References
- Acheampong, R. A., & Cugurullo, F. (2019). Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 349–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.009
- Ackermann, C., Beggiato, M., Schubert, S., & Krems, J. F. (2019). An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? Applied Ergonomics, 75, 272–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.002
- AlAdawy, D., Glazer, M., Terwilliger, J., Schmidt, H., Domeyery, J., Mehler, B., … Fridman, L. (2019). Eye contact between pedestrians and drivers. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (Driving Assessment ‘19) (pp. 301–307). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1710
- Beggiato, M., Witzlack, C., Springer, S., & Krems, J. (2017). The right moment for braking as informal communication signal between automated vehicles and pedestrians in crossing situations. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE ‘17) (pp. 1072–1081). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_101
- Bengler, K., Rettenmaier, M., Fritz, N., & Feierle, A. (2020). From HMI to HMIs: Towards an HMI framework for automated driving. Information, 11(61), 61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020061
- Biondi, F., Alvarez, I., & Jeong, K.-A. (2019). Human–vehicle cooperation in automated driving: A multidisciplinary review and appraisal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561792
- Böckle, M.-P., Brenden, A. P., Klingegård, M., Habibovic, A., & Bout, M. (2017). SAV2P: Exploring the impact of an interface for shared automated vehicles on pedestrians’ experience. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ‘17) (pp. 136–140). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131765
- Chang, C.-M., Toda, K., Sakamoto, D., & Igarashi, T. (2017). Eyes on a car: An interface design for communication between an autonomous car and a pedestrian. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
- Clamann, M., Aubert, M., & Cummings, M. L. (2017). Evaluation of vehicle-to-oedestrian communication displays for autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. Washingtion, DC: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
- Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
- Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., & Ahrenberg, L. (1993). Wizard of Oz studies: Why and how. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ‘93) (pp. 193–200). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/169891.169968
- De Clercq, K., Dietrich, A., Núñez Velasco, J. P., De Winter, J., & Happee, R. (2019). External human-machine interfaces on automated vehicles: Effects on pedestrian crossing decisions. Human Factors, 61(8), 1353–1370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819836343
- Dey, D., Habibovic, A., Pfleging, B., Martens, M., & Terken, J. (2020). Color and animation preferences for a light band eHMI in interactions between automated vehicles and pedestrians. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘20) (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376325
- Dey, D., & Terken, J. (2017). Pedestrian interaction with vehicles: Roles of explicit and implicit communication. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ‘17) (pp. 109–113). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3123009
- Dey, D., Walker, F., Martens, M., & Terken, J. (2019). Gaze patterns in pedestrian interaction with vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ’19) (pp. 369–378). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344523
- Dietrich, A., Willrodt, J.-H., Wagner, K., & Bengler, K. (2018). Projection-based external human machine interfaces: Enabling interaction between automated vehicles and pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 17th European VR, Driving Simulation & Virtual Reality Conference & Exhibition (DSC ‘18) (pp. 43–50).
- European Commission. (2018). Speed and speed management 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/ersosynthesis2018-speedspeedmanagement.pdf
- Faas, S. M., & Baumann, M. (2019). Light-based external human machine interface: Color evaluation for self-driving vehicle and pedestrian interaction. In Proceedings of the 63rd Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (HFES ‘19) (pp. 1232–1236). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631049
- Faas, S. M., Kao, A. C., & Baumann, M. (2020). A longitudinal video study on communicating status and intent for self-driving vehicle – Pedestrian interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘20) (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376484
- Faas, S. M., Mathis, L.-A., & Baumann, M. (2020). External HMI for self-driving vehicles: Which information shall be displayed? Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 68, 171–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.009
- Färber, B. (2016). Communication and communication problems between autonomous vehicles and human drivers. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous driving (1st ed., (pp. 125–144). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_7
- Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure. (2020). German road traffic regulations. https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/EN/Documents/160108_stvo_eng.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
- Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Garrett, J. C. (2017). Opinion: How your car’s tinted windows pose a hazard to cyclists, pedestrians and police. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/readersreact/la-ol-le-tinted-windows-pedestrians-cyclists-20170919-story.html
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 Update (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
- Guéguen, N., Meineri, S., & Eyssartier, C. (2015). A pedestrian’s stare and drivers’ stopping behavior: A field experiment at the pedestrian crossing. Safety Science, 75, 87–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.018
- Habibovic, A., Andersson, J., Malmsten Lundgren, V., Klingegård, M., Englund, C., & Larsson, S. (2019). External vehicle interfaces for communication with other road users? In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road Vehicle Automation 5 (pp. 91–102). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94896-6_9
- Habibovic, A., Andersson, J., Nilsson, M., Lundgren, V. M., & Nilsson, J. (2016). Evaluating interactions with non-existing automated vehicles: Three Wizard of Oz approaches. In 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 32–37). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2016.7535360
- Habibovic, A., Lundgren, V. M., Andersson, J., Klingegård, M., Lagström, T., Sirkka, A., Fagerlönn, J., Edgren, C., Fredriksson, R., Krupenia, S., Saluäär, D., & Larsson, P. (2018). Communicating intent of automated vehicles to pedestrians. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01336
- Havard, C., & Willis, A. (2012). Effects of installing a marked crosswalk on road crossing behaviour and perceptions of the environment. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.12.007
- Hawkins, A. J. (2018). Self-driving pods are slow, boring, and weird-looking - and that’s a good thing. https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/17/17859112/self-driving-cars-shuttle-pods-delivery-services
- Hensch, A.-C., Neumann, I., Beggiato, M., Halama, J., & Krems, J. F. (2019). How should automated vehicles communicate? Effects of a light-based communication approach in a Wizard-of-Oz study. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE ‘19) (pp. 79–91). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_8
- Himanen, V., & Kulmala, R. (1998). An application of logit models in analyzing the behavior of pedestrians and car drivers on pedestrian crossings. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 20(3), 187–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(88)90003-6
- Hudson, C. R., Deb, S., Carruth, D. W., McGinley, J., & Frey, D. (2019). Pedestrian perception of autonomous vehicles with external interacting features. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE ‘18) (pp. 33–39). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94334-3_5
- International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Road vehicles: Ergonomic aspects of external visual communication from automated vehicles to other road users (ISO/TR 23049:2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/74397.html
- Joisten, P., Alexandi, E., Drews, R., Klassen, L., Petersohn, P., Pick, A., Schwindt, S., & Abendroth, B. (2019). Displaying vehicle driving mode: Effects on pedestrian behavior and perceived safety. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design: Future Trends and Applications (IHSED ‘19) (pp. 250–256). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_38
- Kim, S., Chang, J. J. E., Park, H. H., song, S. U., Cha, C. B., Kim, J. W., & Kang, N. (2020). Autonomous taxi service design and user experience. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 36(5), 429–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1653556
- Kitazaki, S., & Myhre, N. J. (2015). Effects of non-verbal communication cues on decisions and confidence of drivers at an uncontrolled intersection. In Proceedings of the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 113–119).
- Lagström, T., & Lundgren, V. M. (2015). Automated vehicle’s interaction with pedestrians. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/238401/238401.pdf
- Lee, J. (2017). Reader responses: How do you feel about over-tinted car windows? https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/reader-responses-how-do-you-feel-about-over-tinted-car-windows/
- Liu, Y., Lyu, Y., Böttcher, K., & Rötting, M. (2020). External interface-based autonomous vehicle-to-pedestrian communication in urban traffic: Communication needs and design considerations. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 2(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1736891
- Liu, Y.-C., & Tung, Y.-C. (2014). Risk analysis of pedestrians’ road-crossing decisions: Effects of age, time gap, time of day, and vehicle speed. Safety Science, 63(63), 77–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.002
- Lundgren, V. M., Habibovic, A., Andersson, J., Lagström, T., Nilsson, M., Sirkka, A., … Saluäär, D. (2017). Will there be new communication needs when introducing automated vehicles to the urban context? In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE ‘16) (pp. 485–497). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_41
- Madigan, R., Nordhoff, S., Fox, C., Ezzati Amini, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A., & Merat, N. (2019). Understanding interactions between automated road transport systems and other road users: A video analysis. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66, 196–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.006
- Mahadevan, K., Somanath, S., & Sharlin, E. (2018). Communicating awareness and intent in autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘18) (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174003
- National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2019). Pedestrians: 2017 data. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 681). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
- Navarro, J., Osiurak, F., Ovigue, M., Charrier, L., & Reynaud, E. (2019). Highly automated driving impact on drivers’ gaze behaviors during a car-following task. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 35(11), 1008–1017. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561788
- Osswald, S., Wurhofer, D., Trösterer, S., Beck, E., & Tscheligi, M. (2012). Predicting information technology usage in the car: Towards a car technology acceptance model. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 51–58). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2390256.2390264
- Palmeiro, A. R., van der Kint, S., Vissers, L., Farah, H., de Winter, J. C. F., & Hagenzieker, M. (2018). Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 1005–1020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.020
- Rasouli, A., Kotseruba, I., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2017). Agreeing to cross: How drivers and pedestrians communicate. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium IV (pp. 264–269). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
- Rasouli, A., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2018). Autonomous vehicles that interact with pedestrians: A survey of theory and practice. ArXiv:1805.11773v1.
- Ren, Z., Jiang, X., & Wang, W. (2016). Analysis of the influence of pedestrians’ eye contact on drivers’ comfort boundary during the crossing conflict. Procedia Engineering, 137(137), 399–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.274
- Rodríguez, P. (2017). Safety of pedestrians and cyclists when interacting with automated vehicles: A case study of the WEpods. https://www.raddelft.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Paola-Rodriguez-Safety-of-Pedestrians-and-Cyclists-when-Interacting-with…pdf
- SAE International. (2018). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (J3016). https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806/
- SAE International. (2019). Autonomous vehicle lighting (J3134). https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3134/
- Schieben, A., Wilbrink, M., Kettwich, C., Madigan, R., Louw, T., & Merat, N. (2019). Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: Design considerations based on human needs and expectations. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2019(21), 69–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0521-z
- Schmidt, S., & Färber, B. (2009). Pedestrians at the kerb: Recognising the action intentions of humans. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(12), 300–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2009.02.003
- Schöttle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia (Report No. UMTRI-2014-21). https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/108384/103024.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Singh, S. (2018). Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. (Traffic Safety Facts Crash•Stats. Report No. DOT HS 812 506). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
- Sivak, M., & Schöttle, B. (2015). Road safety with self-driving vehicles: General limitations and road sharing with conventional vehicles (Report No. UMTRI-2015-2). https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/111735/103187.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Song, Y. E., Lehsing, C., Fuest, T., & Bengler, K. (2018). External HMIs and their effect on the interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI ‘18) (pp. 13–18). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73888-8
- Stadler, S., Cornet, H., Novaes Theoto, T., & Frenkler, F. (2019). A tool, not a toy: Using virtual reality to evaluate the communication between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians. In M. C. Tom Dieck & T. Jung (Eds.), Augmented reality and virtual reality (pp. 203–216). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06246-0_15
- Šucha, M., Dostal, D., & Risser, R. (2017). Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 102(102), 41–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.018
- Texas A&M Transportation Institute. (2018). Variable speed limits. https://mobility.tamu.edu/mip/strategies-pdfs/active-traffic/technical-summary/Variable-Speed-Limit-4-Pg.pdf
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Taskforce on Autonomous Vehicle Signalling Requirements. (2019). Draft report: 4rd meeting (Report AVSR-04-05). https://wiki.unece.org/download/attachments/78742442/AVSR-04-05e.docx?api=v2
- Varhelyi, A. (1998). Drivers’ speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: A case study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30(30), 731–743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00026-8
- Vitale, J., Jr., & Giffi, C. A. (2017). What’s ahead for fully autonomous driving: Consumer opinions on advanced vehicle technology. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/de/Documents/manufacturing/us-manufacturing-consumer-opinions-on-advanced-vehicle-technology
- Walker, F., Dey, D., Martens, M., Pfleging, B., Eggen, B., & Terken, J. (2019). Feeling-of-safety slider: Measuring pedestrian willingness to cross roads in field interactions with vehicles. In Extended abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312880
- Werner, A. (2018). New colors for autonomous driving: An evaluation of chromaticities for the external lighting equipment of autonomous vehicles. Colour Turn, 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25538/tct.v0i1.692
- Whiting, D. (2019). Darkly tinted car windows may look cool, but they pose a danger — In traffic and in your wallet. https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/23/darkly-tinted-car-windows-may-look-cool-but-they-pose-a-danger-in-traffic-and-in-your-wallet/