2,626
Views
67
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Do Individual Characteristics Influence the Types of Technostress Reported by Workers?

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361–391. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
  • Ahmad, U. N. U., Amin, S. M., & Wan Ismail, W. K. (2014). Moderating effect of technostress inhibitors on the relationship between technostress creators and organisational commitment. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 67(1), 51–62. doi:10.11113/jt.v67.1932
  • Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831–858. doi:10.1093/bja/aeq366
  • Baarspul, H. C., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2011). Do employees behave differently in public- vs private-sector organizations?: A state-of-the-art review. Public Management Review, 13(7), 967–1002. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589614
  • Baltaci, S., & Gokcay, D. (2016). Stress detection in human–computer interaction: Fusion of pupil dilation and facial temperature features. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(12), 956–966. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1220069
  • Barnett, J. H., & Karson, M. J. (1989). Managers, values, and executive decisions: An exploration of the role of gender, career stage, organizational level, function, and the importance of ethics, relationships and results in managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(10), 747–771. doi:10.1007/BF00383775
  • Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Brooks, S., & Califf, C. (2017). Social media-induced technostress: Its impact on the job performance of it professionals and the moderating role of job characteristics. Computer Networks, 114, 143–153. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2016.08.020
  • Burton-Jones, A., & Hubona, G. S. (2005). Individual differences and usage behavior: Revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. ACM SIGMIS Database, 36(2), 58–77. doi:10.1145/1066149.1066155
  • Chua, S. L., Chen, D. T., & Wong, A. F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 609–623. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00039-4
  • Coffin, R. J., & Macintyre, P. D. (1999). Motivational influences on computer-related affective states. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15(5), 549–569. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00036-9
  • Çoklar, A. N., & Şahin, Y. L. (2011). Technostress levels of social network users based on ICTs in Turkey. European Journal of Social Science, 23(2), 171–182.
  • Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 320–334. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x
  • Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (1993). Stress reactions to computer‐interactive tasks as a function of task structure and individual differences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 5(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/10447319309526053
  • De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., & Debreceny, R. S. (2013). COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities. Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 307–324. doi:10.2308/isys-50422
  • Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., Pallud, J., & Kalika, M. (2011). The influence of individual, contextual, and social factors on perceived behavioral control of information technology: A field theory approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 201–234. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222280306
  • Fletcher, J. K. (2001). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
  • Fuglseth, A. M., & Sørebø, Ø. (2014). The effects of technostress within the context of employee use of ICT. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 161–170. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.040
  • Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 642–655. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.642
  • Garicano, L., & Heaton, P. (2010). Information technology, organization, and productivity in the public sector: Evidence from police departments. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(1), 167–201. doi:10.1086/649844
  • Hair, J. F., Babin, B., Money, A., & Samouel, P. (2005). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman Companhia Ed.
  • He, J., & Freeman, L. A. (2010). Are men more technology-oriented than women? The role of gender on the development of general computer self-efficacy of college students. Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 21(2), 203–213.
  • Heinrich, K. T. (1991). Loving partnerships. The Journal of Higher Education, 62(5), 514–538. doi:10.1080/00221546.1991.11774150
  • Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. doi:10.1080/01411920902989227
  • Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576
  • Hsiao, K. L. (2017). Compulsive mobile application usage and technostress: The role of personality traits. Online Information Review, 41(2), 272–295. doi:10.1108/OIR-03-2016-0091
  • Hsiao, K. L., Shu, Y., & Huang, T. C. (2017). Exploring the effect of compulsive social app usage on technostress and academic performance: Perspectives from personality traits. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 679–690. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.001
  • Huffman, A. H., Whetten, J., & Huffman, W. H. (2013). Using technology in higher education: The influence of gender roles on technology self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1779–1786. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.012
  • Hung, W. H., Chen, K., & Lin, C. P. (2014). Does the proactive personality mitigate the adverse effect of technostress on productivity in the mobile environment? Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 143–157. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2014.06.002
  • Jena, R. K. (2015). Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: An empirical study among Indian academician. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1116–1123. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.020
  • Jena, R. K., & Mahanti, P. K. (2014). An Empirical study of Technostress among Indian Academicians. International Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 1–10. doi:10.14257/ijel.2014.3.2.01
  • Joiner, R., Gavin, J., Brosnan, M., Cromby, J., Gregory, H., Guiller, J., … Moon, A. (2013). Comparing first and second generation digital natives’ internet use, internet anxiety, and internet identification. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(7), 549–552. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0526
  • Joreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of American Statistical Association, 70(351), 631–639.
  • Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331491
  • Korobili, S., Togia, A., & Malliari, A. (2010). Computer anxiety and attitudes among undergraduate students in Greece. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 399–405. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.011
  • Krishnan, S. (2017). Personality and espoused cultural differences in technostress creators. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 154–167. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.039
  • Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340. doi:10.5465/AMR.1998.533229
  • Laumer, S., Maier, C., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2016). User personality and resistance to mandatory information systems in organizations: A theoretical model and empirical test of dispositional resistance to change. Journal of Information Technology, 31(1), 67–82. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.17
  • Lee, S. B., Lee, S. C., & Suh, Y. H. (2016). Technostress from mobile communication and its impact on quality of life and productivity. Total Quality Management, 27(7), 775–790. doi:10.1080/14783363.2016.1187998
  • Maier, C. (2012). Personality within information systems research: A literature analysis. Ecis, 101. Retrieved from http://home.aisnet.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=346
  • Maier, C. (2014). Technostress. Retrieved from https://d-nb.info/1066645345/34
  • Maier, C., Laumer, S., & Eckhardt, A. (2015). Information technology as daily stressor: Pinning down the causes of burnout. Journal of Business Economics, 85(4), 349–387. doi:10.1007/s11573-014-0759-8
  • Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2015). Giving too much social support: Social overload on social networking sites. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(5), 447–464. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.3
  • Maier, C., Laumer, S., Weinert, C., & Weitzel, T. (2015). The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: A study of Facebook use. Information Systems Journal, 25(3), 275–308. doi:10.1111/isj.12068
  • Marôco, J. (2014). Análise de equações estruturais: fundamentos teóricos, software & aplicações. Lisboa, Portugal: ReportNumber.
  • Mikkelsen, A., Øgaard, T., Lindøe, P. H., & Olsen, O. E. (2002). Job characteristics and computer anxiety in the production industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(3), 223–239. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00051-6
  • Morris, M. G., Venkatesh, V., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 69–84. doi:10.1109/TEM.2004.839967
  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). How broadly does education contribute to job performance? Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 89–134. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01130.x
  • Parayitam, S., Desai, K. J., Desai, M. S., & Eason, M. K. (2010). Computer attitude as a moderator in the relationship between computer anxiety, satisfaction, and stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 345–352. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.005
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
  • Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0165
  • Rainey, H. G., & Chun, Y. H. (2007). Public and private management compared. The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199226443.003.0005
  • Riedl, R. (2012). On the biology of technostress: Literature review and research agenda. SIGMIS Database, 44(1), 18–55. doi:10.1145/2436239.2436242
  • Roberson, Q., Ryan, A. M., & Ragins, B. R. (2017). The evolution and future of diversity at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 483–499. doi:10.1037/apl0000161
  • Şahin, Y. L., & Çoklar, A. N. (2009). Social networking users’ views on technology and the determination of technostress levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1437–1442. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.253
  • Saleem, H., Beaudry, A., & Croteau, A. M. (2011). Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1922–1936. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.017
  • Schwark, J. D., Dolgov, I., Hor, D., & Graves, W. (2013). Gender and personality trait measures impact degree of affect change in a hedonic computing paradigm. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(5), 327–337. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.711703
  • Scott, J. E., & Walczak, S. (2009). Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: Assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance. Information and Management, 46(4), 221–232. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.10.003
  • Sellberg, C., & Susi, T. (2014). Technostress in the office: A distributed cognition perspective on human-technology interaction. Cognition, Technology and Work, 16(2), 187–201. doi:10.1007/s10111-013-0256-9
  • Simon, F., & Usunier, J. C. (2007). Cognitive, demographic, and situational determinants of service customer preference for personnel-in-contact over self-service technology. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(2), 163–173. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.11.004
  • Suh, A., & Lee, J. (2017). Understanding teleworkers’ technostress and its influence on job satisfaction. Internet Research, 27(1), 140–159. doi:10.1108/IntR-06-2015-0181
  • Tams, S., Hill, K., & Thatcher, J. (2014). Journal of the association for information neuroIS — Alternative or complement to existing methods? Illustrating the holistic effects of neuroscience and self-reported data in the context of technostress research neuroIS — alternative or complement to ex. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(October 2014), 723–753.
  • Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
  • Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2010). Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(3), 303–334. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222270311
  • Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2011). Crossing to the dark side. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113. doi:10.1145/1995376.1995403
  • Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
  • Venkatesh, V., Hall, M., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., Walton, S. M., & Morris, M. G. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
  • Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115. doi:10.2307/3250981
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb02627.x
  • Wahn, J. (2003). Sex differences in competitive and compliant unethical work behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(1), 121–128. doi:10.1023/A:1025039105839
  • Wang, K., Shu, Q., & Tu, Q. (2008). Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 3002–3013. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007
  • Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1997). Technostress: Coping with technology@ work@ home@ play. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations : A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.
  • Yan, Z., Guo, X., Lee, M. K. O., & Vogel, D. R. (2013). A conceptual model of technology features and technostress in telemedicine communication. Information Technology & People, 26(3), 283–297. doi:10.1108/ITP-04-2013-0071
  • Yeo, R. K., & Gold, J. (2015). More than meets the eye: Working around technology in cross-boundary work contexts. Information Technology & People, 28(3), 623–652. doi:10.1108/ITP-05-2013-0091
  • Young, J. P. (2000). Boy talk: Critical literacy and masculinities. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 312–337. doi:10.1598/Rrq.35.3.1
  • Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 362–375. doi:10.1177/009207002236911
  • Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (1999). Generations at work : Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, xers, and nexters in your workplace. AMACOM. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1407588
  • Zhou, J., Chourasia, A., & Vanderheiden, G. (2017). Interface adaptation to novice older adults’ mental models through concrete metaphors. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(7), 592–606. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1265827

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.