A Systematic Review of Ten Years of Research on Human Interaction with Social Robots

References

• Abe, K., Hieida, C., Attamimi, M., Nagai, T., Shimotomai, T., Omori, T., & Oka, N. (2014). Toward playmate robots that can play with children considering personality. Proceedings of the acm international conference on human-agent interaction (pp. 165–168). Tsukuba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, M. I., Mubin, O., & Orlando, J. (2017). Adaptive social robot for sustaining social engagement during long-term children–robot interaction. International Journal of Human– Computer Interaction, 33(12), 943–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1300750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aly, A., & Tapus, A. (2013). A model for synthesizing a combined verbal and nonverbal behavior based on personality traits in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 325–332). Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Andrist, S., Mutlu, B., & Tapus, A. (2015). Look like me: Matching robot personality via gaze to increase motivation. Proceedings of the acm conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3603–3612). Seoul, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, C., Choi, J. J., & Kwak, S. S. (2014). Can you touch me? the impact of physical contact on emotional engagement with a robot. Proceedings of the international conference on human-agent interaction (pp. 149–152). Tsukuba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Croft, E., & Kulic, D. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechade, L., Dubuisson Duplessis, G., Sehili, M., & Devillers, L. (2015). Behavioral and emotional spoken cues related to mental states in human-robot social interaction. Proceedings of the acm international conference on multimodal interaction (pp. 347–350). Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethel, C. L., & Murphy, R. R. (2008). Survey of non-facial/non-verbal affective expressions for appearance-constrained robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 38(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharatharaj, J., Huang, L., & Al-Jumaily, A. (2015). Bio-inspired therapeutic pet robots: Review and future direction. In 2015 10th international conference on information, communications and signal processing (icics) (pp. 1–5). Singapore, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E., Mizrahi, M., Hoffman, G., Reis, H. T., Finkel, E. J., & Sass, O. (2016). Machines as a source of consolation: Robot responsiveness increases human approach behavior and desire for companionship. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human robot interaction (pp. 165–171). Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(4), 319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V. (1993). What the human face tells the human mind: Some challenges for the robot-human interface. Advanced Robotics, 8(4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855394X00149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, B., Lerasle, F., & Ferrané, I. (2009). Evaluations of embedded modules dedicated to multimodal human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the ieee international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (roman) (pp. 699–704). Toyama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, S., Gay, G., Pollack, J., Gonzales, A., Retelny, D., Lee, T., & Wansink, B. (2012). Caring for mobile phone-based virtual pets can influence youth eating behaviors. Journal of Children and Media, 6(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2011.633410
   Google Scholar
• Cabibihan, -J.-J., Javed, H., Ang, M., & Aljunied, S. (2013). Why robots? a survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(4), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0202-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpinella, C. M., Wyman, A. B., Perez, M. A., & Stroessner, S. J. (2017). The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS): development and validation. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 254–262). Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J., & Polo, F. (2013). Augmented reality gaming with sphero. Proceedings of acm siggraph mobile (p. 17). Anaheim, California.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, E., Dragan, A. D., & Srinivasa, S. S. (2013). Effects of robot capability on user acceptance. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 97–98). Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Charisi, V., Davison, D., Reidsma, D., & Evers, V. (2016). Evaluation methods for user- centered child-robot interaction. In 2016 25th ieee international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (roman) (pp. 545–550). New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, P., Tapus, A., Martin, J.-C., & Isableu, B. (2015). Social personalized human- machine interaction for people with autism: Defining user profiles and first contact with a robot. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction extended abstracts (pp. 101–102). Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. J., Kim, Y., & Kwak, S. S. (2014). Are you embarrassed?: The impact of robot types on emotional engagement with a robot. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 138–139). Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Clabaugh, C., Becerra, D., Deng, E., Ragusa, G., & Matarić, M. (2018). Month-long, in- home case study of a socially assistive robot for children with autism spectrum disorder. Proceedings of the companion of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 87–88). Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Crumpton, J., & Bethel, C. L. (2016). A survey of using vocal prosody to convey emotion in robot speech. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0329-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, T., & Boulos, M. (2014). Robots in health and social care: A complementary technology to home care and telehealthcare? Robotics, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics3010001
   Google Scholar
• Darrow, S., Kimbrell, A., Lokhande, N., Dinep-Schneider, N., Ciufo, T., Odom, B., … Bethel, C. L. (2018). Therabot™: A robotic support companion. Proceedings of the companion of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 37). Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, A., Billinghurst, M., Lindeman, R. W., & Swan, J. (2018). A systematic review of 10 years of augmented reality usability studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz, M., Saez-Pons, J., Heerink, M., & Angulo, C. (2013). Emotional factors in robot-based assistive services for elderly at home. 2013 ieee roman (pp. 711–716). Gyeongju, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Dragone, M., Holz, T., & O’Hare, G. M. (2006). Mixing robotic realities. Proceedings of the acm international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 261–263). Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dragone, M., Holz, T., & O’Hare, G. M. (2007). Using mixed reality agents as social interfaces for robots. Proceedings of the ieee international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (roman) (pp. 1161–1166). Jeju, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. A., & Murphy, R. R. (2012). A preliminary model for comfortable approach distance based on environmental conditions and personal factors. 2012 international conference on collaboration technologies and systems (cts) (pp. 622–627). Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. F., & Dias, J. (2014). Attentional mechanisms for socially interactive robots–a survey. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 6(2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2014.2303072
   Google Scholar
• Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, I. J., Koenig, N., Muja, M., Pantofaru, C., Sorokin, A., & Takayama, L. (2010). Help me help you: Interfaces for personal robots. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 187–188). Osaka, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., & Evers, V. (2009). Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users. Proceedings of the british hci group annual conference on people and computers: Celebrating people and technology (pp. 430–439). Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, L., Björsell, A., Laaksoharju, M., & Obaid, M. (2017). Investigating design implications towards a social robot as a memory trainer. Proceedings of the acm international conference on human agent interaction (pp. 5–10). Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, G. (2012). Dumb robots, smart phones: A case study of music listening companionship. Proceedings of the ieee international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (roman) (pp. 358–363). Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, G., Bauman, S., & Vanunu, K. (2016). Robotic experience companionship in music listening and video watching. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-015-0897-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, S. S., Oron-Gilad, T., Zaichyk, H., Sarne-Fleischmann, V., Olatunji, S., & Edan, Y. (2018). Toward socially aware person-following robots. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 10(4), 936–954. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2018.2825641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornfeck, K., Zhang, Y., & Lee, K. (2012). Philos: A sociable robot for human robot inter- actions and wireless health monitoring. Proceedings of the acm symposium on applied computing (pp. 293–294). Trento, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Hortensius, R., Hekele, F., & Cross, E. S. (2018). The perception of emotion in artificial agents. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 10(4), 852–864. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2018.2826921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imayoshi, A., Munekata, N., & Ono, T. (2013). Robots that can feel the mood: Context-aware behaviors in accordance with the activity of communications. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 143–144). Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, K., Ahn, S. J., Moore, J., Brown, S., Robertson, T. P., Marable, A., & Basu, A. (2014). Mixed reality virtual pets to reduce childhood obesity. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(4), 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S., Lim, H.-T., Kwak, S., & Biocca, F. (2012). Personality and facial expressions in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human- robot interaction (hri) (pp. 161–162). Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kachouie, R., Sedighadeli, S., Khosla, R., & Chu, M.-T. (2014). Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A mixed-method systematic literature review. International Journal of Human- Computer Interaction, 30(5), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.873278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H., Jr, Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Shen, S., Gary, H. E., & Ruckert, J. H. (2015). Will people keep the secret of a humanoid robot?: Psychological intimacy in hri. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 173–180). Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Katzakis, N., & Steinicke, F. (2018). Excuse me! perception of abrupt direction changes using body cues and paths on mixed reality avatars. Proceedings of the companion of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 147–148). Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Billinghurst, M., Bruder, G., Been-Lirn Duh, H., & Welch, G. F. (2018). Revisiting trends in augmented reality research: A review of the 2nd decade of ISMAR (2008–2017). IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG), 24(11), 2947–2962. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2868591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Maloney, D., Bruder, G., Bailenson, J., & Welch. G. (2017b). The effects of virtual human's spatial and behavioral coherence with physical objects on social presence in AR. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 28(3–4), e1771. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.1771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Nagendran, A., Bailenson, J. N., Raij, A., Bruder, G., Lee, M., Schubert, R., Yan, X., & Welch, G. F. (2017). A large-scale study of surrogate physicality and gesturing on human–surrogate interactions in a public space. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 4, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn, O., Bieber, G., & Fron, C. (2018). Perspectives on social robots: From the historic background to an experts’ view on future developments. Proceedings of the acm pervasive technologies related to assistive environments conference (pp. 186–193). Corfu, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, S. R. (2001). How the eyes affect the i: Gaze perception, cognition and the robot- human interface. Proceedings of the ieee international workshop on robot and human interactive communication. roman 2001 (cat. no. 01th8591) (pp. 359–365). Bordeaux, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., & Breazeal, C. (2010). Human social response toward humanoid robot’s head and facial features. Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the acm chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4237–4242). Atlanta, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Norouzi, N., Bruder, G., Wisniewski, P. J., & Welch, G. F. (2019). Mixed reality tabletop gameplay: Social interaction with a virtual human capable of physical influence. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2959575
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Rybski, P., Antanitis, J., & Savetsila, S. (2012). Personalization in HRI: A longitudinal field experiment. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 319–326). Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., Kim, S., Lee, G., & Lee, J. (2018). Robots in diverse contexts: Effects of robots tasks on expected personality. Proceedings of the companion of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 169–170). Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013). Social robots for long-term interaction: A survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., & Scassellati, B. (2014). Personalizing robot tutors to individuals’ learning differences. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 423–430). Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J. (2016). Social robots as interactive technology agents: Supporting design with exploratory assessment. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human robot interaction (pp. 629–630). Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Ju, W. (2016). Social robots for automated remote instruction. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human robot interaction (pp. 575). Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L.-Y., Chang, C.-W., & Chen, G.-D. (2009). Researches on using robots in education. International conference on technologies for e-learning and digital entertainment (pp. 479–482). Banff, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., … Moher, D. (2009). The prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta- analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), W–65. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003–4819-151-4-200908180-00136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, G. M., Gratch, J., King, A., & Morency, L.-P. (2014). It’s only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly, O., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2010). Acroban the humanoid: Playful and compliant physical child-robot interaction. Proceedings of acm siggraph emerging technologies 4). Los Angeles, California.
   Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F., Scheutz, M., Arnold, T., Voiklis, J., & Cusimano, C. (2015). Sacrifice one for the good of many?: People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 117–124). Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., Rogers, W., & Tiberio, L. (2013). Investigating healthcare providers’ acceptance of personal robots for assisting with daily caregiving tasks. Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the acm chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 499–504). Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mou, Y., Shi, C., Shen, T., & Xu, K. (2020). A systematic review of the personality of robot: Mapping its conceptualization, operationalization, contextualization and effects. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1663008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin-Frier, C., Fischer, T., Petit, M., Pointeau, G., Puigbo, J.-Y., & Pattacini, U. Dac-h3: A proactive robot cognitive architecture to acquire and express knowledge about the world and the self. (2018). IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 10(4), 1005–1022. others. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2017.2754143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, -J.-J. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, 1(209–0015), 13. https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
   Google Scholar
• Nalin, M., Baroni, I., Sanna, A., & Pozzi, C. (2012). Robotic companion for diabetic children: Emotional and educational support to diabetic children, through an interactive robot. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 260–263).Bremen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Norouzi, N., Bruder, G., Belna, B., Mutter, S., Turgut, D., & Welch, G. (2019). A systematic review of the convergence of augmented reality, intelligent virtual agents, and the internet of things. In Artificial intelligence in IoT (pp. pp. 1–37). Fadi Al-Turjman: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Norouzi, N., Kim, K., Hochreiter, J., Lee, M., Daher, S., Bruder, G., & Welch, G. (2018). A systematic survey of 15 years of user studies published in the intelligent virtual agents conference. Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent virtual agents (pp. 17–22). Sydney, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Norouzi, N., Kim, K., Lee, M., Schubert, R., Erickson, A., Bailenson, J., … Welch, G. (2019). Walking your virtual dog: Analysis of awareness and proxemics with simulated support animals in augmented reality. Proceedings of the ieee international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (pp. 253–264). Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Okamura, A. M., Mataric, M. J., & Christensen, H. I. (2010). Medical and health-care robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 17(3), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2010.937861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgoor, C., & Funk, M. (2018). Idlebot: Exploring non-engaging interaction design in personal spaces. Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the acm chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–5). Montreal, QC.
   Google Scholar
• Paepcke, S., & Takayama, L. (2010). Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 45–52). Osaka, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Paletta, L., Fellner, M., Schüssler, S., Zuschnegg, J., Steiner, J., Lerch, A., … Prodromou, D. (2018). Amigo: Towards social robot based motivation for playful multimodal intervention in dementia. Proceedings of the acm pervasive technologies related to assistive environments conference (pp. 421–427). Corfu, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Pecune, F., Chen, J., Matsuyama, Y., & Cassell, J. (2018). Field trial analysis of socially aware robot assistant. Proceedings of the international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1241–1249). Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, H., Zhou, C., Hu, H., Chao, F., & Li, J. (2015). Robotic dance in social robotics—a taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2015.2393558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennisi, P., Tonacci, A., Tartarisco, G., Billeci, L., Ruta, L., Gangemi, S., & Pioggia, G. (2016). Autism and social robotics: A systematic review. Autism Research, 9(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, M., Fischer, T., & Demiris, Y. (2016). Lifelong augmentation of multimodal streaming autobiographical memories. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 8(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2015.2507439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie, H., & Darzentas, J. (2017). Older people and robotic technologies in the home: Perspectives from recent research literature. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on pervasive technologies related to assistive environments (pp. 29–36). Island of Rhodes, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, M. D., Roster, C. A., & Chen, Y. (2016). Revealing sensitive information in personal interviews: Is self-disclosure easier with humans or avatars and under what conditions? Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, A., & Scassellati, B. (2015). Fostering learning gains through personalized robot-child tutoring interactions. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction extended abstracts (pp. 193–194). Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Ribes, A., Cerquides, J., Demiris, Y., & de Mantaras, R. L. (2015). Where is my keyboard? model-based active adaptation of action-space in a humanoid robot. Proceedings of the ieee international conference on humanoid robots (humanoids) (pp. 602–609). Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Ritschel, H. (2018). Socially-aware reinforcement learning for personalized human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1775–1777). Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ritschel, H., & André, E. (2017). Real-time robot personality adaptation based on reinforcement learning and social signals. Proceedings of the companion of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 265–266). Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., & Broadbent, E. (2014). The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: A review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(4), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, E., Whitney, D., Phillips, E., Chien, G., Tompkin, J., Konidaris, G., & Tellex, S. (2017). Communicating robot arm motion intent through mixed reality head-mounted displays. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.03655
   Google Scholar
• Rouanet, P., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Danieau, F., & Filliat, D. (2013). The impact of human-robot interfaces on the learning of visual objects. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 29(2), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2012.2228134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabelli, A. M., Kanda, T., & Hagita, N. (2011). A conversational robot in an elderly care center: An ethnographic study. Proceedings of acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (hri) (pp. 37–44). Lausanne, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Saga, T., Munekata, N., & Ono, T. (2014). Daily support robots that move on the body. Proceedings of the acm international conference on human-agent interaction (pp. 29–34). Tsukuba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Sardar, A., Joosse, M., Weiss, A., & Evers, V. (2012). Don’t stand so close to me: Users’ attitudinal and behavioral responses to personal space invasion by robots. In proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 229–230). Boston, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Satake, S., Kanda, T., Glas, D. F., Imai, M., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009). How to approach humans? strategies for social robots to initiate interaction. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 109–116). La Jolla, California.
   Google Scholar
• Saunderson, S., & Nejat, G. (2019). How robots influence humans: A survey of nonverbal communication in social human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(4), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00523-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, M., Stückler, J., & Behnke, S. (2014). Mobile teleoperation interfaces with adjustable autonomy for personal service robots. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 288–289). Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sibirtseva, E., Kontogiorgos, D., Nykvist, O., Karaoguz, H., Leite, I., Gustafson, J., & Kragic, C. (2018). A comparison of visualisation methods for disambiguating verbal requests in human-robot interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.08760
   Google Scholar
• Spaulding, S. (2018). Personalized robot tutors that learn from multimodal data. Proceedings of the international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1781–1783). Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Stiehl, W. D., Lee, J. K., Breazeal, C., Nalin, M., Morandi, A., & Sanna, A. (2009). The huggable: A platform for research in robotic companions for pediatric care. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 317–320). Como, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Syriopoulou-Delli, C. K., & Gkiolnta, E. (2020). Review of assistive technology in the training of children with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 66, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1706333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahir, Y., Rasheed, U., Dauwels, S., & Dauwels, J. (2014). Perception of humanoid social mediator in two-person dialogs. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 300–301).  Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, X. Z., Vázquez, M., Carter, E. J., Morales, C. G., & Steinfeld, A. (2018). Inducing bystander interventions during robot abuse with social mechanisms. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 169–177). Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, D., & Malle, B. F. (2018). What does it mean to trust a robot?: Steps toward a multidimensional measure of trust. Proceedings of the companion of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 263–264). Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Drift, E. J., Beun, R.-J., Looije, R., Blanson Henkemans, O. A., & Neerincx, M. A. (2014). A remote social robot to motivate and support diabetic children in keeping a diary. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 463–470).  Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Vandemeulebroucke, T., de Casterlé, B. D., & Gastmans, C. (2018). How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Aging & Mental Health, 22(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1286455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevelde, C., & Saldien, J. (2016). Demonstration of opsoro-an open platform for social robots. Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (hri) (pp. 555–556). Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Lu, C., Masuko, S., & Tanaka, J. (2018). Interactive online shopping with personalized robot agent. Proceedings of the acm international conference on intelligent user interfaces companion (p. 12). Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, G. F., Bruder, G., Squire, P., & Schubert, R. (2019). Anticipating widespread augmented reality: Insights from the 2018 AR visioning workshop (Tech. Rep. No. 786).
   Google Scholar
• Wistort, R., & Breazeal, C. (2009). Tofu: A socially expressive robot character for child interaction. Proceedings of the acm international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 292–293). Como, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmazyildiz, S., Read, R., Belpeame, T., & Verhelst, W. (2016). Review of semantic-free utterances in social human–robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1093856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zecca, M., Endo, N., Momoki, S., Itoh, K., & Takanishi, A. (2008). Design of the humanoid robot kobian-preliminary analysis of facial and whole body emotion expression capabilities. Proceedings of the ieee-ras international conference on humanoid robots (pp. 487–492). Daejeon, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Zecca, M., Mizoguchi, Y., Endo, K., Iida, F., Kawabata, Y., Endo, N., … Takanishi, A. (2009). Whole body emotion expressions for kobian humanoid robot—preliminary experiments with different emotional patterns. Proceedings of the ieee international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (roman) (pp. 381–386). Toyama, Japan.
   Google Scholar