Sense of Touch in Training Tasks Demanding High Precision and Short Time of Execution

REFERENCES

• Alsina-Jurnetn, I., & Gutierrez-Maldonado, J. (2010). Influence of personality and individual abilities on the sense of presence experienced in anxiety triggering virtual environments. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 68, 788–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argelaguet, F., Kulik, A., Kunert, A., Andujar, C., & Froehlich, B. (2011). See-through techniques for referential awareness in collaborative virtual reality. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 69, 387–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, C., & Scapin, D. (2010). Comparing inspections and user testing for the evaluation of virtual environments. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26, 786–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacim, F., Kopper, R., & Bowman, D. (2013). Design and evaluation of 3D selection techniques based on progressive refinement. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 71, 785–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakera, R., D’Mello, S., Rodrigo, M., & Graesser, A. (2010). Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners cognitiveaffective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 68, 223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banosa, R., Guillena, V., Querob, S., Garcia-Palacios, A., Alcanizc, M., & Botellab, C. (2011). A virtual reality system for the treatment of stress-related disorders: A preliminary analysis of efficacy compared to a standard cognitive behavioral program. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 69, 602–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement. Human–Computer Interaction, 28, 40–75. doi:10.1080/07370024.2012.688468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocking, S., Gysbers, A., Wirth, W., Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., Schramm, H., …, Vorderer, P. (2004). Theoretical and empirical support for distinctions between components and conditions of spatial presence. Proceedings of the VII International Workshop on Presence, 224–231.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.N.A. (2015). Once more, with feeling: Using haptics to preserve tactile memories. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31, 65–71. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.959100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budziszewski, P., Grabowski, A., Milanowicz, M., Jankowski, J., & Dwiarek, M. (2011). Designing a workplace for workers with motion disability with computer simulation and virtual reality techniques. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 10, 355–358.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, H., & Lin, Y. (2011). Modeling of operators emotion and task performance in a virtual driving environment. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 69, 571–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A., & Cates, C. (2004). Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterisation laboratory. The Lancet, 364, 1538–1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski, A., & Jankowski, J. (2015). Virtual reality-based pilot training for underground coal miners. Safety Science, 72, 310–314. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski, A., Jankowski, J., Dźwiarek, M., & Kosiński, R. (2014). Stereovision safety system for identifying workers presence: Results of tests. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 20, 3–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juang, J., Hung, W., & Kang, S. (2013). Simcrane 3d+: A crane simulator with kinesthetic and stereoscopic. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 27, 506–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemmera, S., & Landayb, J. (2009). Toolkit support for integrating physical and digital interactions. Human–Computer Interaction, 24, 315–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., Bahn, S., & Nam, C. S. (2014). Use of reference frame and movement pattern in haptically enhanced 3d virtual environment. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30, 11. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.941275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Kim, G. (2008). Effects of haptic feedback, stereoscopy, and image resolution on performance and presence in remote navigation. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 66, 701–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateu, J., Lasala, M.J., & Alamn, X. (2014). Virtualtouch: A tool for developing mixed reality educational applications and an example of use for inclusive education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30, 815–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millet, G., Lecuyer, A., Burkhardt, J., Haliyoa, S., & Regniera, S. (2013). Haptics and graphic analogies for the understanding of atomic force microscopy. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 71, 608–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prachyabrued, M., & Borst, C. (2012). Virtual grasp release method and evaluation. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 70, 828–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragan, E., Sowndararajan, A., Kopper, R., & Bowman, D. (2010). The effects of higher levels of immersion on procedure memorization performance and implications for educational virtual environments. Presence, 19, 527–543.
   Google Scholar
• Rantala, J., Salminen, K., Raisamo, R., & Surakka, V. (2013). Touch gestures in communicating emotional intention via vibrotactile stimulation. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 71, 679–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steed, A., & Parker, C. (2005). Evaluating effectiveness of interaction techniques across immersive virtual environmental systems. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14, 511–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylaioua, S., Mania, K., Karoulis, A., & White, M. (2010). Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 68, 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichon, J., & Burgess-Limerick, R. (2011). A review of virtual reality as a medium for safety related training in mining. Journal of Health Safety Research Practice, 3, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Vatavun, R.-D., & Zait, I. A. (2013). Automatic recognition of object size and shape via user-dependent measurements of the grasping hand. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 71, 590–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velaz, Y., Lozano-Rodero, A., Suescun, A., & Gutierrez, T. (2013). Natural and hybrid bimanual interaction for virtual assembly tasks. Virtual Reality, 3, 161–171. doi:10.1007/s10055–013–0240–y
   Google Scholar
• Vorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F., Biocca, F., Saari, T., Jncke, L., …, Jncke, P. (2004). Development of the Mec Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC-SPQ). Report to the European Commission, Information, Society and Technology (IST) Program, Project Presence: MEC (IST-2001-37661).
   Google Scholar
• Witmer, B., & Singer, M. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Enviroments, 7, 225–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaldivar-Colado, U., & Garbaya, S. (2009). Virtual assembly environment modelling. Proceedings of the World Conference on Innovative VR 2009, 311–321.
   Google Scholar