Using Distributable User Interfaces in CSCL In-Situ Classrooms

References

• Bandelloni, R., Mori, G., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., & Scorcia, A. (2007). Web user interface migration through different modalities with dynamic device discovery. Second International Workshop on Adaptation and Evolution in Web Systems Engineering, (págs. 58-72).
   Google Scholar
• Bourimi, M., Barth, T., Kesdogan, D., Abou-Tair, D., Hermann, F., & Thiel, S. ( 11 de 2012). Using distributed user interfaces in collaborative, secure, and privacy-preserving software environments. (R. Tesoriero, & M. D. Lozano, Edits.) International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(11), 748–753. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.715541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratt, C. (2008). The Jigsaw classroom under test: No effect on intergroup relations evident. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18(5), 403–419. doi:10.1002/casp.v18:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In Patrick W. Jordan, B. Thomas, Ian Lyall McClelland, Bernard Weerdmeester (Eds.).Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189–194. London, UK: CRC Press
   Google Scholar
• Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Thevenin, D., Limbourg, Q., Bouillon, L., & Vanderdonckt, J. (2003). A unifying reference framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 15(3), 289–308. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00010-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eclipse Foundation. ( 17 de 1 de 2017a). ACCELEO. (Orbeo) Recuperado el 17 de 1 de 2017, de ACCELEO: https://eclipse.org/acceleo/
   Google Scholar
• Eclipse Foundation. ( 17 de 1 de 2017b). OclInEcore. (Eclipse Foundation) Recuperado el 17 de 1 de 2017, de OclInEcore: https://wiki.eclipse.org/OCL/OCLinEcore
   Google Scholar
• Eclipse Foundation. ( 17 de 1 de 2017c). The Atlas transformation language. (Eclipse Foundation) Recuperado el 17 de 1 de 2017, de The Atlas transformation language: https://eclipse.org/atl/
   Google Scholar
• Eclipse Foundation . (2017 de 1 de2017d). The graphical modeling project. ( Eclipse Foundation) Recuperado el 2017 de 1 de 2017, de The graphical modeling project: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/gmp/
   Google Scholar
• Fardoun, H. M., López, S. R., & Villanueva, P. (2011). Improving e-learning using distributed user interfaces. In J. A. Gallud, R. Tesoriero, & V. M. Penichet ((Edits.)), Distributed User Interfaces (pp. págs. 75-85). (Human Computer Interaction Series ed. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fardoun, H. M., Villanueva, P. G., Garrido, J., Rivera, G. S., & Lopez, S. R. (2010). Instructional m-learning system design based on learners: MPrinceTool. Fifth International Multi-conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (págs. 220-225). Valencia: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, R. T. (2000). Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures. En R. T. Fielding, PhD. Tesis. Representational State Transfer (REST). Irvine, CA, USA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Fondement, F., & Baar, T. (2005). Making metamodels aware of concrete syntax. In A. Hartman & D. Kreische ((Ed.)), Model Driven Architecture – Foundations and Applications. European Conference on Model Driven Architecture - Foundations and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3748 (pp. págs. 190-204). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiani, G., Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2011). User interface migration based on the use of logical descriptions. In F. Partenò ((Ed.)), Human-Computer Interaction Series, Migratory interactive applications for ubiquitous environments (pp. págs. 45-59). London, UK: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Grolaux, D., Vanderdonckt, J., & Van Roy, P. (2005). Attach Me, Detach Me, Assemble Me Like You Work. In M. F. Costabile & F. Paternò (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3585 (pp. págs. 198-212). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC. (2006). ISO25062 - Software Engineering – Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – Common Industry Format (CIF) for usability test reports standard. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lage, M., Platt, G., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar, J., Fend, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2009). Research Methods In Human-Computer Interaction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Meixner, G., Calvary, G., & Coutaz, J. (2014). Introduction to model-based user interfaces. (G. Meixner, G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, Editores, G. Meixner, G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, Productores, & W3C) Recuperado el 2017, de W3C: https://www.w3.org/TR/mbui-intro/
   Google Scholar
• Melchior, J., Vanderdonckt, J., & Van Roy, P. (2011). Distribution primitives for distributed user interfaces. In J. A. Gallud, R. Tesoriero, & V. M. Penichet ((Edits.)), Distributed User Interfaces: Designing Interfaces for the Distributed Ecosystem (pp. (págs. 23-31)). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, S.. J., Kendall, S., Uhl, A., & Dirk Weise, D (2004). MDA Distilled, Principles of Model Driven Architecture. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability. ACM INTERCHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (págs. 206-2013). Amsterdam, Netherlands: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Object Management Group. ( 2 de 2014). OMG Web Site. Recuperado el 17 de 1 de 2017, de Object Constraint Language (OCL): http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.4
   Google Scholar
• Paternò, F., Santoro, C., & Scorcia, A. (2009). Ambient intelligence for supporting task continuity across multiple devices and implementation languages. Computer Journal, 53(8), 1210–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrasch, R. (2007). Model based user interface design: Model driven architecture and HCI patterns. Softwaretechnik-Trends, 27(3), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sottet, J.-S., Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Favre, J.-M., Vanderdonckt, J., Stanciulescu, A., & Lepreux, S. (2007). A language perspective on the development of plastic multimodal user interfaces. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 1(2), 1–12. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sottet, J.-S., Calvary, G., Favre, J.-M., & Coutaz, J. (2009). Megamodeling and metamodel-driven engineering for plastic user interfaces: MEGA-UI. In En human-centered software engineering: Software engineering models, patterns and architectures for HCI (pp. págs. 173-200)). London, UK: Springer London.
   Google Scholar
• Terrenghi, L., Quigley, A., & Dix, A. (2009). A taxonomy for and analysis of multi-person-display ecosystems. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 13(8), 583–598. Springer-Verlag, London.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesoriero, R. (2014). Distributing user interfaces. 4th Distributed User Interfaces Workshop in the International Conference on Web Engineering - ICWE 2014 (págs. 1-10). Toulouse: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Tesoriero, R., Fardoun, H., Gallud, J. A., Lozano, M., & Penichet, V. (2009). Interactive learning panels. In J. A. Jacko ((Ed.)), 13th international conference on human-computer interaction. Part IV: Interacting in various application domains. 5613 (pp. págs. 236-245). San Diego, CA, USA: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tesoriero, R., & Lozano, M. ( 11 de 2012). Distributed User Interfaces: Applications and challenges. (R. Tesoriero, & M. Lozano, Edits.) International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(11), 967–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderdonckt, J. (2010). Distributed user interfaces: How to distribute user interface elements across users, platforms, and environments. XI Interacción 2010 (pp. (págs. 20-32)). Valencia, Spain: UCLM.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderdonckt, J., & Bodart, F. (1993). Encapsulating knowledge for intelligent automatic interaction objects selection. ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (págs. 424-429). ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelpen, C., Vanderhulst, G., Luyten, K., & Coninx, K. (2005). Light-Weight distributed web interfaces: preparing the web for heterogeneous environments. In D. Lowe & M. Gaedke (Ed.), International Conference on Web Engineering 2005 (pp. (págs. 197-202)). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva, P. G. (2014). PhD Thesis. Distributable user interfaces. Albacete, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain: UCLM.
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva, P. G., Tesoriero, R., & Gallud, J. A. (2010). Multi-pointer and collaborative system for mobile devices. 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (págs. 435-438). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva, P. G., Tesoriero, R., & Gallud, J. A. (2013). Revisiting the concept of distributed user interfaces. In M. D. Lozano, J. A. Gallud, R. Tesoriero, & V. M. Penichet ((Edits.).), Distributed user interfaces: Usability and collaboration (Vol. 2013). Springer. (Human Computer Interaction Series ed.
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva, P. G., Tesoriero, R., & Lozano, M. D. ( 11 de 2012). Collaborative Map Exploration Using Multitouch Surfaces. (R. Tesoriero, & M. D. Lozano, Edits.) International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(11), 754–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar