How Social Network Site Users’ Motives Predict Their Online Network Sizes: A Quantile Regression Approach to Japanese Twitter Usage

References

• Backstrom, L., Bakshy, E., Kleinberg, J. M., Lento, T. M., & Rosenn, I. (2011). Center of attention: How Facebook users allocate attention across friends. Proceedings of ICWSM-11 (pp. 34–41). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI.
   Google Scholar
• Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Plume Editors.
   Google Scholar
• Boase, J., & Ling, R. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 508–519. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 571–580). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M., Wu, X., Hao, Y., Xi, R., & Jin, T. (2012). Microblogging, online expression, and political efficacy among young Chinese citizens: The moderating role of information and entertainment needs in the use of Weibo. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(7), 345–349. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6(3), 170–175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. V., Widjaja, A. E., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Need for affiliation, need for popularity, self-esteem, and the moderating effect of big five personality traits affecting individuals’ self-disclosure on Facebook. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(11), 815–831. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1067479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. doi:10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., & Boyd, D. M. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. doi:10.1177/1461444810385389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Gummadi, K. P., & Schölkopf, B. (2014). Quantifying information overload in social media and its impact on social contagions. Proceedings of the ICWSM-14 (pp. 170–179). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, C. F., & Ferguson, D. A. (2011). Following local television news personalities on Twitter: A uses and gratifications approach to social networking. Electronic News, 5(3), 145–157. doi:10.1177/1931243111420405
   Google Scholar
• Hao, L., & Naiman, D. Q. (2007). Quantile regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53–72. doi:10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodas, N. O., Kooti, F., & Lerman, K. (2013). Friendship paradox redux: Your friends are more interesting than you. Proceedings of Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 2013 (pp. 8–10). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, M., & Aubert, V. (2013). Perceived bridging and bonding social capital on Twitter: Differentiating between followers and followees. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2134–2142. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopcroft, J., Lou, T., & Tang, J. (2011). Who will follow you back? Reciprocal relationship prediction. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 1137–1146). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ishiguro, I. (2016). Extroversion and neuroticism affect the right side of the distribution of network size. Social Networks, 44, 219–225. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii, K. (2008). Uses and gratifications of online communities in Japan. Observatorio (OBS*), 2(3). Retrieved July 12, 2014, from http://www.obs.obercom.pt/index.php/obs/article/view/176/179
   Google Scholar
• Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proceedings of WebKDD/SNA-KDD ‘07 (pp. 56–65). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1348549.1348556
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Y. G., Hwangbo, H., Yi, J. S., Rau, P. P., Fang, X., & Ling, C. (2010). The influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11–12), 1100–1121. doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.516727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivran-Swaine, F., Govindan, P., & Naaman, M. (2011). The impact of network structure on breaking ties in online social networks: Unfollowing on twitter. Proceedings of CHI ‘11 (pp. 1101–1104). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979105
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Chun, H., & Moon, S. (2011). Fragile online relationship: A first look at unfollow dynamics in Twitter. Proceedings of CHI ‘11 (pp. 1091–1100). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979104
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of WWW ‘10 (pp. 591–600). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Moon, S., & Lee, W. (2012). More of a receiver than a giver: Why do people unfollow in Twitter? Proceedings of ICWSM-12 (pp. 499–502). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, B. C., Kim, S. H., Duket, T., Catalán, A., & Yi, J. S. (2015). Do people really experience information overload while reading online reviews? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(12), 959–973. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1072785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. Y., & Yang, H. L. (2014). Determinants of individuals’ self-disclosure and instant information sharing behavior in micro-blogging. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814528294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 331–339. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W., Jones, P. S., Mineyama, Y., & Zhang, X. E. (2002). Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 25(4), 295–306. doi:10.1002/nur.10041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Intention to continue using Facebook fan pages from the perspective of social capital theory. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(10), 565–570. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2008). A network theory of social capital. In D. Castiglione, J. W. Van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (pp. 50–69). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435–463. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.002251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyata, K., Wellman, B., Boase, J., & Ikeda, K. (2005). The mobile-izing Japanese: Connecting to the Internet by PC and webphone in Yamanashi. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 143–164). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mo, R., & Leung, L. (2015). Exploring the roles of narcissism, uses of, and gratifications from microblogs on affinity-seeking and social capital. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 152–162. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, R., Leung, L., Hao, Y., Wu, X., Xi, R., & Zhang, S. (2014). Examining the mediating roles of microblog use in the relationships between narcissism, social anxiety, and social capital. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 4(2), 58–75. doi:10.4018/ijcbpl.2014040105
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, D. (2013). Twitter: social communication in the twitter age. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Sharma, A., Gupta, P., & Lin, J. (2014). Information network or social network? The structure of the Twitter follow graph. Proceedings of WWW’14 Companion (pp. 493–498). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2567948.2576939
   Google Scholar
• Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C. H. (2010). Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. Proceedings of CSCW’10 (pp. 189–192). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1718918.1718953
   Google Scholar
• Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729–733. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 169–174. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0056
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, C., Köbler, F., Goswami, S., & Krcmar, H. (2013). Tweeting to feel connected: A model for social connectedness in online social networks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(10), 670–687. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.768137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. G., Dunbar, R. I., Pollet, T. V., & Kuppens, T. (2009). Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks, 31(2), 138–146. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 525–548). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki, Y., Kawai, D., & Kitamura, S. (2015). The anatomy of tweet overload: How number of tweets received, number of friends, and egocentric network density affect perceived information overload. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 853–861. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki, Y., Kawai, D., & Kitamura, S. (2016). Unfriend or ignore tweets?: A time series analysis on Japanese Twitter users suffering from information overload. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 914–922. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434–445. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Vitak, J. (2013). Online social network sites and the concept of social capital. In F. L. F. Lee, L. Leung, J. L. Qiu, & D. S. C. Chu (Eds.), Frontiers in new media research (pp. 115–131). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504–525. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531–549. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. (2006). On and off the ’net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593–628. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Q., Fang, B., He, W. J., & Hsieh, J. J. (2012). Can social capital be transferred cross the boundary of the real and virtual worlds? An empirical investigation of Twitter. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P. (2012). Information seeking through microblog questions: The impact of social capital and relationships. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–9. doi:10.1002/meet.14504901064
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Pentina, I. (2012). Motivations and usage patterns of Weibo. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 15(6), 312–317. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Leung, L. (2014). A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444813520477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; Predicting Facebook™ and offline popularity from sociability and self‐Esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(1), 1–34. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01429.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar