Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review

References

• Aleven, V., Sewall, J., Popescu, O., Xhakaj, F., Chand, D., Baker, R., … Gasevic, D. (2015). The beginning of a beautiful friendship? Intelligent tutoring systems and MOOCs. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 525–528.
   Google Scholar
• Alharbi, A., Henskens, F., & Hannaford, M. (2012). A domain-based learning object search engine to support self-regulated learning. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 1(01), 2277–2764.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015, Accessed March, 10, 2015.). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 146–151. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition–Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 367–379. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bannert, M., & Reimann, P. (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 40(1), 193–211. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9167-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bannert, M., Sonnenberg, C., Mengelkamp, C., & Pieger, E. (2015). Short- and long-term effects of students’ self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 293–306. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, M. K. (2013). The landscape of K-12 online learning: Examining what is known. Handbook of Distance Education, 3, 574–593.
   Google Scholar
• *Biesinger, K., & Crippen, K. (2010). The effects of feedback protocol on self-regulated learning in a web-based worked example learning environment. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1470–1482. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International. Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457.
   Google Scholar
• Boot, W. R., Simons, D. J., Stothart, C., & Stutts, C. (2013). The pervasive problem with placebos in psychology why active control groups are not sufficient to rule out placebo effects. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4), 445–454. doi:10.1177/1745691613491271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chang, M. M. (2007). Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 187–196. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wu, K. T., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels. Computers & Education, 52(2), 283–291. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chun-Yi, S., & Hsiu-Chuan, L. (2011). Metacognitive skills development: A web-based approach in higher education. TOJET: the Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 140–150.
   Google Scholar
• *Chen, C. M., Wang, J. Y., & Chen, Y.-C. (2014). Facilitating English-language reading performance by a digital reading annotation system with self-regulated learning mechanisms. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 102–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chang, M. M., & Lin, M. C. (2014). The effect of reflective learning e-journals on reading comprehension and communication in language learning. Computers & Education, 71, 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chen, C. M., & Huang, S. H. (2014). Web‐based reading annotation system with an attention‐based self‐regulated learning mechanism for promoting reading performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 959–980. doi:10.1111/bjet.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human computer interaction (pp. 849–874). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1994). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253–278. doi:10.1007/BF01099821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Crippen, K. J., & Earl, B. L. (2007). The impact of web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 49(3), 809–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2016). Gauging MOOC learners’ adherence to the designed learning path. In Proceeding of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 54–61.
   Google Scholar
• *El Saadawi, G. M., Azevedo, R., Castine, M., Payne, V., Medvedeva, O., Tseytlin, E., … Crowley, R. S. (2010). Factors affecting feeling-of-knowing in a medical intelligent tutoring system: The role of immediate feedback as a metacognitive scaffold. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(1), 9–30. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9162-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312–320. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Duffy, M. C., & Azevedo, R. (2015). Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 338–348. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Durand, G. (2014). Challenges to research in MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., & Reinecke, K. (2014). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference, 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37–52. doi:10.1007/BF02504914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 38–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003, 31–43. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0717
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133–160. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40(1), 1–17. doi:10.1518/001872098779480587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kauffman, D. F., Ge, X., Xie, K., & Chen, C. H. (2008). Prompting in web-based environments: Supporting self-monitoring and problem solving skills in college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(2), 115–137. doi:10.2190/EC.38.2.a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kauffman, D. F., Zhao, R., & Yang, Y.-S. (2011). Effects of online note taking formats and self-monitoring prompts on learning from online text: Using technology to enhance self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 313–322. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, H. J., & Pedersen, S. (2011). Advancing young adolescents’ hypothesis-development performance in a computer-supported and problem-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1780–1789. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2016). Recommending self-regulated learning strategies does not improve performance in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, 101–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 19–38. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E‐learning environments?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kostons, D., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121–132. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. Y., & Ryu, H. (2013). Learner acceptance of a multimedia-based learning system. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(6), 419–437. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.715278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 629–648. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lehmann, T., Hähnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2–3), 141–155. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9012-y
   Google Scholar
• McInnerney, J. M, & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73-81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSporran, M., & Young, S. (2001). Does gender matter in online learning?. Research in Learning Technology, 9(2), 3–15. doi:10.3402/rlt.v9i2.12024
   Google Scholar
• *Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C. A., & Sleegers, P. J. (2011). Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement. Instructional Science, 39(6), 785–803. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9154-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Molenaar, I., Roda, C., van Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. (2012). Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 59(2), 515–523. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 36(3), 203–231. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9028-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz Cristóbal, J. A., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Gallego-Lema, V., Arribas-Cubero, H. F., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Martínez-Monés, A. (2017). Monitoring for awareness and reflection in ubiquitous learning environments. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1331536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G., Seaman, J., Shea, P., & Swan, K. (2012). Examining the extent and nature of online learning in American K-12 education: The research initiatives of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 127–135. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, The University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. doi:10.1080/00313830120074206
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. (2016). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2016. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2016/
   Google Scholar
• *Sitzmann, T., Bell, B. S., Kraiger, K., & Kanar, A. M. (2009). A multilevel analysis of the effect of prompting self-regulation in technology-delivered instruction. Personnel Psychology, 62(4), 697–734. doi:10.1111/peps.2009.62.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2009). Not everybody needs help to seek help: Surprising effects of metacognitive instructions to foster help-seeking in an online-learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1020–1028. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2010). Sometimes you need a reminder: The effects of prompting self-regulation on regulatory processes, learning, and attrition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 132–144. doi:10.1037/a0018080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suen, H. K. (2014). Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 312–327. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tangworakitthaworn, P., Gilbert, L., & Wills, G. B. (2015). A conceptualization of intended learning outcomes supporting self‐regulated learners in indicating learning paths. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(5), 393–404. doi:10.1111/jcal.2015.31.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., & Fan, Y. T. (2013). Research trends in self-regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 107–110. doi:10.1111/bjet.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, S., & Machado, P. (2002). E-learning, online learning, web-based learning, or distance learning: Unveiling the ambiguity in current terminology. Retrieved from http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=568597
   Google Scholar
• *Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 532–548. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 198–221. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu, K. P. L., Hanley, G. L., Strybel, T. Z., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Metacognitive processes in human-computer interaction: Self-assessments of knowledge as predictors of computer expertise. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12(1), 43–71. doi:10.1207/S15327590IJHC1201_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wang, T. H. (2011). Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school learners to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1801–1812. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wäschle, K., Lachner, A., Stucke, B., Rey, S., Frömmel, C., & Nückles, M. (2014). Effects of visual feedback on medical students’ procrastination within web-based planning and reflection protocols. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 120–136. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 429–444. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yeh, Y. F., Chen, M. C., Hung, P. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). Optimal self-explanation prompt design in dynamic multi-representational learning environments. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1089–1100. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E., & Top, E. (2013). Exploring the link among entry characteristics, participation behaviors and course outcomes of online learners: An examination of learner profile using cluster analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 716–728. doi:10.1111/bjet.2013.44.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhang, W. X., Hsu, Y. S., Wang, C. Y., & Ho, Y. T. (2015). Exploring the Impacts of Cognitive and Metacognitive Prompting on Students’ Scientific Inquiry Practices Within an E-Learning Environment. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 529–553. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.996796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187–202. doi:10.1007/s12564-016-9426-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 233–262). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar