Persona Transparency: Analyzing the Impact of Explanations on Perceptions of Data-Driven Personas

References

• Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, J., Kwak, H., & Jansen, B. J. (2016). Towards automatic Persona generation using social media. Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS 2016), The 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud, IEEE, Vienna, Austria. 22–24 August.
   Google Scholar
• An, J., Kwak, H., & Jansen, B. J. (2017). Personas for content creators via decomposed aggregate audience statistics. Proceedings of advances in social network analysis and mining (ASONAM 2017). Presented at the Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2017), July 31, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• An, J., Kwak, H., Jung, S.-G., Salminen, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Customer segmentation using online platforms: Isolating behavioral and demographic segments for persona creation via aggregated user data. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 8, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, J., Kwak, H., Salminen, J., Jung, S.-G., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Imaginary people representing real numbers: Generating personas from online social media data. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 12, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blase, U., Leon, P. G., Cranor, L. F., Shay, R., & Wang, Y. (2012). Smart, useful, scary, creepy: Perceptions of online behavioral advertising. Proceedings of the eighth symposium on usable privacy and security (p. 4). ACM, Washington, DC. doi:https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist, A., & Arvola, M. (2002). Personas in action: Ethnography in an interaction design team. Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 197–200). ACM, Aarhus, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, S. W., Roberts, J. A., & Bradley, P. W. (2019). Experimental evidence of observed social media status cues on perceived likability. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(1), 41–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. N., Love, E., Milham, R. P., ElRif, P., & Alford, J. L. (2008). Quantitative evaluation of Personas as information. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52(16), 1107–1111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120805201602
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. N., & Milham, R. P. (2006). The Personas’ new clothes: Methodological and practical arguments against a popular method. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(5), 634–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000503
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Wang, D., Xie, I., & Quan, L. (2018). Image annotation tactics: Transitions, strategies and efficiency. Information Processing & Management, 54(6), 985–1001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. (1999). The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why high tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis, IN: Sams - Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dantin, U. (2005). Application of personas in user interface design for educational software. Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education-Volume 42 (pp. 239–247). Australian Computer Society, Inc., Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11171-005-0029-1
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2017). Algorithmic transparency in the news media. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 809–828. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1208053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K., & Walker, S. (2014). Big data, big questions| working within a black box: Transparency in the collection and production of big Twitter data. International Journal of Communication, 8, 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen A., Vuong A., George Karahalios K., ..., Sandvig C. (2015). “I always assumed that I wasn’T really that close to [Her]”: Reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 153–162). ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, M., Vaccaro, K., Karahalios, K., & Hamilton, K. (2017). “Be careful; Things can be worse than they appear”: Understanding biased algorithms and users’ behavior around them in rating platforms. Proceedings of the 11th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) (pp. 62–71). Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, M., Krishna Kumaran, S. R., Sandvig, C., & Karahalios, K. (2018). Communicating algorithmic process in online behavioral advertising. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, (pp.432), ACM, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, K. (2009). Designing for the digital age: How to create human-centered products and services. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2000). Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 241–250). ACM, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. G., Haag, M., Oleson, A., Mendez, C., Marsden, N., Sarma, A., & Burnett, M. (2017). Gender-Inclusiveness Personas vs. Stereotyping: Can we have it both ways? Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference (pp. 6658–6671). ACM Press, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Jahanbakhsh, F., Wai-Tat, F., Karahalios, K., Marinov, D., & Bailey, B. (2017). You want me to work with who?: Stakeholder perceptions of automated team formation in project-based courses. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3201–3212). ACM, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, A. (1994). Beyond segmentation. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 3(1), 60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Jerison, H. J. (1959). Effects of noise on human performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43(2), 96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, T., Guo, Q., Yaping, X., & Shiting, F. (2019). A diary study of information encountering triggered by visual stimuli on micro-blogging services. Information Processing & Management, 56(1), 29–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khashe, S., Lucas, G., Becerik-Gerber, B., & Gratch, J. (2019). Establishing social dialog between buildings and their users. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(17), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F. (2016). How much information?: Effects of transparency on trust in an algorithmic interface. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2390–2395). ACM, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., An, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2017). Automatic generation of Personas using Youtube social media data. Proceedins of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-50) (pp. 833–842), Waikoloa, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. D., & Sebastian Seung, H. (1999). Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401(6755), 788–791. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/44565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRouge, C., Jiao, M., Sneha, S., & Tolle, K. (2013). User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(11), e251–e268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Du, J., Cai, H., Farmer, R., Jiang, L., & Fenglin, B. (2016). Personas in O2O mobile healthcare: A method for identifying and creating user groups. e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on, IEEE (pp. 100–107), Macau, China.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmut, E. (2016). User experience design of a prototype Kiosk: A case for the Istanbul public transportation system. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(10), 802–813. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1199179
   Google Scholar
• Maroco, J. (2003). Análise estatística com utilização do SPSS. Lisboa, Portugal: Silabo.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, N., & Haag, M. (2016). Stereotypes and politics: Reflections on personas. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4017–4031). ACM, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, T., Judge, T., & Whittaker, S. (2012). How do designers and user experience professionals actually perceive and use personas? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1219–1228). ACM, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• McGinn, J. J., & Kotamraju, N. (2008). Data-driven persona development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1521–1524). ACM, Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. (2013). Personas - user focused design. London, UK: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. (2019). Personas - user focused design. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L., & Hansen, K. S. (2014). Personas is applicable: A study on the use of personas in Denmark. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.1665–1674). ACM, Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L., Hansen, K. S., Stage, J., & Billestrup, J. (2015). A template for design Personas: Analysis of 47 Persona descriptions from Danish industries and organizations. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 7(1), 45–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2004). Ad-Hoc Personas & empathetic focus [Personal website] Retrieved November 4, 2019, from Jnd.org website: http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/personas_empath.html.
   Google Scholar
• Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, J., & Adlin, T. (2006). The Persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout product design. Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003). Personas: Practice and theory. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences (pp. 1–15). ACM, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Rader, E. J. (2014). Awareness of behavioral tracking and information privacy concern in Facebook and Google. SOUPS. (pp.51–67).
   Google Scholar
• Rönkkö, K., Hellman, M., Kilander, B., & Dittrich, Y. (2004). Personas is not applicable: Local remedies interpreted in a wider context. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices - Volume 1 (pp. 112–120). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., Jansen, B. J., An, J., Kwak, H., Jung, S.-G. (2018). Are personas done? Evaluating their usefulness in the age of digital analytics. Persona Studies, 4(2), 47–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.21153/psj2018vol4no2art737
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Use cases and outlooks for automatic analytics. arXiv:1810.00358 [cs]. Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., Jung, S.-G., An, J., Kwak, H., Nielsen, L., & Jansen, B. J. (2019). Confusion and information triggered by photos in persona profiles. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 129, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., Kwak, H., Santos, J. M., Jung, S.-G., An, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Persona perception scale: Developing and validating an instrument for human-like representations of data. CHI’18 Extended Abstracts: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts Proceedings, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., Nielsen, L., Jung, S.-G., An, J., Kwak, H., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). “Is more better?”: Impact of multiple photos on perception of persona profiles. Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2018), Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., Şengün, S., Kwak, H., Jansen, B. J., An, J., Jung, S.-G., & Harrell, D. F. (2018). From 2,772 segments to five personas: Summarizing a diverse online audience by generating culturally adapted personas. First Monday, 23, 6. doi:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i6.8415
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., Jansen, B. J., An, J., Jung, S., Nielsen, L., & Kwak, H. (2018). Fixation and confusion – investigating eye-tracking participants’ Exposure to information in personas. Proceedings of The ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR 2018), 110–119.
   Google Scholar
• Seaver, N. (2013). Knowing algorithms. Media in Transition 8. Cambridge, MA: April.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, D. M. (2016). Data, trust, and transparency in personalized advertising (PhD Thesis). University of Michigan. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/133246?show=full
   Google Scholar
• Stoyanovich, J., Abiteboul, S., & Miklau, G. (2016). Data, responsibly: Fairness, neutrality and transparency in data analysis. International Conference on Extending Database Technology, Bordeaux, France.
   Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., & Stuart, E. (2019). She’s Reddit: A source of statistically significant gendered interest information? Information Processing & Management, 56(4), 1543–1558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.10.007
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y., Re, D. L., & Wang, Y. (2017). Folk Models of online behavioral advertising. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’17), 1957–1969. Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Brown, H.-F., & Shankar, A. (2016). Data-driven personas: Constructing archetypal users with Clickstreams and user telemetry. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5350–5359). ACM, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar