Factors Influencing the Adoption of Smart Wearable Devices

References

• Baber, C. (2001). Wearable computers: A human factors review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13(2), 123–145. doi:10.1207/S15327590IJHC1302_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, J. (2014). Google Glass is now banned from all US movie theaters. Business Insider. Retrieved from http:// businessinsider.com/movie-industry-bans-google-glass
   Google Scholar
• Billinghurst, M., & Starner, T. (1999). New ways to manage information. Computer, 32(1), 57–64. doi:10.1109/2.738305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, P. (2015). Unlock the full potential of wearables with organic TFTs. Information Display, 31(1), 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Lee, H., & Kim, D. (2012). The integrated model of smartphone adoption: Hedonic and utilitarian value perceptions of smartphones among Korean college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), 473–479. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., & Kim, S. (2016). Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 777–786. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah, S. H.-W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65(1), 276–284. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, S., & Hashizume, H. (2005). Perception of wearable computers for everyday life by the general public: Impact of culture and gender on technology. In L. T. Yang, M. Amamiya, Z. Liu, M. Guo, & F. J. Rammig (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 3824. Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing – EUC 2005 (pp. 826–835). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dvorak, J. L. (2008). Moving wearables into the mainstream: Taming the borg. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Feiner, S. (1999). The importance of being mobile: Some social consequences of wearable augmented reality systems. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (pp. 145–148). San Francisco, CA: IEEE. doi:10.1109/IWAR.1999.803815
   Google Scholar
• Gao, S., Krogstie, J., & Siau, K. (2011). Development of an instrument to measure the adoption of mobile services. Mobile Information Systems, 7(1), 45–67. doi:10.1155/2011/831018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., Krogstie, J., & Siau, K. (2014). Adoption of mobile information services: An empirical study. Mobile Information Systems, 10(2), 147–171. doi:10.1155/2014/146435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60–72. doi:10.2307/3203341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, D. W., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses and knowledge management: A conceptual framework for enterprise social networks. In A. Rossmann, G. Stei, & M. Besch (eds.) Enterprise social networks (pp. 83–109). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., Kim, S., & Choi, B. (2016). Consumer valuation of the wearables: The case of smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 899–905. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaciak, E., Cullen, C., & Sagan, A. (2010). The quality of ladders generated by abbreviated hard laddering. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 18(3/4), 156–166. doi:10.1057/jt.2010.20
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., & Shin, D. H. (2015). An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Research, 25(4), 527–541. doi:10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahapatra, R., Manzar, R., & Bhadauria, V. S. (2015). Adoption and use of open source infrastructure software by large corporations: The case of MySQL. Journal of Database Management, 26(4), 1–17. doi:10.4018/JDM
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S. (1997). Historical account of the ‘WearComp’ and ‘WearCam’ inventions developed for applications in ‘personal imaging’. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 66–73), Cambridge, MA: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ISWC.1997.629921
   Google Scholar
• Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, F., Zhou, J., & Yi, S. (2017). Adapting the navigation interface of smart watches to user movement. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 33(6), 460–474. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1279826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nah, F., Siau, K., & Sheng, H. (2005). The value of mobile applications: A utility company study. Communications of the ACM, 48(2), 85–90. doi:10.1145/1042091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ok, A. E., Basoglu, N. A., & Daim, T. (2015). Exploring the design factors of smart glasses. In Proceedings of the Portland international center for management of engineering and technology (pp. 1657–1664), Portland, OR: IEEE. doi:10.1109/PICMET.2015.7273236
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y., & Chen, J. (2007). Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(9), 1349–1365. doi:10.1108/02635570710834009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., Brem, A., & Ivens, B. S. (2015). Who will buy smart glasses? Empirical results of two pre-market-entry studies on the role of personality in individual awareness and intended adoption of Google Glass wearables. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 635–647. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., Hein, D. W. E., He, J., Ro, Y. K., Rawashdeh, S., & Krulikowski, B. (2016). Fashion or technology? A fashnology perspective on the perception and adoption of augmented reality smart glasses. Journal of Interactive Media, 15(2), 179–194.
   Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123–148. doi:10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.075690
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T. J., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 11–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheingans, F., Cikit, B., & Ernst, C. P. H. (2016). The potential influence of privacy risk on activity tracker usage: A study. In C. P. H. Ernst (ed.) The drivers of wearable device usage (pp. 25–35). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, B. J. (1997). Wearable remembrance agent: A system for augmented memory. Personal Technologies, 1(4), 218–224. doi:10.1007/BF01682024
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. J. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segura Anaya, L. H., Alsadoon, A., Costadopoulos, N., & Prasad, P. W. C. (2017, February). Ethical implications of user perceptions of wearable devices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–28. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9872-8
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., Nah, F., Sharma, K., Katta, T., Pang, N., & Yong, A. (2016). Smart living for elderly: Design and human-computer interaction considerations. In J. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 9755. Human aspects of IT for the aged population: healthy and active aging (pp. 112–122). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, H., Nah, F., & Siau, K. (2005). Strategic implications of mobile technology: A case study using value-focused thinking. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 269–290. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, H., Nah, F., & Siau, K. (2008). An experimental study on ubiquitous commerce adoption: Impact of personalization and privacy concerns. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(6), 344–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, H., Siau, K., & Nah, F. (2010). Understanding the values of mobile technology in education: A value-focused thinking approach. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 41(2), 25–44. doi:10.1145/1795377.1795380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Nah, F. (2004). The value of mobile commerce to customers. In Proceedings of the third annual workshop on HCI research in MIS (pp. 65–69), Washington, DC: Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, E. (2014). 2014 will be the year of the wearable. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2013/11/02/2014-will-be-the-year-of-wearable-technology
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, V., Stewart, A., & Fonda, N. (1981). Business applications of repertory grid. London: McGraw-Hill Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, B., Dos Santos Ferreira, T. P., & Ernst, C. P. H. (2016). Does perceived health risk influence smartglasses usage? In C. P. H. Ernst (ed.) The drivers of wearable device usage (pp. 13–23). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, F. B., & Hunter, M. G. (2002). The repertory grid technique: A method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 39–57. doi:10.2307/4132340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiz, D., Anand, G., & Ernst, C. P. H. (2016). The influence of subjective norm on the usage of smartglasses. In C.-P. H. Ernst (Ed.), The drivers of wearable device usage (pp. 1–11). London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar