User Acceptance of Virtual Reality: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model

References

• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557–582. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoako-Gyampah, K. (2007). Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: An empirical study of ERP implementation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1232–1248. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreev, P., Heart, T., Maoz, H., & Pliskin, N. (2009). Validating formative partial least squares (PLS) models: Methodological review and empirical illustration. International conference on information systems, November 2015 (pp. 1–17), Phoenix, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, M., Guerchouche, R., Petit, P. D., Chapoulie, E., Manera, V., Chaurasia, G., … Robert, P. (2015). Is it possible to use highly realistic virtual reality in the elderly? A feasibility study with image-based rendering. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 11, 557–563. doi:10.2147/NDT.S73179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., & Bouchard, S. (2008). Applying the technology acceptance model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. Journal of Cyber Therapy and Rehabilitation, 1(2), 200–210.
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F. (1992). Will simulation sickness slow down the diffusion of virtual environment technology? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(3), 334–343. doi:10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.334
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, S., Robillard, G., & Renaud, P. (2007). Revising the factor structure of the simulator sickness questionnaire. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine, 5, 117–122.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283–295. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier, K., & Lourdeaux, D. (2013, February). Generation of learning situations according to the learner’s profile within a virtual environment. International conference on agents and artificial intelligence (pp. 245–260). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511–535. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T. M., & Chan, K. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use Second Life for enhancing healthcare education. Computers and Education, 59(4), 1136–1144. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, S. V. G., Nichols, S., Ramsey, A., & Wilson, J. R. (1999). Virtual Reality-Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE). Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(2), 169–186. doi:10.1162/105474699566152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyberpsychology Lab of UQO. (2013a). Questionnaire sur l’état de présence [Questionnaire]. Retrieved from http://w3.uqo.ca/cyberpsy/docs/qaires/pres/QEP_vf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cyberpsychology Lab of UQO. (2013b). Questionnaire sur les cybermalaises [Questionnaire]. Retrieved from http://w3.uqo.ca/cyberpsy/docs/qaires/ssq/SSQ_vf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1002. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, S., Kolb, N., & Hassenzahl, M. (2014, June). The ‘Hedonic’ in human-computer interaction – History, contributions, and future research directions. Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 305–314). doi:10.1145/2598510.2598549
   Google Scholar
• Diels, C., & Howarth, P. A. (2013). Frequency characteristics of visually induced motion sickness. Human Factors, 55(3), 595–604. doi:10.1177/0018720812469046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, P., & Amaro, S. (2018). Methods for modelling reflective-formative second order constructs in PLS. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, JHTT-09-2017-0092. doi: 10.1108/JHTT-09-2017-0092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, S. M., Smith, W. L., & Barney, C. E. (2012). Age as a moderator of attitude towards technology in the workplace: Work motivation and overall job satisfaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(5), 453–467. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2010.513419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M., Kilmon, C., & Pandey, V. (2012). Exploring the adoption of a virtual reality simulation. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(2), 117–127. doi:10.1108/10650741211212368
   Google Scholar
• Fetscherin, M., & Lattemann, C. (2008). User acceptance of virtual worlds. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9(3), 231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Février, F. (2011). Vers un modèle intégrateur “expérience-acceptation” : Rôle des affects et de caractéristiques personnelles et contextuelles dans la détermination d’usage d’un environnement numérique de travail (Doctoral thesis). Université de Rennes 2, Rennes, France. Retrieved from https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00608335/document
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornells-Ambrojo, M., Barker, C., Swapp, D., Slater, M., Antley, A., & Freeman, D. (2008). Virtual reality and persecutory delusions: Safety and feasibility. Schizophrenia Research, 104(1–3), 228–236. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2008.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, D., Bradley, J., Antley, A., Bourke, E., DeWeever, N., Evans, N., … Clark, D. M. (2016). Virtual reality in the treatment of persecutory delusions: Randomised controlled experimental study testing how to reduce delusional conviction. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 209(1), 62–67. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.115.176438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavish, N., Gutiérrez, T., Webel, S., Rodríguez, J., Peveri, M., Bockholt, U., & Tecchia, F. (2015). Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 778–798. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.815221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A beginner’s guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 283–297. doi:10.1207/s15328031us0304_4
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein fragebogen zur messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer qualität. In G. Szwillus & J. Ziegler (Eds.), Mensch & computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung (pp. 187–196). Berlin, Germany: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-322-80058-9_19
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In M. A. Blythe, K. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright(Eds., Funology: From usability to enjoyment (Vol. 3, pp. 31–42). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_4
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2008). User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine on - IHM ’08 (p. 11). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1512714.1512717
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., & Göritz, A. (2010). Needs, affect, and interactive products - Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 353–362. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(2009), 277–319. doi:10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
   Google Scholar
• Hornbæk, K., & Hertzum, M. (2017). Technology acceptance and user experience. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 24(5), 1–30. doi:10.1145/3127358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. H., & Yang, C. (2011). The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 31(2), 128–136. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S. Y., Fang, T. Y., Yeh, S. C., Su, M. C., Wang, P. C., & Wang, V. Y. (2017). Three-dimensional, virtual reality vestibular rehabilitation for chronic imbalance problem caused by Ménière’s disease: A pilot study*. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(16), 1601–1606. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1203027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-C., Backman, S. J., Backman, K. F., & Moore, D. (2013). Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing. Tourism Management, 36, 490–501. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2010). Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210:2010). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/52075.html
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Presence Research. (2000). The concept of presence: Explication statement. Retrieved from https://ispr.info
   Google Scholar
• Kauer, M., Theuerling, H., & Bruder, R. (2013). The importance of identification for the acceptance of consumer electronics on the example of the Wii. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32(4), 344–358. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2012.724085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R., & Lane, N. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203–220. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. K., Park, J., Choi, Y., & Choe, M. (2018). Virtual reality sickness questionnaire (VRSQ): Motion sickness measurement index in a virtual reality environment. Applied Ergonomics, 69(December 2017), 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2008). Adoption of virtual try-on technology for online apparel shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(2), 45–59. doi:10.1002/dir.20113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2010). Factors affecting adoption of product virtualization technology for online consumer electronics shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 38(3), 190–204. doi:10.1108/09590551011027122
   Google Scholar
• King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 43(6), 740–755. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kober, S. E., & Neuper, C. (2013). Personality and presence in virtual reality: Does their relationship depend on the used presence measure? International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 29(1), 13–25. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.668131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lallemand, C., Koenig, V., Gronier, G., & Martin, R. (2015). Création et validation d’une version française du questionnaire AttrakDiff pour l’évaluation de l’expérience utilisateur des systèmes interactifs. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 65(5), 239–252. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2015.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, R., Antonenko, P., Etopio, E., & Seccia, A. (2018). Comparison of virtual reality and hands on activities in science education via functional near infrared spectroscopy. Computers and Education, 124(May), 14–26. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.014
   Google Scholar
• LaViola, J. J. (2000). A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 32(1), 47–56. doi:10.1145/333329.333344
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. doi:10.1093/ct/14.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 752–780. Retrieved from http://infosys.coba.usf.edu/bs/Lee03-TAMcritique.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. J. W., & Parker, D. E. (2007). User experience modeling and enhancement for virtual environments that employ wide-field displays. In Digital human modeling (pp. 423–433). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73321-8_49
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., & Filieri, R. (2015). Airline passengers’ continuance intention towards online check-in services: The role of personal innovativeness and subjective knowledge. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 81, 158–168. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, 2. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
   Google Scholar
• Makransky, G., Lilleholt, L., & Aaby, A. (2017). Development and validation of the Multimodal Presence Scale for virtual reality environments: A confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 276–285. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manis, K. T., & Choi, D. (2019). The virtual reality hardware acceptance model (VR-HAM): Extending and individuating the technology acceptance model (TAM) for virtual reality hardware. Journal of Business Research, 100, 503–513. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour, K. B., & Bouslama, N. (2012). Analyse de l’intention d’usage de la banque par internet : Une extension du modèle d’acceptation de la technologie. In Congrès international de l’Association Française de Marketing. Brest, France. Retrieved from 20120603150143_S13_1_Ben_Mansour_et_Bouslama.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O., Cifuentes, L., & Davis, T. J. (2012). The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 551–568. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1980). Telepresence. Omni, 2, 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Muhanna, M. A. (2015). Virtual reality and the CAVE: Taxonomy, interaction challenges and research directions. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 27(3), 344–361. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2014.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mütterlein, J., & Hess, T. (2017, August). Immersion, presence, interactivity: Towards a joint understanding of factors influencing virtual reality acceptance and use. 23rd Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS)(pp. 1–10), Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Newbutt, N., Sung, C., Kuo, H.-J., Leahy, M. J., Lin, -C.-C., & Tong, B. (2016). Brief report: A Pilot study of the use of a virtual reality headset in autism populations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(9), 3166–3176. doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2830-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S., & Patel, H. (2002). Health and safety implications of virtual reality: A review of empirical evidence. Applied Ergonomics, 33(3), 251–271. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00020-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordaz, N., Romero, D., Gorecky, D., & Siller, H. R. (2015). Serious games and virtual simulator for automotive manufacturing education & training. Procedia Computer Science, 75(Vare), 267–274. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.247
   Google Scholar
• Rebenitsch, L., & Owen, C. (2016). Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Reality, 20(2), 101–125. doi:10.1007/s10055-016-0285-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, C. (1997). Some effects of using virtual reality technology: Data and suggestions. In R. J. Seidel & P. R. Chatelier (Eds.), Virtual reality, training’s future? (pp. 77–83). Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com/
   Google Scholar
• Serenko, A. (2008). A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification. Interacting with Computers, 20(4–5), 461–472. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 120–126. doi:10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.120
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D.-H., Biocca, F., & Choo, H. (2013). Exploring the user experience of three-dimensional virtual learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 203–214. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2011.606334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skopp, N. A., Smolenski, D. J., Metzger-Abamukong, M. J., Rizzo, A. A., & Reger, G. M. (2014). A pilot study of the virtusphere as a virtual reality enhancement. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 30(1), 24–31. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.796441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. (1999). Measuring presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(5), 560–565. doi:10.1162/105474699566477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1994). Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 3(2), 130–144. doi:10.1162/pres.1994.3.2.130
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603–616. doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9541-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, W. B. (2017). Psychometric evaluation of the simulator sickness questionnaire as a measure of cybersickness (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from Iowa State University Graduate Theses and Dissertations (No. 15429). Retrieved from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15429
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, G. H. (1994). A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decision Sciences, 25(5–6), 863–874. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01873.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H. M., & Cheng, W. L. (2009). The input-interface of Webcam applied in 3D virtual reality systems. Computers and Education, 53(4), 1231–1240. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S., Sonka, M., & Beichel, R. R. (2013). Lung segmentation refinement based on optimal surface finding utilizing a hybrid desktop/virtual reality user interface. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 37(1), 15–27. doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2013.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornson, C. A., Goldiez, B. F., & Le, H. (2009). Predicting presence: Constructing the tendency toward presence inventory. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67(1), 62–78. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokel, S. T., & İsler, V. (2013). Innovations in education and teaching international. Acceptance of Virtual Worlds as Learning Space, 3297(January 2014), 1–11. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.820139
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704. doi:10.2307/25148660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2011). An integrated model of interaction experience for information retrieval in a web-based encyclopaedia. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), 18–32. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115. doi:10.2307/3250981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. doi:10.2307/41410412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, & Speier. (1999). Computer technology training in the workplace: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1), 1–28. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2837
   Google Scholar
• Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y., & Groner, R. (2008). Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2274–2291. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 209–231). doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.05.023
   Google Scholar
• Witmer, B. G., Jerome, C. J., & Singer, M. J. (2005). The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators & virtual environments, 14(3), 298–312.
   Google Scholar
• Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225–240. doi:10.1162/105474698565686
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, S.-C., & Lin, P.-H. (2019). How motion-control influences a VR-supported technology for mental rotation learning: from the perspectives of playfulness, gender difference and technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–11. doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1571784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, M. Y., Fiedler, K. D., & Park, J. S. (2006). Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of it-based innovations: Comparative analyses of models and measures. Decision Sciences, 37(3), 393–426. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., Lee, S., & Park, T. (2018). JediFlight : Design and evaluation of wing-based flying experience in virtual reality. Proceedings of the 2018 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play companion extended abstracts - CHI PLAY ’18 extended abstracts (pp. 309–320). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/3270316.3273043
   Google Scholar
• Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: A meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 251–280. doi:10.1108/17465660710834453
   Google Scholar