Abnormal Usage Sequence Detection for Identification of User Needs via Recurrent Neural Network Semantic Variational Autoencoder

References

• Abrahams, A. S., Jiao, J., Wang, G. A., & Fan, W. (2012). Vehicle defect discovery from social media. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 87–97. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algur, S. P., & Bhat, P. (2016). Abnormal web video detection using density based lof method. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 4, 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Amiriparian, S., Freitag, M., Cummins, N., & Schuller, B. (2017). Sequence to sequence autoencoders for unsupervised representation learning from audio. Proceedings of the dcase 2017 workshop, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Anzai, Y. (2012). Pattern recognition and machine learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Baeza-Yates, R., Jiang, D., Silvestri, F., & Harrison, B. (2015). Predicting the next app that you are going to use. In Proceedings of the eighth acm international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 285–294). Shanghai, China.
   Google Scholar
• Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000). Lof: Identifying density-based local outliers. ACM Sigmod Record, 29, 93–104. doi:10.1145/335191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S., Han, W., Tang, J., Qi, G.-J., Aggarwal, C. C., & Huang, T. S. (2015). Heterogeneous network embedding via deep architectures. In Proceedings of the 21th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 119–128). Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, R., & Trusov, M. (2010). Estimating aggregate consumer preferences from online product reviews. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(4), 293–307. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Chawla, N. V., & Swami, A. (2017). metapath2vec: Scalable representation learning for heterogeneous networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 135–144). New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Gerani, S., Carenini, G., & Ng, R. T. (2019). Modeling content and structure for abstractive review summarization. Computer Speech & Language, 53, 302–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, B.-R., Noh, Y., Lee, S.-J., & Park, S.-B. (2015). A combination of temporal and general preferences for app recommendation. In Big data and smart computing (bigcomp), 2015 international conference on (pp. 178–185). Jeju, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, M., Seo, S., & Kang, P. (2018). Recurrent neural network-based semantic variational autoencoder for sequence-to-sequence learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 1802, 03238.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, M., Seo, S., & Kang, P. (2019). Recurrent neural network-based semantic variational autoencoder for sequence-to-sequence learning. Information Sciences, 490, 59–73. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, J., Ji, P., & Gu, R. (2016). Identifying comparative customer requirements from product online reviews for competitor analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 49, 61–73. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2015.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, J., Ji, P., & Kwong, C. (2016). What makes consumers unsatisfied with your products: Review analysis at a fine-grained level. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 47, 38–48. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostakos, V., Ferreira, D., Goncalves, J., & Hosio, S. (2016). Modelling smartphone usage: A markov state transition model. In Proceedings of the 2016 acm international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing (pp. 486–497). Heidelberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, C. (2012). User experience innovation: User centered design that works. Berkeley, CA: Apress.
   Google Scholar
• Kujala, S., Kauppinen, M., & Rekola, S. (2001). Bridging the gap between user needs and user requirements. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, I, 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lappas, T., Crovella, M., & Terzi, E. (2012). Selecting a characteristic set of reviews. In Proceedings of the 18th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 832–840). doi:10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T., & Bradlow, E. T. (2007). Automatic construction of conjoint attributes and levels from online customer reviews. University Of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School Working Paper. doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Cho, S., & Choi, J. (2019). Determining user needs through abnormality detection and heterogeneous embedding of usage sequence. Electronic Commerce Research, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10660-019-09347-6
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Park, I., Cho, S., & Choi, J. (2018). Smartphone user segmentation based on app usage sequence with neural networks. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 329–339. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Sugiyama, K., Kan, M.-Y., & Chua, T.-S. (2014). New and improved: Modeling versions to improve app recommendation. In Proceedings of the 37th international acm sigir conference on research & development in information retrieval (pp. 647–656). Gold Coast, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Kong, D., Cen, L., Gong, N. Z., Jin, H., & Xiong, H. (2015). Personalized mobile app recommendation: Reconciling app functionality and user privacy preference. In Proceedings of the eighth acm international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 315–324). Shanghai, China.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Xiang, C., Li, S., Ren, J., Liu, R., Liang, L., … Chen, X. (2018). Hinextapp: A context-aware and adaptive framework for app prediction in mobile systems. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 22, 219–229.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015). What makes a useful online review? implication for travel product websites. Tourism Management, 47, 140–151. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly, D. K., Sugiyama, K., Lin, Z., & Kan, M.-Y. (2011). Product review summarization from a deeper perspective. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international acm/ieee joint conference on digital libraries (pp. 311–314). Ottawa, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., Sun, A., Yuan, Q., & Cong, G. (2012). Topic-driven reader comments summarization. In Proceedings of the 21st acm international conference on information and knowledge management (pp. 265–274). doi:10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, P., Ramakrishnan, A., Anand, G., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., & Shroff, G. (2016). Lstm-based encoder-decoder for multi-sensor anomaly detection. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 1607, 00148.
   Google Scholar
• Meire, M., Ballings, M., & Van Den Poel, D. (2016). The added value of auxiliary data in sentiment analysis of facebook posts. Decision Support Systems, 89, 98–112. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherji, A., Srinivasan, V., & Welbourne, E. (2014). Adding intelligence to your mobile device via on-device sequential pattern mining. In Proceedings of the 2014 acm international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing: Adjunct publication (pp. 1005–1014). Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, M. A., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L. (2014). A review of novelty detection. Signal Processing, 99, 215–249. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, J., Zhang, Z., Jeon, S., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Mining customer requirements from online reviews: A product improvement perspective. Information & Management, 53(8), 951–963. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehan, M., & Kim, D. J. (2016). Predicting the performance of online consumer reviews: A sentiment mining approach to big data analytics. Decision Support Systems, 81, 30–40. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumaker, R. P., Jarmoszko, A. T., & Labedz, C. S., Jr. (2016). Predicting wins and spread in the premier league using a sentiment analysis of twitter. Decision Support Systems, 88, 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, C., Hu, B., Zhao, W. X., & Philip, S. Y. (2019). Heterogeneous information network embedding for recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 31(2), 357–370. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2018.2833443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Wei, F., Yu, K., & Wu, X. (2018). App usage prediction based on an extended feature selection method rspec mic. In Big data analysis (icbda), 2018 ieee 3rd international conference on (pp. 324–328). Shanghai, China.
   Google Scholar
• Tsaparas, P., Ntoulas, A., & Terzi, E. (2011). Selecting a comprehensive set of reviews. In Proceedings of the 17th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 168–176). New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, P., Singh, P., & Yadava, R. (2017). Fuzzy c-means clustering based outlier detection for saw electronic nose. In 2017 2nd international conference for convergence in technology (i2ct) (pp. 513–519). Pune, India.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X., Lei, Y., & Zhou, X. (2018). A lof-based method for abnormal segment detection in machinery condition monitoring. In 2018 prognostics and system health management conference (phm-chongqing) (pp. 125–128). Chongqing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133–148. doi:10.1509/jm.74.2.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar