Experience-Oriented and Product-Oriented Evaluation: Psychological Need Fulfillment, Positive Affect, and Product Perception

REFERENCES

• Abelson, R. P., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 619–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranyi, G. (2012). Developing a psychological model of end-users’ experience with news web sites (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Hornbæk, K. (2011). Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: A critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2689–2698). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2, 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Newman, L. S. (1994). How stories make sense of personal experiences: Motives that shape autobiographical narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 676–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, S., Kolb, N., & Hassenzahl, M. (2014). The “Hedonic” in human–computer interaction: History, contributions, and future research directions. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 305–314). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 261–268). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. (2000). Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 577–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2001). The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 13, 481–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: From usability to enjoyment (pp. 31–42). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human–Computer Interaction, 19, 319–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2008). User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine (pp. 11–15). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2010). Experience design: Technology for all the right reasons. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2011). User experience and experience design [Encyclopedia entry]. Interaction Design. Retrieved from http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/user_experience_and_experience_design.html
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., & Göritz, A. (2010). Needs, affect, and interactive products—Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22, 353–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Eckoldt, K., Diefenbach, S., Laschke, M., Lenz, E., & Kim, J. (2013). Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness. International Journal of Design, 7, 21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Klapperich, H. (2014). Convenient, clean, and efficient? The experiential costs of everyday automation. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Monk, A. (2010). The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human–Computer Interaction, 25, 235–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., & Lehner, K. (2000). Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software’s appeal. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 201–208). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience—A research agenda [Editorial]. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25, 91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M., Schiffman, S. J., & Wieckowski, T. J. (1994). The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13, 349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic quality (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Law, E., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A., & Korte, J. (2009). Understanding, scoping and defining User eXperience: A survey approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 719–728). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R., & Mayes, D. K. (2014). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Emotional Metric Outcomes (EMO) questionnaire. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30, 685–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64, 50–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241–286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partala, T., & Kallinen, A. (2012). Understanding the most satisfying and unsatisfying user experiences: Emotions, psychological needs, and context. Interacting with Computers, 24, 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partala, T., & Kujala, S. (2015). Exploring user values using the model of ten universal values. Interacting with Computers. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwv007
   Google Scholar
• Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 144–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre & every business a stage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, P., & Montgomery, N. V. (2011). I imagine, I experience, I like: The false experience effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 578–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81, 46–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, S. (2004). Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of General Psychology, 8, 179–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, G. (1992). Die Erlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart [The experience society: A contemporary cultural sociology]. Frankfurt a.M: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2001). Feelings as information: Implications for affective influences on information processing. In L. L. Martin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition (pp. 159–176). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution and judgement of well-being. Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, A., & Hornbæk, K. (in press). Does Herzberg’s notion of hygienes and motivators apply to user experience? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(4), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Tuch, A., Trusell, R., & Hornbæk, K. (2013). Analyzing users’ narratives to understand experience with interactive products. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2079–2088). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 310–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P., Wallace, J., & McCarthy, J. (2008). Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, C. W. M., & Wyer, R. S. (2004). Affect, appraisal, and consumer judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 412–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar