Perceived Visual Complexity of In-Vehicle Information Display and Its Effects on Glance Behavior and Preferences

References

• Berlyne, D. E. (1974). The new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, G. (2003). Emotional reactions to environmental risks: Consequentialist versus ethical evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (1995). Reading habits and line bisection: A developmental approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(1), 51–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cummings, M. L., Sasangohar, F., Thornburg, K. M., Xing, J., & D’Agostino, A. (2010a). Human–system interface complexity and opacity part i: Literature review. Cambridge, MA: Massachusettes Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, M. L., Sasangohar, F., Thornburg, K. M., Xing, J., & D’Agostino, A. (2010b). Human–system interface complexity and opacity part ii: Methods and tools to assess HIS complexity. Cambridge, MA: Massachusettes Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• De Angeli, A., Sutcliffe, A., & Hartmann, J. (2006, June). Interaction, usability and aesthetics: What influences users’ preferences? In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 271–280). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y. F., Ling, C., & Hua, L. S. (2007). Effect of glance duration on perceived complexity and segmentation of user interfaces. In J. A. Jacko (Ed.), 12th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (HCII2007). HCI Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments (pp. 605–614). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Drożdż, S., Kwapień, J., Speth, J., & Wojcik, M. (2002). Identifying complexity by means of matrices. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 314(1), 355–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, B. (1995). What is Complexity? The philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution. The evolution of complexity. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Engström, J., Johansson, E., & Östlund, J. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2), 97–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissler, G., Zinkhan, G., & Watson, R. T. (2001). Web home page complexity and communication effectiveness. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2(1), 2.
   Google Scholar
• Geissler, G. L., Zinkhan, G. M., & Watson, R. T. (2006). The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H. (2014). Measuring software screen complexity: Relating eye tracking, emotional valence, and subjective ratings. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30(7), 518–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassberger, P. (1991). Information and complexity measures in dynamical systems. In Information dynamics (pp. 15–33). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(06), 803–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbluk, J. L., Noy, Y. I., Trbovich, P. L., & Eizenman, M. (2007). An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: Impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(2), 372–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S., Michailidou, E., & Stevens, R. (2009). Toward a definition of visual complexity as an implicit measure of cognitive load. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 6(2), 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Monk, A. (2010). The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human–Computer Interaction, 25(3), 235–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaps, C., & Handel, S. (1999). Similarity and features of natural textures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylighen, F. (1999). The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution. In The evolution of complexity, (pp. 17–44). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Horberry, T., Anderson, J., Regan, M. A., Triggs, T. J., & Brown, J. (2006). Driver distraction: The effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(1), 185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrey, W. J., Wickens, C. D., & Consalus, K. P. (2006). Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(2), 67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivory, M. Y., Sinha, R. R., & Hearst, M. A. (2001, March). Empirically validated web page design metrics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 53–60). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., Kaplan, R., & Wendt, J. S. (1972). Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. Perception & Psychophysics, 12(4), 354–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., Lim, J. H., Jo, C. I., & Kim, K. (2015). Utilization of visual information perception characteristics to improve classification accuracy of driver’s visual search intention for intelligent vehicle. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(10), 717–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton, C. G. (1992). Life at the edge of chaos. Artificial Life II, 10, 41–91.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, C., Lopez, M., & Shehab, R. (2013). Complexity questionnaires of visual displays: A validation study of two information complexity questionnaires of visual displays. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(5), 391–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., & Li, Z. (2012). Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(6), 553–568. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 296–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailidou, E., Harper, S., & Bechhofer, S. (2008, September). Visual complexity and aesthetic perception of web pages. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication (pp. 215–224). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, A., Mack, M. L., Shrestha, M., & Peeper, A. (2004, August). Identifying the perceptual dimensions of visual complexity of scenes. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 101–106). Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology (vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pandir, M., & Knight, J. (2006). Homepage aesthetics: The search for preference factors and the challenges of subjectivity. Interacting with Computers, 18(6), 1351–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, K., & Gajos, K. Z. (2014, April). Quantifying visual preferences around the world. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 11–20). Toronto, Canada: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Reinecke, K., Yeh, T., Miratrix, L., Mardiko, R., Zhao, Y., Liu, J., & Gajos, K. Z. (2013, April). Predicting users’ first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2049–2058). Paris, France: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, D., & Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 386–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., & Nakano, L. (2007). Measuring visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagberg, F. (2001). Accident risk of car drivers during mobile telephone use. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 26(1), 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenkman, B. N., & Jönsson, F. U. (2000). Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(5), 367–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12(6), 462–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, A. N., Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Opwis, K. (2010). Symmetry and aesthetics in website design: It’s a man’s business. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1831–1837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, A. N., Bargas-Avila, J. A., Opwis, K., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2009). Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users’ experience, physiology, performance, and memory. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 67(9), 703–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, A. N., Presslaber, E. E., Stöcklin, M., Opwis, K., & Bargas-Avila, J. A. (2012). The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 70(11), 794–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullis, T. S. (1983). The formatting of alphanumeric displays: A review and analysis. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 25(6), 657–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, M. (1938). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71–88). London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, J. (2004). Measures of information complexity and the implications for automation design (No. DOT/FAA/AM-04/17). Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration, Civil Aeromedical Inst.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, J. (2007). Information complexity in air traffic control displays (pp. 797–806). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, J. (2008). Designing questionnaires for controlling and managing information complexity in visual displays (No. DOT/FAA/AM-08/18). Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration, Civil Aerospace Medical Inst.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, J., & Manning, C. A. (2005). Complexity and automation displays of air traffic control: Literature review and analysis (No. DOT/FAA/AM-05/4). Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration, Civil Aeromedical Inst.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. H., Lim, J., & Ji, Y. G. (2015a). Assessment model for perceived visual complexity of automotive instrument cluster. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. H., Lim, J. H., & Ji, Y. G. (2015b). Perceived visual complexity and visual search performance of automotive instrument cluster: A quantitative measurement study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(12), 890–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar