Influence of an Interactive e-Book on the Reading Comprehension of Different Ethnic Groups Using Indigenous Culture as Content

References

• Abilkhamitkyzy, R., Aimukhambet, Z. A., & Sarekenova, K. K. (2014). Organization of independent work of students on credit technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 274–278. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.403
   Google Scholar
• Afsharrad, M., & Benis, A. R. S. (2015). Differences between monolinguals and bilinguals/males and females in English reading comprehension and reading strategy use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Retrieved from. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13670050.2015.1037238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alptekin, C. (2006). Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading. System, 34(4), 494–508. doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–292). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 252–256. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Strømsø, H. I. (2013). Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple texts: The roles of word-level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation. Reading and Writing, 26(3), 321–348. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9371-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chihara, T. (1989). Background and culture as factors in EFL reading comprehension. Language Testing, 6(2), 143–151. doi:10.1177/026553228900600202
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., Chow, B. W., & Mcbride–Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievement across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 344–365. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choa, K. W., Altarriba, J., & Popiel, M. (2015). Mental juggling: When does multitasking impair reading comprehension? The Journal of General Psychology, 142(2), 90–105. doi:10.1080/00221309.2014.1003029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Wolters, C. A., York, M. J., Swanson, E., Kulesz, P. A., & Francis, D. J. (2015). Adolescents’ use of reading comprehension strategies: Differences related to reading proficiency, grade level, and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 81–95. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Taboada, A., & Coddington, C. S. (2007). Engagement practices for strategy learning in concept-oriented reading instruction. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 241–266). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, B. (2014). Are there gender differences in the cognitive components of adult reading comprehension? Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 69–79. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimgärtner, R. (2013). Reflections on a model of culturally influenced human-computer interaction to cover cultural contexts in HCI design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(4), 205–219. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.765761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer, B. D., Kinzer, C. K., Plass, J. L., Letourneau, S. M., Hoffman, D., Bromley, M., … Kornak, Y. (2014). Moved to learn: The effects of interactivity in a Kinect-based literacy game for beginning readers. Computers & Education, 74, 37–49. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, K. L., & Chen, C. C. (2015). How do we inspire children to learn with e-readers? Library Hi Tech, 33(4), 584–596. doi:10.1108/LHT-04-2015-0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamysz, K., & Wichrowski, M. (2014). A little goat builds the world – An interactive children story for tablets. Procedia Technology, 18, 104–112. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.11.021
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, C. P., Chiagouris, L., & Gopalakrishna, P. (2012). Some people just want to read: The roles of age, interactivity, and perceived usefulness of print in the consumption of digital information products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(1), 168–178. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Ko, H. W., Shing, M. L., Lu, I. C., & Ku, Y. M. (2010). Handbook of teaching reading comprehension strategies. Taipei, Taiwan: Taiwan’s Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education, 55(1), 24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung, S. H., Wu, C. J., Su, Y. F., & Hung, L. Y. (2013). Chinese reading literacy of remote junior high students: A study of Han and Atayal students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 44, 561–578.
   Google Scholar
• Kush, J. C., Watkins, M. W., & Brookhart, S. M. (2005). The temporal-interactive influence of reading achievement and reading attitude. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(1), 29–44. doi:10.1080/13803610500110141
   Google Scholar
• Leou, Y. M., & Huang, S. H. (2007). The impact of balanced reading instruction on students’ reading ability and reading motivation. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 52(1), 133–157.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. H., & Lai, S. F. (2012). The functions of cultural schemata in the Chinese reading comprehension and reading time of college students in Taiwan. Journal of International Education Research, 8(2), 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers’ reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 124–128. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., & Kear, D. J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 43(8), 626–639. doi:10.1598/RT.43.8.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchie, E., Keer, H. V., & Vandevelde, S. (2014). Development of the Text-Learning Strategies Inventory: Assessing and profiling learning from texts in fifth and sixth grade. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(6), 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, H. (2013). Multimodal children’s e-books help young learners in reading. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(6), 477–483. doi:10.1007/s10643-013-0575-8
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.), (2015). PIRLS 2016 assessment framework (2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez-Valdéz, E. R., Lovelle, J. M. C., Martínez, O. S., García-Díaz, V., Pablos, P. O. C., & Marín, E. M. (2011). Recommendation system based on user interaction data applied to intelligent electronic books. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1445–1449. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno, T. (2007). EyePrint: Using passive eye trace from reading to enhance document access and comprehension. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 23(1–2), 71–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. D., & Manning, B. H. (1992). Basal reader instruction: Effects of comprehension monitoring training on reading comprehension, strategy use and attitude. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(1), 29–38. doi:10.1080/19388079209558103
   Google Scholar
• Payne, T. W., & Lynn, R. (2011). Sex differences in second language comprehension. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 434–436. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2011). Interaction design - Beyond human-computer interaction. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, C. P., Daley, S., Louick, R., Leider, C. M., & Gardner, G. L. (2014). How motivation and engagement predict reading comprehension among native English–speaking and English–learning middle school students with disabilities in a remedial reading curriculum. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salim, A. R. (1998). Social and cognitive factors influencing the reading comprehension of Arab students learning Hebrew as a second language in Israel. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(3), 201–212. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00057
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. (2004). How including prior knowledge as a subject variable may change outcomes of learning research. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 159–183. doi:10.3102/00028312041001159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, D. J. H., & Bus, A. G. (2012). Interactive electronic storybooks for kindergartners to promote vocabulary growth. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(1), 36–55. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strien, J. L. H., Kammerer, Y., Gruwel, S. B., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 245–252. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutz, F., Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Relations among reading motivation, reading amount, and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Yen, Y. F. (2015). Development of a contextual decision-making game for improving students’ learning performance in a health education course. Computers & Education, 82, 179–190. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takashi, Y., Hwaryoung, S. J., Noel, J., Greg, P., & Casady, B. (2015). Gender differences in mouse and cursor movements. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(12), 911–921. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1072787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torff, B., & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in Mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(2), 379–383. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., & Bryant, D. P. (2001). Collaborative strategic reading as a means to enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading comprehension and content-area learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 66–74. doi:10.1177/074193250102200201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., & Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 407–423. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendy, L., & Tamara, B. (2015). The collaborative critique: An inspection method for expert evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(11), 843–859. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1067500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Xu, J., Xie, X. Q., & Gao, X. B. (2013). Construction and implementation of ‘classic reading’ innovation platform. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 20, 128–135. doi:10.1016/S1005-8885(13)60207-1
   Google Scholar
• Yousef, H., Karimi, L., & Janfeshan, K. (2014). The relationship between cultural background and reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(4), 707–714. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.4.707-714
   Google Scholar
• Zumbach, J., & Mohrazb, M. (2008). Cognitive load in hypermedia reading comprehension: Influence of text type and linearity. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 875–887. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar