Grasping VR: Presence of Pseudo-Haptic Interface Based Portable Hand Grip System in Immersive Virtual Reality

References

• Achibet, M., Gouis, B. L., Marchal, M., Léziart, P., Argelaguret, F., Girard, A., … Kajimoto, H. (2017, March). Flexifingers: Multi-finger interaction in VR combining passive haptics and pseudo-haptics. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interface (3DUI). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Achibet, M., Marchal, M., Argelaguet, F., & Lécuyer, A. (2014, March). The virtual mitten: A novel interaction paradigm for visuo-haptic manipulation of objects using grip force. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interface (3DUI). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bharath, V. G., & Patil, R. (2018). Solid modelling interaction with sensors for virtual reality welding. In MATEC Web Conf. 144(01008) (pp. 1–6). Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, A., Deng, Y., Wampler, P., Rondot, D. H., McManus, M., & Badler, A. (2003). A taxonomy and comparison of haptic actions for disassembly tasks. In IEEE Virtual Reality 2003 (pp. 225–231). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Borst, C. W., & Indugula, A. P. (2005). Realistic virtual grasping. In IEEE Conference 2005 on Virtual Reality (pp. 91–98). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, G., Cant, J. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2009). Living in a material world: How visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 3111–3118. doi:10.1152/jn.00515.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, I., Hawkes, E. W., Christensen, D.L., Ploch, C.J., & Follmer, S. (2016). Wolverine: A wearable haptic interface for grasping in virtual reality. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and System (pp. 986–993). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, I., Ofek, E., Benko, H., Sinclair, M., & Holz, C. (2018). Claw: A multifunctional handheld haptic controller for grasping, touching, and triggering in virtual reality. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’ 18) Vol. 654 (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cybergrasp. (2017). CyberGlove Systems Inc. Retrieved from http://www.cyberglovesystems.com/cybergrasp
   Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, R., & Pearson, E. (1973). Tests for departure from normality. Empirical Results for the distributions of b2 and √ b1. Biometrika, 60(3), 613–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Tinguy, X., Pacchierotti, C., Marchal, M., & Lécuyer, A. (2018). Enhancing the stiffness perception of tangible objects in mixed reality using wearable haptics. In IEEE VR 2018-25th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (pp. 81–90). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Dominjon, L., Lecuyer, A., Burkhardt, J., Richard, P., & Richir, S. (2005). Influence of control/display ratio on the perception of mass of manipulated objects in virtual environments. In IEEE Proceedings VR 2005 (pp. 19–25). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Vargas, J., Tarvainen, T. V. J., Kita, K., & Yu, W. (2017). Effects of using virtual reality and virtual avatar on hand motion reconstruction accuracy and brain activity. IEEE Access, 5, 23736–23750. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2766174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. M., Forssberg, H., Johansson, R. S., & Westling, G. (1991). Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 477–482. doi:10.1007/BF00229824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S., & Kim, J. (2017). A study on immersion of hand interaction for mobile platform virtual reality contents. Symmetry, 9, 22. doi:10.3390/sym9020022
   Google Scholar
• Henrysson, A., Billinghurst, M., & Ollila, M. (2005). Virtual Object manipulation using a mobile phone. In International Conference on Augmented Tele-existence (ICAT’ 05) (pp. 164–171). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasiri, A., Ma, S., Qian, Y., Akahane, K., & Sato, M. (2015). Desktop versions of the string-based haptic interface – Spidar. In 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) (pp. 199–200). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, K., Kim, M., Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2018). Asymmetric interface: User interface of asymmetric virtual reality for new presence and experience. Behaviour & Information Technology (under review).
   Google Scholar
• Joo, H., Simon, T., & Shikh, Y. (2018). Total capture: A 3d deformation model for tracking faces, hands, and bodies. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 8320–8329). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Jeon, C., & Kim, J. (2017). A study on immersion and presence of a portable hand haptic system for immersive virtual reality. Sensors, 17, 1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Lee, J., Jeon, C., & Kim, J. (2017). A study on interaction of gaze pointer-based user interface in mobile virtual reality environment. Symmetry, 9, 189.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Lee, J., Kim, C., & Kim, J. (2018). TPVR: User interaction of third person virtual reality for new presence and experience. Symmetry, 10, 109.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. R., & Kim, G. J. (2017). Presence and immersion of “easy” mobile VR with open flip-on lenses. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST ‘17) (pp. 38: 1–38:7). New York, NY: ACM. Article 38.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura, T., & Nojima, T. (2012). Pseudo-haptic feedback on softness induced by grasping. In International Conference on Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication – Volume Part II (pp. 202–205). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Koyanagi, K., Fujii, Y., & Furusho, J. (2005). Development of VR-stef system with force display glove system. In 2005 International Conference on Augmented Tele-existence (ICAT’ 05) (pp. 91–97). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Jeong, K., & Kim, J. (2017). MAVE: Maze-based immersive virtual environment for new presence and experience. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 28, 3–4. doi:10.1002/cav.1756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2017). A study on immersion and VR sickness in walking interaction for immersive virtual reality applications. Symmetry, 9, 78.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann, P., & Rigoll, G. (2017). A diminished reality simulation for driver-car interaction with transparent cockpits. In IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) (pp. 305–306). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Marwecki, S., Brehm, M., Wagner, L., Cheng, L.-P., Mueller, F. F., & Baudisch, P. (2018). Virtualspace – Overloading physical space with multiple virtual reality users. In 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’ 18) (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Minamizawa, K., Fukamachi, S., Kajimoto, H., Kawakami, N., & Tachi, S. (2007). Gravity grabber: Wearable haptic display to present virtual mass sensation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Emerging Technologies (SIGGRAPH’ 07). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Minamizawa, K., Kajimoto, H., Kawakami, N., & Tachi, S. (2007). A wearable haptic display to present the gravity sensation – Preliminary observations and device design. In Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interface for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC’ 07) (pp. 133–138). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Myo Armband. (2016). Thalmic lab. Retrieved from https://developerblog.myo.com
   Google Scholar
• Otaduy, M. A., Okamura, A., & Subramanian, S. (2016). Haptic technologies for direct touch in virtual reality. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Courses (SIGGRAPH ‘16) (pp. 1–123). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Oyarzabal, M., Ferre, M., Cobos, S., Monroy, M., Barrio, J., & Ortego, J. (2007). Multi-finger haptic interface for collaborative tasks in virtual environments. In Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques (HCI 2007) (pp. 673–680). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Pacchierotti, C., Chinello, F., Malvezzi, M., Meli, L., & Prattichizzo, D. (2012, June 13–15). Two finger grasping simulation with cutaneous and kinesthetic force feedback. In P. Isokoski & J. Springare (Eds.). Haptics: Perception, devices, mobility, and communication (EuroHaptics 2012) (373–382). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, T. (2011, December). Understanding multimodal deixis with gaze and gesture in conversational interfaces (Thesis for: PhD). Shaker Verlag GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, T. (2012). Using virtual reality technology in linguistic research. In IEEE Virtual Reality Workshops (VRW) (pp. 83–84). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Pusch, A., & Lécuyer, A. (2011). Pseudo-haptics: From the theoretical foundations to practical system design guidelines. In 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI’ 11) (pp. 57–64). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pusch, A., Martin, O., & Coquillart, S. (2008). Hemp-hand-displacement based pseudo-haptics: A study of a force field application. In IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (pp. 59–66). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rinderknecht, M. D., Kim, Y., Santos-Carreras, L., Bleuler, H., & Gassert, R. (2013). Combined tendon vibration and virtual reality for post stroke hand rehabilitation. In World Haptics Conference (WHC) (pp 277–282). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Scheggi, S., Meli, L., Pacchierotti, C., & Prattichizzo, D. (2015). Touch the virtual reality: Using the leap motion controller for hand tracking and wearable tactile devices for immersive haptic rendering. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2015 Posters (SIGGRAPH ‘15). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M., & Sanshez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1993). Simulating peripheral vision in immersive virtual environments. Computers & Graphics, 17, 643–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1995). Taking steps: The influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2, 201–219.
   Google Scholar
• Tesic, R., & Banerjee, P. (1999). Exact collision detection using virtual objects in virtual reality modeling of a manufacturing process. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 18, 367–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, H. R., & Rekimoto, J. (2018). ElasticVR: Providing multi-level active and passive force feedback in virtual reality using elasticity. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘18) (pp. 1–4). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Vinayagamoorthy, V., Garau, M., Steed, A., & Slater, M. (2004). An eye gaze model for dyadic interaction in an immersive virtual environment: Practice and experience. Computer Graphics Forum, 23, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visell, Y., Fontana, F., Giordano, B., Nordahl, R., Serafin, S., & Bresin, R. (2009). Sound design and perception in walking interactions. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 67, 947–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visell, Y., Law, A., Ip, J., Smith, S., & Cooperstock, J. R. (2010). Interaction capture in immersive virtual environments via an intelligent floor surface. In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR) (pp. 313–314). Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Witmer, B. G., Jerome, C. J., & Singer, M. J. (2005). The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 14, 298–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., Chai, J., & Xu, Y.-Q. (2012). Combining marker-based mocap and rgb-d camera for acquiring high-fidelity hand motion data. In ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA’ 12) (pp. 33–42). Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland: Eurographics Association.
   Google Scholar