Effect of Loading Symbol of Online Video on Perception of Waiting Time

References

• Allan, L. G. (1979). The perception of time. Perception and Psychophysics, 26(5), 340–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrilli, A., Cherubini, P., Pavese, A., & Manfredini, S. (1997). The influence of affective factors on time perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 59 (6), 972–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleustein, C., Rothschild, D. B., Valen, A., Valatis, E., Schweitzer, L., & Jones, R. (2014). Wait times, patient satisfaction scores, and the perception of care. The American Journal of Managed Care, 20 (5), 393–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, R. (1990). Cognitive models of psychological time. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Branaghan, R. J., & Sanchez, C. A. (2009). Feedback preferences and impressions of waiting. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 51 (4), 528–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. (2014, August 28). 1 in 4 U.S. internet users watches online videos daily. Statista. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/chart/2627/internet-users-watching-online-video-every-day/
   Google Scholar
• Brutlag, J. (2009). Speed matters for Google web search. Google. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/t7qGN8
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. S., & Paradkar, P. (1995). Factors affecting user tolerance for voice mail message transmission delays. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7 (3), 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceaparu, I., Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Robinson, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2004). Determining causes and severity of end-user frustration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17 (3), 333–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chebat, J. C., & Filiatrault, P. (1993). The impact of waiting in line on consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 11 (2), 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conn, A. P. (1995). Time affordances: The time factor in diagnostic usability heuristics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 186–193), New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, J., & Munson, E. V. (2011). 40 years of searching for the best computer system response time. Interacting with Computers, 23 (5), 555–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pessemier, T., De Moor, K., Joseph, W., De Marez, L., & Martens, L. (2012). Quantifying subjective quality evaluations for mobile video watching in a semi-living lab context. Broadcasting, IEEE Transactions On, 58 (4), 580–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• eMarketer. (2015, April 16). US adults spend 5.5 hours with video content each day. Retrieved from https://www.emarketer.com/Article/US-Adults-Spend-55-Hours-with-Video-Content-Each-Day/1012362#sthash.4RDw7Swq.dpuf
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. R., Blommaert, F. J., & Midden, C. J. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of time delay. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (2), 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 45–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72 (3), 561–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., Amento, B., Kuznetsov, S., & Bell, R. (2007). Rethinking the progress bar. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (pp. 115–118), Newport, RI.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., Yeo, Z., & Hudson, S. E. (2010). Faster progress bars: Manipulating perceived duration with visual augmentations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1545–1548), Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, R. E., & Miller, G. W. (1976). Transfer of time judgments as a function of feedback. The American Journal of Psychology, 89 (2), 303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, W. H. (1978). A theoretical reconciliation of competing views of time perception. The American Journal of Psychology, 91 (3), 417–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Internet Live Stats. (2016). Internet Users. Retrieved from http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/
   Google Scholar
• Iwata, O. (1994). Basic studies on intolerance for waiting-stress. Journal of Human Sciences, Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, the University of Tokushima, 2, 27–34. (In Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Jacko, J. A., Sears, A., & Borella, M. S. (2000). The effect of network delay and media on user perceptions of web resources. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19 (6), 427–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P., & Peppiatt, E. (1996). Managing perceptions of waiting times in service queues. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7 (5), 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, K. L., Larson, B. M., & Larson, R. C. (1991). Prescription for the waiting-in-line blues: Entertain, enlighten, and engage. MIT Sloan Management Review, 32 (2), 44.
   Google Scholar
• Kishore, A. (2013). Why quality of experience is the most critical metric for internet video profitability. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/media-network/media-network-blog/2013/aug/07/internet-video-profitability-metric
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, S. S., & Sitaraman, R. K. (2013). Video stream quality impacts viewer behavior: Inferring causality using quasi-experimental designs. Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions On, 21 (6), 2001–2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejeune, H., & Wearden, J. H. (2009). Vierordt’s the experimental study of the time sense (1868) and its legacy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21 (6), 941–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liikkanen, L. A., & Gómez, P. G. (2013). Designing interactive systems for the experience of time. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 146–155), Tyne, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. C., Yeh, C. H., & Wei, C. C. (2013). How will the use of graphics affect visual aesthetics? A user-centered approach for web page design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71 (3), 217–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macar, F., Grondin, S., & Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation. Memory & Cognition, 22 (6), 673–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., Shinar, D., Bitan, Y., & Leiser, D. (1996). Duration estimates and users’ preferences in human-computer interaction. Ergonomics, 39 (1), 46–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, B. A. (1985). The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1985 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Francisco, California). CHI ‘85, New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Nah, F. F. H. (2004). A study on tolerable waiting time: How long are web users willing to wait? Behaviour & Information Technology, 23 (3), 153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niida, S., Uemura, S., & Ano, S. (2012). User study of the subjective quality of mobile streaming service. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services companion (pp. 83–88), San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Parush, A., Shwarts, Y., Shtub, A., & Chandra, M. J. (2005). The impact of visual layout factors on performance in Web pages: A cross-language study. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47 (1), 141–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruyn, A., & Smidts, A. (1998). Effects of waiting on the satisfaction with the service: Beyond objective time measures. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15 (4), 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. M., Evaristo, R., & Straub, D. (2003). Culture and consumer responses to web download time: A four-continent study of mono and polychronism. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50 (1), 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, A. M., Meyvis, T., Nelson, L. D., Converse, B. A., & Sackett, A. L. (2010). You’re having fun when time flies the hedonic consequences of subjective time progression. Psychological Science, 21 (1), 111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalom, N. (2008). Amazon found every 100 ms of latency cost them 1% in sales. GigaSpaces. Retrieved from https://blog.gigaspaces.com/amazon-found-every-100ms-of-latency-cost-them-1-in-sales/
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., Taub, D., & Hovland, C. I. (1958). Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55 (2), 150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Statista. (2016). Percentage of internet users who watch online video content on any device in 2014, by country. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/272835/share-of-internet-users-who-watch-online-videos/
   Google Scholar
• Syahrial, Y., Nik, K. N. M., Sri, M., Sambas, A. K., Risanty & Fadlian, S. (2012). The effects of waiting time, passive and active impatience on anger and waiting acceptability. American Journal of Economics, (Special Issue), 2(4),109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Szameitat, A. J., Rummel, J., Szameitat, D. P., & Sterr, A. (2009). Behavioral and emotional consequences of brief delays in human–computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67 (7), 561–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. A., & Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 17 (4), 363–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomaschke, R., & Haering, C. (2014). Predictivity of system delays shortens human response time. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72 (3), 358–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. A., Yarnold, P. R., Williams, D. R., & Adams, S. L. (1996). Effects of actual waiting time, perceived waiting time, information delivery, and expressive quality on patient satisfaction in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 28 (6), 657–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thum, M., Boucsein, W., Kuhmann, W., & Ray, W. J. (1995). Standardized task strain and system response times in human-computer interaction. Ergonomics, 38 (7), 1342–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tognazzini, B. (1993). Principles, techniques, and ethics of stage magic and their application to human interface design. In Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 355–362), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the” internal clock”. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 77 (13), 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei, X. D. (2010). Fast by default: To achieve sustainable high performance. Velocity China. Retrieved from http://davidwei.org/cv/talks/VelocityChina/VelocityChina2010Dec8Keynote.pdf
   Google Scholar
• YouTube. (2016). Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html
   Google Scholar
• Zakay, D. (1998). Attention allocation policy influences prospective timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5 (1), 114–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakay, D., & Tsal, Y. (1989). Awareness of attention allocation and time estimation accuracy. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27 (3), 209–210.
   Google Scholar