The Relationships among Gender, Cognitive Styles, Learning Strategies, and Learning Performance in the Flipped Classroom

References

• Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Harbi, S. S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2016). The flipped classroom impact in grammar class on EFL Saudi secondary school students’ performances and attitudes. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 60. doi:10.5539/elt.v9n10p60
   Google Scholar
• Arockiam, L., & Selvaraj, J. C. (2013). User interface design for effective e-learning based on personality traits. International Journal of Computer Applications, 61, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Balan, P., Clark, M., & Restall, G. (2015). Preparing students for flipped or team-based learning methods. Education+ Training, 57(6), 639–657. doi:10.1108/ET-07-2014-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basal, A. (2015). The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day, Paper presented at the International Society for Technology in Education Conference, Eugene, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(90), 9–18. doi:10.1002/ace.16
   Google Scholar
• Bukoye, O. T., & Shegunshi, A. (2016). Impact of engaging teaching model (ETM) on students’ attendance. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1221191. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1221191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakula, S., & Sedleniece, M. (2013). Improvement of personalized e-learning model framework using principles of knowledge management. Paper presented at the WSEAS International Conference, Budapest, Hungary. Recent Advances in Computer Engineering Series.
   Google Scholar
• Chae, S. W., Lee, K. C., & Seo, Y. W. (2016). Exploring the effect of avatar trust on learners’ perceived participation intentions in an e-learning environment. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(5), 373–393. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1150643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. H. (2010). Web-based learning programs: Use by learners with various cognitive styles. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1028–1035. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). Gender differences in Taiwan university students’ attitudes toward web-based learning. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 645–654. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9974
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, S. C., Yang, S. J., & Hsiao, C. C. (2016). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1096–1112.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. Y., Huang, P.-R., Shih, Y.-C., & Chang, L.-P. (2016). Investigation of multiple human factors in personalized learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 119–141. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.825809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2004). Cognitive modeling of student learning in web-based instructional programs. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(3), 375–402. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1703_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. T. (2012). A study of learning effects on e-learning with interactive thematic video. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(3), 279–292. doi:10.2190/EC.47.3.c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, G. L., Donovan, D. A., & Chambers, T. G. (2016). Increasing the use of student-centered pedagogies from moderate to high improves student learning and attitudes about biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(1), ar3. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-03-0062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, K., & Mehlhorn, J. (2003). A cooperative poultry research project to enhance critical thinking, problem-solving and research skills. NACTA Journal, 47, 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Du, X., & Taylor, S. (2013). Flipped classroom in first year management accounting unit – a case study. In Proceedings of Electric Dreams. Paper presented at the Ascilite Conference, Sydney, Australasia. (pp. 252–256). Retrieved November 3, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171134/.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. E., & Observe, E. (1996). Effects of teaching approach on achievement of agricultural education students with varying learning styles. Journal of Agricultural Education, 37, 43–51. doi:10.5032/jae.1996.03043
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, K. P. (2012). 10 reasons to flip: A southern Minnesota school district flipped its math classrooms and raised achievement and student engagement. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20. doi:10.1177/003172171209400205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, M., Davies, J., & McNorton, M. (2004). Cognitive style and cross cultural differences in internet use and computer attitudes. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 7, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, D., Pietri, E. S., Anderson, G., Moyano-Camihort, K., & Graham, M. J. (2015). Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(4), ar36. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-02-0040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, L., & Stepanski, E. J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hederich Martínez, C., & Estaún I Ferrer, S. (2005). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de Independencia-Dependencia de Campo. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(4), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jump, L. (2013). ‘Flipping the classroom’: A theoretical and practical exploration. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 4, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, N. (2015). The comparison between regular and flipped classrooms for EFL Korean adult learners. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 41–72.
   Google Scholar
• King, C., & Piotrowski, C. (2015). E-learning and flipped instruction integration in business education—A proposed pedagogical model. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 16, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S., Holton, I. I. I., . E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–481. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. doi:10.1080/00220480009596759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Koubek, R. J. (2011). The impact of cognitive style on user preference based on usability and aesthetics for computer-based systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(11), 1083–1114. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.555320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W., & Svinicki, M. (2013). McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85.
   Google Scholar
• Moffett, J. (2015). Twelve tips for “flipping” the classroom. Medical Teacher, 37(4), 331–336. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.943710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Witkin, H. A. (1971). Group embedded figures test. Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Onyekuru, B. U. (2015). Field dependence-field independence cognitive style, gender, career choice and academic achievement of secondary school students in emohua local government area of rivers state. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(10), 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. A., Aris, B., Rosli, M. S., Mohamed, H., Abdullah, Z., & Mohd Zaid, N. (2015). Significance of preparedness in flipped classroom. Advanced Science Letters, 21(10), 3388–3390. doi:10.1166/asl.2015.6514
   Google Scholar
• Raptis, G. E., Fidas, C. A., & Avouris, N. M. (2016). Differences of field dependent/independent gamers on cultural heritage playing: Preliminary findings of an eye-tracking study. Paper presented at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Rittschof, K. A. (2010). Field dependence–independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: Implications for instructional systems design and research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 99–114. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9093-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, H., Kim, N., Lee, J., & Shin, D. (2016). An affordance-based model of human action selection in a human–machine interaction system with cognitive interpretations. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(5), 402–414. doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1157678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 344–360), London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
   Google Scholar
• Tekinarslan, E. (2009). Turkish university students’ perceptions of the World Wide Web as a learning tool: An investigation based on gender, socio-economic background, and web experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Thyagharajan, K., & Nayak, R. (2007). Adaptive content creation for personalized e-learning using web services. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(9), 828–836.
   Google Scholar
• Tinajero, C., Lemos, S. M., Araujo, M., Ferraces, M. J., & Paramo, M. F. (2012). Cognitive style and learning strategies as factors which affect academic achievement of Brazilian University Students. Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica, 25(1), 105–113. doi:10.1590/S0102-79722012000100013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. C. (2014). Seeing the forest and the trees: pictorial complexity, field dependence/independence, and english listening comprehension. English Teaching & Learning, 38(4), 125–151.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, W. S., & Yoo, S. A. (2015). Online group embedded figures test and student’s success in online course. Paper presented at the Conference Proceedings. The Future of Education.
   Google Scholar