Evaluating Initial Public Acceptance of Highly and Fully Autonomous Vehicles

References

• Abraham, H., Lee, C., Brady, S., Fitzgerald, C., Mehler, B., Reimer, B., & Coughlin, J. F. (2017). Autonomous vehicles and alternatives to driving: Trust, preferences, and effects of age. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting, January 8–12, 2017, Washington D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Adell, E., Várhelyi, A., & Nilsson, L. (2014). The definition of acceptance and acceptability. In M. A. Regan, T. Horberry, & A. Steven (Eds.), Driver acceptance of new technology: Theory, measurement, and optimization (pp. 23–34). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ajamieh, A., Benitez, J., Braojos, J., & Gelhard, C. (2016). IT infrastructure and competitive aggressiveness in explaining and predicting performance. Journal of Business Research, 69, 4667–4674. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, M., Seny Kan, K. A., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Direct and configurational paths of absorptive capacity and organizational innovation to successful organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 69, 5317–5323. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. M., Kalra, N., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., & Oluwatola, O. A. (2016). Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearth, A., & Siegrist, M. (2016). Are risk or benefit perceptions more important for public acceptance of innovative food technologies: A meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 49, 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2017). Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation, 44, 1293–1306. doi:10.1007/s11116-017-9808-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakwell, G. M. (2014). The psychology of risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfman, N. C., & Vázquez, E. L. (2011). A cross-cultural study of perceived benefit versus risk as mediators in the trust-acceptance relationship. Risk Analysis, 31, 1919–1934. doi:10.1111/risk.2011.31.issue-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda Carrión, G., Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Roldán, J. L. (2016). Prediction-oriented modeling in business research by means of PLS path modeling: Introduction to a JBR special section. Journal of Business Research, 69, 4545–4551. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998a). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22, 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998b). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Brlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31, 692–702. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B., Parkhurst, G., & Ricci, M. (2016). Understanding the socioeconomic adoption scenarios for autonomous vehicles: A literature review. Bristol, England: University of the West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Clothier, R. A., Greer, D. A., Greer, D. G., & Mehta, A. M. (2015). Risk perception and the public acceptance of drones. Risk Analysis, 35, 1167–1183. doi:10.1111/risa.12330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., Jones, P., & Cavoli, C. (2017). Social and behavioural questions associated with automated vehicles: Scoping study by UCL Transport Institute. London, UK: Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2010). Morality and nuclear energy: Perceptions of risks and benefits, personal norms, and willingness to take action related to nuclear energy. Risk Analysis, 30, 1363–1373. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01419.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, J. I. M., Steg, L., & Poortinga, W. (2013). Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis, 33, 307–317. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01845.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon, B. (2007). Human reliability and error in transportation systems. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Diels, C., & Bos, J. E. (2016). Self-driving carsickness. Applied Ergonomics, 53, 374–382. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser, J. R., Miles, S., & Frewer, L. J. (2002). Trust, perceived risk, and attitudes toward food technologies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2423–2433. doi:10.1111/jasp.2002.32.issue-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. (1982). Two structural equations models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440–452. doi:10.1177/002224378201900406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2016). Societal and individual acceptance of autonomous driving. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous driving: Technical, legal and social aspects (pp. 621–640). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1998). Understanding public attitudes to technology. Journal of Risk Research, 1, 221–235. doi:10.1080/136698798377141
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 51–90. doi:10.2307/30036519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J. D., & Boyle, L. N. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 39–49. doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, N., Fischer, A. R. H., & Frewer, L. J. (2012). Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 782–795. doi:10.1177/0963662510392485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haboucha, C. J., Ishaq, R., & Shiftan, Y. (2017). User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 78, 37–49. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014a). Multivariate data analysis. London, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014b). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM). London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hengstler, M., Enkel, E., & Duelli, S. (2016). Applied artificial intelligence and trust—The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 105–120. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenberger, C., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2016). How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 374–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenberger, C., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2017). Not fearless, but self-enhanced: The effects of anxiety on the willingness to use autonomous cars depend on individual levels of self-enhancement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 40–52. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Dai, D. (2014). Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 12–16, 2014, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 525–531. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulse, L. M., Xie, H., & Galea, E. R. (2018). Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science, 102, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutson, M. (2017). People don’t trust driverless cars. Researchers are trying to change that. Retrieved January 16, 2018, from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/12/people-don-t-trust-driverless-cars-researchers-are-trying-change doi:10.1126/science.aar7402
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1, 45–71. doi:10.1023/A:1019104520776
   Google Scholar
• König, M., & Neumayr, L. (2017). Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 44, 42–52. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körber, M., Baseler, E., & Bengler, K. (2018). Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 66, 18–31. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127–140. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Ward, C., Raue, M., D’Ambrosio, L., & Coughlin, J. F. (2017). Age differences in acceptance of self-driving cars: A survey of perceptions and attitudes. In J. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human aspects of IT for the aged population. Aging, design and user experience (pp. 3–13). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153–184. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50–80. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.3.385.50404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-G., Kim, K. J., Lee, S., & Shin, D.-H. (2015). Can autonomous vehicles be safe and trustworthy? Effects of appearance and autonomy of unmanned driving systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31, 682–691. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., & O’Connor, G. C. (2003). New product launch strategy for network effects products. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 241–255. doi:10.1177/0092070303031003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Yang, R., & Xu, Z. (in press). How safe is safe enough for self-driving vehicles? Risk Analysis. doi:10.1111/risa.13116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52, 1865–1883. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: A trust building model. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 297–323. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00020-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. M., & Ilgen, D. R. (2008). Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 50, 194–210. doi:10.1518/001872008X288574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouter, N., van Cranenburgh, S., & van Wee, B. (2017). Do individuals have different preferences as consumer and citizen? The trade-off between travel time and safety. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, 333–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. (2016). Federal automated vehicles policy: Accelerating the next revolution in roadway safety. Washington DC, USA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhoff, S., Arem, B. V., & Happee, R. (2016). Conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless vehicles. Transportation Research Record, 2602, 60–67. doi:10.3141/2602-08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noy, I. Y., Shinar, D., & Horrey, W. J. (2018). Automated driving: Safety blind spots. Safety Science, 102, 68–78. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230–253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 101–134. doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, J. E. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87–131. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27(Part B), 252–263. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pool, R. (1997). Beyond engineering: How society shapes technology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2005). Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? Risk Analysis, 25, 199–209. doi:10.1111/risk.2005.25.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, G. (2013). PLS path modeling with R. Berkeley, CA, USA: Trowchez Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014). Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. UMTRI-2014-30. Ann Arbor, MI: Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franěk, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 457–475. doi:10.1177/0022022105275962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2017). Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 694–696. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0202-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (1999). A causal model explaining the perception and acceptance of gene technology. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2093–2106. doi:10.1111/jasp.1999.29.issue-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20, 195–204. doi:10.1111/risk.2000.20.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 353–362. doi:10.1111/risk.2000.20.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. doi:10.2307/270723
   Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48, 159–205. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwel, B. W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., & Daamen, D. D. L. (2009). Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). Risk Analysis, 29, 1129–1140. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01226.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO (2015). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar