. (2008). Accessible virtual environments for people who are blind–creating an intelligent virtual cane using the Nintendo Wii controller. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, 271–278.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J., & Robertson, I. H. (1998). Mental rotation and automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. J., & Strommen, E. A. (1972). The role of front-back features in children’s “front,” “back,” and “beside” placements of objects. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 18, 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. A., & Kennedy, J. M. (1990). Perspective taking, pictures, and the blind. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, G., & Larsson, K. (2002). Identification of haptic virtual objects with different degrees of complexity. Proceedings of Eurohaptics 2002, 57–60.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92, 137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. W., Avraamides, M. N., & Loomis, J. M. (2007). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, A. E., & Douglas, S. A. (2001). A shape recognition benchmark for evaluating usability of a haptic environment. Haptic Human–Computer Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2058, 151–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyung, K., Kwon, D., & Yang, G. (2006). A novel interactive mouse system for holistic haptic display in a human–computer interface. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 20, 247–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahav, O., & Mioduser, D. (2008). Haptic-feedback support for cognitive mapping of unknown spaces by people who are blind. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 66, 23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1999). Sensing and displaying spatially distributed fingertip forces in haptic interfaces for teleoperator and virtual environment systems. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8, 86–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett ( Eds.), Language and space ( pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., Cicinelli, J. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Fry, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. M., Lippa, Y., Klatzky, R. L., & Golledge, R. G. (2002). Spatial updating of locations specified by 3-D sound and spatial language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S., & Hillier, N. (2009). Characterisation of the Novint Falcon haptic device for application as a robot manipulator. Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation, 291–292.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. L., Hespanha, J. P., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2002). Touch in virtual environments. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, S. (1995). Understanding and representing spatial information. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 13, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, S. (2006). Processing spatial information from touch and movement: Implications from and for neuroscience. Touch and blindness: Psychology and neuroscience, 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, S., & Al-Attar, Z. (2004). External and body-centered frames of reference in spatial memory: Evidence from touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C. S., Li, Y., Yamaguchi, T., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2012). Haptic user interfaces for the visually impaired: Implications for haptically enhanced science learning systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28, 784–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paillard, J. (1991). Motor and representational framing of space. In J. Paillard ( Ed.), Brain and space ( pp. 163–182). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Passini, R., & Proulx, G. (1988). Wayfinding without vision an experiment with congenitally totally blind people. Environment and Behavior, 20, 227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postma, A., Zuidhoek, S., Noordzij, M. L., & Kappers, A. M. (2007). Differences between early blind, late blind and blindfolded sighted people in haptic spatial configuration learning and resulting memory traces. Perception, 36, 1253–1265.
   Google Scholar
• Prather, S., & Sathian, K. (2002). Mental rotation of tactile stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 91–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27, 741–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röder, B., Kusmierek, A., Spence, C., & Schicke, T. (2007). Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 4753–4758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, J., Espinoza, M., de Borba Campos, M., & Merabet, L. B. (2013). Enhancing orientation and mobility skills in learners who are blind through video gaming. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition, 353–356.
   Google Scholar
• Sevilla, J. A. M. (2006). Tactile virtual reality: A new method applied to haptic exploration. Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience, 121.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struiksma, M. E., Noordzij, M. L., & Postma, A. (2011). Reference frame preferences in haptics differ for the blind and sighted in the horizontal but not in the vertical plane. Perception–London, 40, 725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110, 124–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar, S., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (1995a). Mental rotation of a tactile layout by young visually impaired children. Perception, 24, 891–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar, S., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (1995b). Visually impaired children’s strategies for memorising a map. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 13, 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ungar, S., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (1996). The construction of cognitive maps by children with visual impairments. The Construction of Cognitive Maps, 32, 247–273.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, M., Amorim, M., & Berthoz, A. (2004). Navigating in a virtual three-dimensional maze: How do egocentric and allocentric reference frames interact? Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 244–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wall, S. A., & Harwin, W. (2001). A high bandwidth interface for haptic human computer interaction. Mechatronics, 11, 371–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar