How does Parallax Scrolling Influence User Experience? A Test of TIME (Theory of Interactive Media Effects)

References

• Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 665–694. doi:10.2307/3250951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, B., & Darwell, B. (2015). 2015 year in review. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2015/12/2015-year-in-review/
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. T., & Lin, T. W. (2012). How a 3d tour itinerary promotion affect consumers’ intention to purchase a tour product? Information Technology Journal, 11(10), 1357. doi:10.3923/itj.2012.1357.1368
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V., & Thompson, S. C. (1988). The vividness effect: Elusive or illusory? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(88)90041-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65–77. doi:10.1080/00913367.2001.10673646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debbabi, S., Daassi, M., & Baile, S. (2010). Effect of online 3D advertising on consumer responses: The mediating role of telepresence. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(9–10), 967–992. doi:10.1080/02672570903498819
   Google Scholar
• Dou, X., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Power of the swipe: Why mobile websites should add horizontal swiping to tapping, clicking, and scrolling interaction techniques. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(4), 352–362. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1147902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, D., Mohler, J., Vorvoreanu, M., & Glotzbach, R. (2015). The effects of parallax scrolling on user experience in web design. Journal of Usability Studies, 10(2), 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97. doi:10.1080/01449290500330331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, H., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). Big Data or Small Stories? Exemplification and Interactivity Effects on Shaping Perception and Attitude of Social Issues. Paper presented at the 65th annual conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), San Juan, PR.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S. X. Q., Tsang, S. N. H., Chan, A. H. S., & Liu, S. L. (2017). Hand- and foot-controlled dual-tracking task performance together with a discrete spatial stimulus-response compatibility task. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 33, 21–34. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1232226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. H., Fiore, A. M., & Kim, J. (2006). The role of the technology acceptance model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology on consumer responses. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(8), 621–644. doi:10.1108/09590550610675949
   Google Scholar
• Limperos, A., Waddell, T. F., Ivory, A. H., & Ivory, J. D. (2014). Psychological and physiological responses to stereoscopic 3D presentation in handheld digital gaming: Comparing the experiences of frequent and infrequent game players. Presence, 23(4), 341–353. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00204
   Google Scholar
• Macho, S., & Ledermann, T. (2011). Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: The phantom model approach. Psychological Methods, 16(1), 34–43. doi:10.1037/a0021763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsunaga, M. (2008). Item parceling in structural equation modeling: A primer. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(4), 260–293. doi:10.1080/19312450802458935
   Google Scholar
• Mediacollege.com. (2017). What is 3D? Retrieved from http://www.mediacollege.com/3d/intro.html
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. doi:10.1145/301153.301168
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 938–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., Robinson, H. R., & Lee, J. Y. (2013). Page flipping vs. clicking: The impact of naturally mapped interaction technique on user learning and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1334–1341. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). User engagement with interactive media: A communication perspective. In O’Brien & P. Cairns (Eds.),Why engagement matters: Cross-disciplinary perspectives of user engagement in digital media (pp. 177–198). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Delia, J. G. (1981). Construct differentiation and the relationship of attitudes and behavioral intentions. Communications Monographs, 48(2), 146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2016). Principles for designing interfaces compatible with human information processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32, 2–22. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1105009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, J. C., & Bohr, I. (2014). User experience while viewing stereoscopic 3D television. Ergonomics, 57(8), 1140–1153. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.914581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (2000). Perceptual user interface: Perceptual bandwidth. Communications of the ACM, 43(3), 65–70. doi:10.1145/330534.330542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D. (1984). Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models. Psychometrika, 49(1), 37–47. doi:10.1007/BF02294204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Z. (2014). The hypnotic effect of parallax scrolling and how it impacts user experience. Retrieved from http://uxmag.com/articles/the-hypnotic-effect-of-parallax-scrolling-and-how-it-impacts-user-experience
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, R. (2011). Behind the scenes of Nike better world. Retrieved from http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/07/12/behind-the-scenes-of-nike-better-world/
   Google Scholar
• Skalski, P., Tamborini, R., Shelton, A., Buncher, M., & Lindmark, P. (2011). Mapping the road to fun: Natural video game controllers, presence, and game enjoyment. New Media & Society, 13(2), 224–242. doi:10.1177/1461444810370949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2007). Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 89–104). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 72–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Retrieved from http://mitpress2.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262294230chap4. pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., & Jia, H. (2011). Calls for interaction: the more the better? User experience of 3D carousel and additional interaction techniques. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2011 (pp. 487–490). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1080/07370024.2013.789347
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Xu, Q., & Jia, H. (2014). User experience of on-screen interaction techniques: An experimental investigation of clicking, sliding, zooming, hovering, dragging, and flipping. Human–Computer Interaction, 29(2), 109–152. doi:10.1080/07370024.2013.789347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Jia, H., Waddell, T. F., & Huang, Y. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME): Four models for explaining how interface features affect user psychology. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 47–86). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating web site interactivity: Impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication research, 30(1), 30–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Tamul, D. J., & Wu, M. (2014). Capturing “cool”: Measures for assessing coolness of technological products. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(2), 169–180. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A., Thew, S., De Bruijn, O., Buchan, I., Jarvis, P., McNaught, J., & Procter, R. (2010). User engagement by user-centred design in e-Health. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926),4209–4224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visinescu, L. L., Sidorova, A., Jones, M. C., & Prybutok, V. R. (2015). The influence of website dimensionality on customer experiences, perceptions and behavioral intentions: an exploration of 2D vs. 3D web design. Information & Management, 52(1), 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. N., & Shyu, F. M. (2014). Study on parallax scrolling web page conversion module. In J. S. Pan, et al. (Eds.), Intelligent data analysis and its applications, Volume I. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, (pp. 235–243). Cham, Switzerland: Springer doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07776-5_25
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Q., & Sundar, S. S. (2014). Lights, camera, music, interaction! Interactive persuasion in e-commerce. Communication Research, 41(2), 282–308. doi:10.1177/0093650212439062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar