Social Game Elements in World of Warcraft: Interpersonal Relations, Groups, and Organizations for Gamification Design

References

• Anderson, I., Maitland, J., Sherwood, S., Barkhuus, L., Chalmers, M., Hall, M., … Muller, H. (2007). Shakra: Tracking and sharing daily activity levels with unaugmented mobile phones. Mobile Networks and Applications, 12(2–3), 185–199. doi:10.1007/s11036-007-0011-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, K., Carter, M., & Woodford, D. (2013, August). Constructing the ideal EVE online player. Proceedings of the 2013 Digital Games Research Association Conference (DIGRA ’13). Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/paper_1721.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in second life: an anthropologist explores the virtual human. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2011, May 3). Persuasive games: Exploitationware. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/134735/persuasive_games_exploitationware.php
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, M., Mattheiss, E., Orji, R., Marczewski, A., Hochleitner, W., Lankes, M., … Tscheligi, M. (2015, October). Personalization in serious and persuasive games and gamified interactions. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY ‘15) pp. (811–816). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Calleja, G. (2007). Digital games as designed experience: Reframing the concept of immersion. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://www.academia.edu/2962494/Digital_Games_as_Designed_Experience_Reframing_the_Concept_of_Immersion
   Google Scholar
• Cardano, M. (2009). Ethnography and reflexivity. notes on the construction of objectivity. Ethnographic Research, NetPaper del Dipartimento di scienze sociali, 1/2009.
   Google Scholar
• Castronova, E. (2005). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online worlds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. G. (2012). Leet noobs: The life and death of an expert player group in World of Warcraft. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Cockshut, T. L. (2012). The way we play: Exploring the specifics of formation, action and competition in digital gameplay among World of Warcraft raiders. Doctoral Thesis, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5931/
   Google Scholar
• Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., & Landay, J. A. (2006). Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. Proceedings of the CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems pp. (457–466). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J M, & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, J. P., Wehbe, R. R., Robb, J., & Nacke, L. E. (2013, October). Time’s up: Studying leaderboards for engaging punctual behaviour. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (Gamification ‘13) pp. (26–33). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, H., Goddijn, J., Wielinga, B., & Evers, V. (2010, March). Effects of (in)accurate empathy and situational valence on attitudes towards robots. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI ‘10) pp. (141–142). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Darejeh, A. (2016). Gamification solutions to enhance software user engagement - a systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(8), 613–642. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1183330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debeauvais, T., Nardi, B., Schiano, D. J., Ducheneaut, N., & Yee, N. (2011, June). If you build it they might stay: Retention mechanisms in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (FDG ‘11) pp. 180–187.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek ‘11) pp. (9–15). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2006, April). Implications for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘06) pp. (541–550). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., & Moore, R. J. (2007, April). The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in world of warcraft. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘07) pp. (839–848). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, L., & Johansson, M. (2013). Played and designed sociality in a massive multiplayer online game. Eludamos, 7(1), 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Eveleigh, A., Jennett, C., Lynn, S., & Cox, A. L. (2013, October). “I want to be a captain! I want to be a captain!”: Gamification in the old weather citizen science project. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (Gamification ‘13) pp. (79–82). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, T., Huang, E. M., Murphy, G. C., & Zimmermann, T. (2014, April). Persuasive technology in the real world: A study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. Proceedings of the CHI 2014 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems pp. (487–496). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Glas, R. (2007, September). Playing another game: Twinking in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of DiGRA 2007 Conference: Situated Play pp. (349–356). Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/07311.13119.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gobo, G. (2008). Re-conceptualizing generalization. Old issues in a new frame. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods (pp. 193–213). London, United Kingdom: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goehle, G. (2013). Gamification and web-based homework. Primus, 23, 234–246. doi:10.1080/10511970.2012.736451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Graepel, T., Herbrich, R., & Gold, J. (2004, November). Learning to fight. Proceedings of CGAIDE 2004 International Conference on Computer Games: Artificial Intelligence, Design and Education pp. (193–200).
   Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014, January). Does gamification work? – a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS ‘14) pp. (3025–3034). Washington: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hanus, M., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1982). The basic problems of phenomenology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hekler, E. B., Klasnja, P., Froehlich, J. E., & Buman, M. P. (2013, April). Mind the theoretical gap: Interpreting, Using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘13) pp. (3307–3316). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hinyard, L. J., & Kreuter, M. W. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior, 34(5), 777–792. doi:10.1177/1090198106291963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1968). Phänomenologische psychologie, husserliana IX [Phenomenological psychology. lectures from the summer semester]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (2013, April), Gamification: Moving from ‘addition’ to ‘creation’. Presented at the ACM CHI 2013 Workshop on Designing Gamification: Creating Gameful and Playful Experiences. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Jacobs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Juul, J. (2010). A casual revolution: Reinventing video games and their players. London, United Kingdom: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, N., Schulze, T., & Veit, D. (2011, August). More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing – A study on mechanical turk. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas conference on Information Systems, (AMCIS ‘11) pp. (1–11).
   Google Scholar
• Laschke, M., & Hassenzahl, M. (2011, May). Mayor or patron? The difference between a badge and a meaningful story. Presented at the ACM CHI 2013 Workshop on Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/18-Laschke.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., & Paiva, A. (2013). The influence of empathy in human-robot relations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(3), 250–260. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., & Strub, H. B. (2006, September), Fish’n’Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. Proceedings of the UbiComp 2006 Conference on Ubiquitous Computing Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, I. J., Gutwin, C., Mandryk, R. L., & Birk, M. (2014, February). How players value their characters in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW ’14) pp. (1333–1343). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lysloff, Rene T. A. (2003). Musical community on the internet: an on-line ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 18(2), 233-263. doi:10.1525/can.2003.18.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13, 522–525. doi:10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateas, M., & Stern, A. (2005, June). Structuring content in the Façade interactive drama architecture. Proceeding of the First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Pages pp. (93–98). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melenhorst, M., Novak, J., Micheel, I., Larson, M., & Boeckle, M. (2015, October). Bridging the utilitarian-hedonic divide in crowdsourcing applications. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Multimedia (CrowdMM ‘15) pp. (9–14). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, D., & Chen, S. (2006). Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology PTR.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1978). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Montola, M., Stenros, J., & Waern, A. (2009). Pervasive games: Theory and design. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F., & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100. doi:10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. (2010). My life as a night elf priest: An anthropological account of World of Warcraft. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A., & Harris, J. (2006, November). Strangers and friends: Collaborative play in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of the CSCW 2006 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work pp. (149–158). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A., Ly, S., & Harris, J. (2007, January). Learning conversations in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of the HICSS 2007 Conference on System Sciences pp. (79). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Orji, R., Mandryk, R. L., Vassileva, J., & Gerling, K. M. (2013, April). Tailoring persuasive health games to gamer type. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘13) pp. (2467–2476). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organizational Science, 11(5), 538–550. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.538.15204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, T., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2010, April). The rogue in the lovely black dress: Intimacy in world of warcraft. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10) pp. (233–242). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Aylett, R., Sobreperez, P., Woods, S., … Hall, L. (2004, July). Caring for agents and agents that care: Building empathic relations with synthetic agents. Proceedings of AAMAS 2004 (vol. 1) pp. (194–201). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, A. M. (2017). Exploring performance of gendered identities through language in World of Warcraft. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(3), 180–189. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1230965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 484–493. doi:10.1177/0146167294205005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, V. (2013). Challenges of implementing gamification for behavior change: Lessons learned from the design of blues buddies. Presented at the ACM CHI 2013 Workshop on Designing Gamification: Creating Gameful and Playful Experiences. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Rao.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. (2015). A qualitative investigation of gamification: Motivational factors in online gamified services and applications. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 11(1), 67–82. doi:10.4018/ijthi.2015010105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. (2017a). Designing interactive systems through a game lens: An ethnographic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 455–468. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. (2017b). Drawing inspiration from World of Warcraft: Gamification design elements for behavior change technologies. Interacting with Computers, Advanced articles. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwx001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. (2017c). From games to gamification: A classification of rewards in World of Warcraft for the design of gamified systems. Simulation & Gaming, 48(3), 381–401. doi:10.1177/1046878117697147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A., Cena, F., Hopfgartner, F., Hamari, J., & Linehan, C. (2016, October). Fictional game elements: Critical perspectives on gamification design. Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (CHI PLAY Companion ‘16) pp. (373–377). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, A., & Tirassa, M. (2017). Know Thyself: A theory of the self for personal informatics. Human-Computer Interaction. doi:10.1080/07370024.2017.1285704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. (2014, July). A SWOT analysis of the gamification practices: Challenges, open issues and future perspectives. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2014). In Y. Gu Ji & S. Choi (Eds.), Advances in affective and pleasurable design (pp. 476–487). Danvers, MA: AHFE Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, M. O., Thue, D., & Bulitko, V. (2011). Game AI as storytelling. In P. G. Calero (Ed.), Artificial intelligence for computer games (pp. 125–150). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, S., & Ryan, R. (2011). Glued to games: How video games draw us in and hold us spellbound. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. (2010). Can’t play, won’t play. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://kotaku.com/5686393/cantplay-wont-play/
   Google Scholar
• Rode, J. A. (2011, May). Reflexivity in digital anthropology. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11) pp. (123–132). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, M., Nakajima, T., & Alexandrova, T. (2012, October). Value-Based design for gamifying daily activities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC’12) pp. (421–424). Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schüll, N. D. (2014). Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepehr, S., & Head, M. (2013, October). Competition as an element of gamification for learning: An exploratory longitudinal investigation. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (Gamification ‘13) pp. (2–9). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G. (2016). A guild culture of ‘casual raiding’ enhances its members’ online gaming experiences: A cognitive anthropological and ethnographic approach to World of Warcraft. New Media & Society, Online First. doi:10.1177/1461444816644804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., Lacy, M. G., Dengah, H. J. F., Fagan, J., & Most, D. E. (2011). Magical flight and monstrous stress: Technologies of absorption and mental wellness in Azeroth. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 35(1), 26–62. doi:10.1007/s11013-010-9197-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanculescu, L. C., Bozzon, A., Sips, R.-J., & Houben, G.-J. (2016, February). Work and play: An experiment in enterprise gamification. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ’16) pp. (346–358). New York, NY : ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Stinson, J. N., Jibb, L. A., Nguyen, C., Nathan, P. C., Maloney, A. M., Dupuis, L. L., … Orr, M. (2013). Development and testing of a multidimensional iPhone pain assessment application for adolescents with cancer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e51. doi:10.2196/jmir.2350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundén, J. (2009, September). Play as transgression: An ethnographic approach to queer game cultures. Proceedings of DiGRA 2009 Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, September 1-4 2009, London. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/09287.40551.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L. (2006). Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tedlock, B. (1991). From participant observation to the observation of participation: The emergence of narrative ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47(1), 69–94. doi:10.1086/jar.47.1.3630581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terveen, L., & McDonald, D. W. (2005). Social matching: A framework and research agenda. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(3), 401–434. doi:10.1145/1096737
   Google Scholar
• Thurau, C., & Drachen, A. (2011, October) Naming virtual identities: patterns and inspirations for character names in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC’11) pp. (270–281). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Toscos, T., Faber, A., An, S., & Gandhi, M. (2006). Chick Clique: Persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise. CHI ‘06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘06) pp. (1873–1878). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from. Each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales from the field. On writing ethnography (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vesa, M. (2013) There be dragons! An ethnographic inquiry into the strategic practices and process of World of Warcraft gaming groups. Hanken school of economics, department of management and organisation, management and organisation. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/42056
   Google Scholar
• Vesa, M., Hamari, J., Harviainen, T., & Warmelink, H. (2017). Computer games and organization studies. Organization Studies, 38(2), 273–284. doi:10.1177/0170840616663242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, G. (1967). Towards a sociology of management. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Digital Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D., Ducheneaut, N., Xiong, L., Yee, N., & Nickell, E. (2006). From tree house to barracks the social life of guilds in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture, 1(4), 338–361. doi:10.1177/1555412006292616
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., & Kirschner, D. (2012). Coordinated action in the massively multiplayer online game World of Warcraft. Symbolic Interaction, 35(3), 340–367. doi:10.1002/symb.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, N. (2006). The demographics, motivations and derived experiences of users of massively-multiuser online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(2006), 309e329. doi:10.1162/pres.15.3.309
   Google Scholar
• Yee, N. (2007). Motivations of play in online games. Journal of CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9, 772–775. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772
   Google Scholar
• Yee, N., Ducheneaut, N., Nelson, L., & Likarish, P. (2011, May) Introverted elves & conscientious gnomes: The expression of personality in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘11) pp. (753–762). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, O., & Gal-Oz, A. (2014). Deconstructing gamification: Evaluating the effectiveness of continuous measurement, virtual rewards, and social comparison for promoting physical activity. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(7), 1705–1719. doi:10.1007/s00779-014-0783-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar